Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues: A Core Curriculum for Surgical Residents

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Most surgical training programs have no curriculum to teach palliative care. Programs designed for nonsurgical specialties often do not meet the unique needs of surgeons. With 80-hour workweek limitations on in-hospital teaching, new methods are needed to efficiently teach surgical residents about these problems.

Methods

A pilot curriculum in palliative surgical care designed for residents was presented in three 1-hour sessions. Sessions included group discussion, role-playing exercises, and instruction in advanced clinical decision making. Residents completed pretest, posttest, and 3-month follow-up surveys designed to measure the program’s success.

Results

Forty-seven general surgery residents from Brown University participated. Most residents (94%) had “discussed palliative care with a patient or patient’s family” in the past. Initially, 57% of residents felt “comfortable speaking to patients and patients’ families about end-of-life issues,” whereas at posttest and at 3-month intervals, 80% and 84%, respectively, felt comfortable (P < .01). Few residents at pretest (9%) thought that they had “received adequate training in palliation during residency,” but at posttest and at 3-month follow-up, 86% and 84% of residents agreed with this statement (P < .01). All residents believed that “managing end-of-life issues is a valuable skill for surgeons.” Ninety-two percent of residents at 3-month follow-up “had been able to use the information learned in clinical practice.”

Conclusions

With a reasonable time commitment, surgical residents are capable of learning about palliative and end-of-life care. Surgical residents think that understanding palliative care is a useful part of their training, a sentiment that is still evident 3 months later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Miner TJ, Jacques DP, Tavaf-Motamen H, Shriver CD. Decision making in surgical palliation based on patient outcome data. Am J Surg 1999; 177:150–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Easson AM, Crosby JA, Librach SL. Discussion of death and dying in surgical textbooks. Am J Surg 2001; 182:34–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Miner TJ, Jaques DP, Shriver CD. A prospective evaluation of patients undergoing surgery for the palliation of an advanced malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:696–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American College of Surgeons. The surgeon and palliative care. Principles guiding care at the end of life. Available at: http://www.facs.org/palliativecare/statement.html. Accessed March 1, 2006

  5. McCahill LE, Dunn GP, Mosenthal AC, Milch RA, Krouse RS. Palliation as a core surgical principle: part 2. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199:321–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Board of Surgery. Specialty of surgery (general surgery) defined. Available at: http://www.home.absurgery.org/default.jsp?aboutsurgerydefined. Accessed March 1, 2006

  7. Association for Surgical Education. Available at: http://www.surgicaleducation.com/mc/page.do. Accessed January 28, 2007

  8. Mccahill LE, Krouse RS, Chu DZ, et al. Indications and use of palliative surgery—results of Society of Surgical Oncology Survey. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:104–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miner TJ, Jaques DP, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF. Defining palliative surgery in patients receiving noncurative resections for gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 198:1013–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McCahill LE, Krouse RS, Chu DZ, et al. Decision making in palliative surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195:411–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krouse RS, Easson AM, Angelos P. Ethical considerations and barriers to research in surgical palliative care. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196:469–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995; 274:1591–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miner TJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. A prospective, symptom related, outcomes analysis of 1,022 palliative procedures for advanced cancer. Ann Surg 2004; 240:719–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buckman R. Communication skills in palliative care: a practical guide. Neurol Clin 2001; 19:989–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Larson JL, Williams RG, Ketchum J, Boehler ML, Dunnington GL. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents. Surgery 2005; 138:640–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aucar JA, Groch NR, Troxel SA, Eubanks SW. A review of surgical simulation with attention to validation methodology. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005; 15:82–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cassell J, Buchman TG, Streat S, Stewart RM. Surgeons, intensivists, and the covenant of care: administrative models and values affecting care at the end of life. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1263–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Galante JM, Bowles TL, Khatri VP, Schneider PD, Goodnight JE Jr, Bold RJ. Experience and attitudes of surgeons toward palliation in cancer. Arch Surg 2005; 140:873–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Miner MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klaristenfeld, D.D., Harrington, D.T. & Miner, T.J. Teaching Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues: A Core Curriculum for Surgical Residents. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 1801–1806 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9324-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9324-1

Keywords

Navigation