Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detecting Occult Malignancy in Prophylactic Mastectomy: Preoperative MRI Versus Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

High-risk patients undergoing prophylactic mastectomy (PM) may have unsuspected cancers identified on pathology. The optimum way to identify and manage them is controversial. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may identify occult cancer preoperatively. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows intraoperative staging and axillary dissection during the same operation. We determined the efficacy and cost of MRI and/or SLNB in managing high-risk PM patients.

Methods

We reviewed 192 PMs in 173 patients from 1999 to 2005. Costs were estimated for MRI and SLNB during PM by the 2005 Medicare Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. We also estimated costs and procedures for the four strategies in a larger hypothetical cohort.

Results

A total of 19 (10%) of 192 PMs contained occult cancers, 14 ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) and 5 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In 59 patients, MRI detected an IDC but missed two DCIS and an IDC. Positive MRIs generated an additional average cost of $1207 per patient. In 56 PMs with SLNB, 6 occult cancers were found, 5 DCIS and 1 IDC, all with negative SLNBs. Adding a SLNB costs an additional average of $644. A theoretical analysis demonstrated that PM alone costs $808 per patient, PM with SLNB costs $1420, PM with MRI and selective SLNB costs $1774, and PM with routine MRI and SLNB costs $2379.

Conclusions

MRI adds great cost and misses most occult cancers in PMs. SLNB allows the rare patient with occult IDC to avoid axillary dissection but adds cost. Given the low rate of unsuspected invasive cancers and the costs of MRI and SLNB, neither is recommended as standard practice for PM patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:77–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rebbeck T, Friebel T, Lynch H, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1055–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rebbeck T, Lynch H, Neuhausen S, et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1616–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lostumbo L, Carbine N, Wallace J, Ezzo J. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;18:CD002748

    Google Scholar 

  5. McDonnell S, Schaid D, Myers J, et al. Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3938–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. King T, Ganaraj A, Fey J, et al. Cytokeratin-positive cells in sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer are not random events: experience in patients undergoing prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer 2004;10:926–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldflam K, Hunt K, Gershenwald J, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Predictors of significant histologic findings. Cancer 2004;101:1977–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoogerbrugge N, Bult P, de Widt-Levert LM, et al. High prevalence of premalignant lesions in prophylactically removed breasts from women at hereditary risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:41–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kroll SS, Miller MJ, Schusterman MA, et al. Rationale for elective contralateral mastectomy with immediate bilateral reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1:457–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boughey J, Khakpour N, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Selective use of sentinel lymph node surgery during prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer 2006;107:1440–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kriege M, Brekelmans C, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004;351:427–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoutjesdijk M, Boetes C, Jager G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1095–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liberman L, Morris E, Kim C, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:333–41

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee S, Orel S, Woo I, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 2003;226:773–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bedrosian I, Schlencker J, Spitz F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:457–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim T, Giuliano A, Lyman G. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis. Cancer 2006;106:4–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilke L, McCall L, Posther K, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:491–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Temple L, Baron R, Cody H, et al. Sensory morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: a prospective study of 233 women. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:654–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. American Medical Association. Current procedural terminology code: relative value search. 2005. Available at: http://www.catalog.ama-assn.org/Catalog/cpt/cpt_search.jsp. Accessed March 20, 2006

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Specht MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Black, D., Specht, M., Lee, J.M. et al. Detecting Occult Malignancy in Prophylactic Mastectomy: Preoperative MRI Versus Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 2477–2484 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9356-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9356-1

Keywords

Navigation