Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characteristics and Treatment of Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Analysis of 892 Cases from the National Cancer Data Base

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is characterized by various combinations of adenocarcinoma, mesenchymal, and other epithelial components. It was officially recognized as a distinct pathologic diagnosis in 2000. With few published reports, we hypothesized that MBC may have markedly different characteristics at presentation than typical infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and may be managed differently.

Methods

Data from patients with MBC and IDC reported to the National Cancer Database from January 2001 through December 2003 were reviewed for year of diagnosis, patient age, race/ethnicity, tumor size, nodal status, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, tumor grade, hormone receptor status, and initial treatment, and were analyzed statistically by the Pearson χ2 test.

Results

A total of 892 patients with MBC and 255,164 patients with IDC were identified. The group with MBC was older (mean age, 61.1 vs. 59.7 years; P = .001), had a significantly increased proportion of African American (14.1%, 126 of 892, vs. 10.2%, 25,900 of 255,164; odds ratio [OR], 1.455, P = .001) and Hispanic patients (5.5%, 49 of 892 vs. 3.9%, 9,947 of 255,164; OR, 1.817, P = .001), had fewer T1 tumors (29.5% vs. 65.2%), more N0 tumors (78.1% vs. 65.7%, OR, .5, P = .001), more poorly or undifferentiated tumors (67.8% vs. 38.8%), and fewer estrogen receptor–positive tumors (11.3% vs. 74.1%, OR, 22.4, P = .001) than the IDC group. Patients with MBC were treated with breast-conserving surgery less frequently than patients with IDC (38.5% vs. 55.8%, OR, 2.0, P = .001) because of the larger tumor size. Chemotherapy was used more often for patients with MBC (53.4% vs. 42.1%, OR, 1.6, P = .001) because of more advanced AJCC stage.

Conclusions

MBC is a rare tumor with different characteristics than IDC: it presents with larger tumor size, less nodal involvement, higher tumor grade, and hormone receptor negativity. Patients with MBC are treated more aggressively than IDC (more often with mastectomy and chemotherapy) because of a higher stage at presentation, but are being treated by the same principles as IDC. Follow-up will determine the long-term results of the current treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Solin LH, eds. (2000) International Classification of Diseases of Oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pitts WC, Rojas VA, Gaffey MJ, et al. Carcinomas with metaplasia and sarcomas of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 1991; 95:623–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kurian KM, Al-Nafussi Al. Sarcomatoid/metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathological study of 12 cases. Histopathology 2002; 40:58–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson TL, Kini SR. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: a cytohistologic and clinical study of 10 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 14:226–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gobbi H, Simpson JF, Borowsky A, Jensen RA, Page DL. Metaplastic breast tumors with a dominant fibromatosis-like phenotype have a high risk of local recurrence. Cancer 1999; 85:2170–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chao TC, Wang CS, Chen SC, Chen MF. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. J Surg Oncol 1999 ; 71:220–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellino R, Arisio R, D’Addato F, et al. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: pathology and clinical outcome. Anticancer Res 2003; 23:669–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wargotz ES, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. I. Matrix-producing carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1989; 20:628–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wargotz ES, Deos PH, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. II. Spindle cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1989; 20:732–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wargotz ES, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. III. Carcinosarcoma. Cancer 1989; 64:1490–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wargotz ES, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. IV. Squamous cell carcinoma of ductal origin. Cancer 1990; 65:272–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wargotz ES, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast: V. Metaplastic carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells. Hum Pathol 1990; 21:1142–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Park JM, Han BK, Moon WK, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28:179–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gunhan-Bilgen I, Memis A, Ustun EE, Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic, and sonographic findings with histopathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:1421–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, Wold LE, Ingle JN. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Ann Oncol 1999; 10:413–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oberman HA. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 29 patients. Am J Surg Pathol 1987; 11:918–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saxena S, Bansal A, Mohil RS, Bhatnagar D. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast—a rare breast tumour. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2004; 47:217–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huvos AG, Lucas JC Jr, Foote FW Jr. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: rare form of mammary cancer. NY State J Med 1973; 73:1078–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grechi G, Pagnini P. Study of mammary gland neoplasms with an osteocartilaginous component. I. Cartilaginous metaplastic epiphenomena in the course of connective tissue malignancy. Arch De Vecchi Anat Patol 1965; 46:277–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher M. Pezzi MD.

Additional information

*Members of the Breast Disease Site Team are listed in Appendix 1.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Members of the Breast Disease Site Team of the Commission on Cancer, American College of Surgeons, are as follows: Kirby Bland, MD (Leader)—Birmingham, AL; Robert Kuske, MD (Associate Leader)—Scottsdale, AZ; George Sledge, MD (Associate Leader)—Indianapolis, IN; Paul Baron, MD—Charleston, SC; James Connolly, MD—Boston, MA; Rosemary Duda, MD—Boston, MA; Timothy Eberlein, MD—St. Louis, MO; Stephen Edge, MD—Buffalo, NY; James Edney, MD—Omaha, NE; Suzanne Klimberg, MD—Little Rock, AR; A. Marilyn Leitch, MD—Dallas, TX; Joseph Lipscomb, PhD—Atlanta, GA; Lisa Newman, MD—Ann Arbor, MI; Geoffrey Robb, MD—Houston, TX; Edward Sickles, MD—San Francisco, CA; Sonja Eva Singletary, MD—Houston, TX; David P. Winchester, MD—Chicago, IL.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pezzi, C.M., Patel-Parekh, L., Cole, K. et al. Characteristics and Treatment of Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Analysis of 892 Cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 166–173 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9124-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9124-7

Keywords

Navigation