Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carcinoid of the Rectum Risk Stratification (CaRRs): A Strategy for Preoperative Outcome Assessment

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Predicting rectal carcinoid behavior based exclusively on tumor size is imprecise. We sought to identify factors associated with outcome and incorporate them into a pre-operative risk stratification scheme.

Methods

Seventy rectal carcinoid patients evaluated at our institution were identified. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic data were collected and correlated with recurrence and survival.

Results

The mean age of our cohort was 53.6 years. Fifty-seven percent of patients were female. The mean tumor size was 1.3 cm (range: 0.1–5 cm). Twenty-five percent of patients had deeply invasive tumors (into the muscularis propria or deeper); an equal percentage had tumors with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or an elevated mitotic rate (≥2/50 HPF). Eleven patients (17%) had distant metastases at presentation. Sixty-one patients were followed for a median of 22 months (2–308 months), during which seven patients developed recurrence and seven died of disease (2/7 who developed recurrence). Poor outcome was associated with large tumor size, deep invasion, presence of LVI, and elevated mitotic rate. These factors were incorporated into a carcinoid of the rectum risk stratification (CaRRS) score. CaRRS predicted recurrence-free and disease-specific survival better than any single factor alone.

Conclusions

Poor prognostic features of rectal carcinoids include: large size, deep invasion, LVI, and elevated mitotic rate. The CaRRS score incorporates these features and accurately predicts outcome. Because the CaRRS score is based upon values available on pre-operative biopsy, it can identify patients with very favorable prognosis as well as those with poor prognosis that may benefit from additional staging or surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rorstad O. Prognostic indicators for carcinoid neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. J Surg Oncol 2005; 89(3):151–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Soga J. Carcinoids of the rectum: an evaluation of 1271 reported cases. Surg Today 1997; 27(2):112–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mani S, et al. Carcinoids of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179(2):231–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schindl M, et al. Stage-dependent therapy of rectal carcinoid tumors. World J Surg 1998; 22(6):628–33; discussion 634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jetmore AB, et al. Rectal carcinoids: the most frequent carcinoid tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35(8):717–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Naunheim KS, et al. Rectal carcinoid tumors–treatment and prognosis. Surgery 1983; 94(4):670–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Federspiel BH, et al. Rectal and colonic carcinoids. A clinicopathologic study of 84 cases. Cancer 1990; 65(1):135–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koura AN, et al. Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: effect of size, histopathology, and surgical treatment on metastasis free survival. Cancer 1997; 79(7):1294–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soga J. Early-stage carcinoids of the gastrointestinal tract: an analysis of 1914 reported cases. Cancer 2005; 103(8):1587–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shirouzu K, et al. Treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. Am J Surg 1990; 160(3):262–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hochwald SN, et al. Prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: an analysis of 136 cases with a proposal for low-grade and intermediate-grade groups. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(11):2633–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Travis WD, et al. Survival analysis of 200 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors with clarification of criteria for atypical carcinoid and its separation from typical carcinoid. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22(8):934–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heah SM, et al. Tumor size is irrelevant in predicting malignant potential of carcinoid tumors of the rectum. Tech Coloproctol 2001; 5(2):73–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikou GC, et al. Current diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal carcinoids in a series of 101 patients: the significance of serum chromogranin-A, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin analogues. Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52(63):731–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin R. Weiser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fahy, B.N., Tang, L.H., Klimstra, D. et al. Carcinoid of the Rectum Risk Stratification (CaRRs): A Strategy for Preoperative Outcome Assessment. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 1735–1743 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9311-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9311-6

Keywords

Navigation