Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hospital Volume and Inpatient Mortality After Cancer-Related Gastrointestinal Resections: The Experience of an Asian Country

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Using 4-year nationwide population-based data for Taiwan, this study compared in-hospital surgical mortality rates with hospital volume for five cancer-related gastrointestinal resections.

Methods

The study sample was drawn from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 34,715 patients, each of whom had undergone a cancer-related colectomy, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, pancreatic resection, or liver lobectomy between 2000 and 2003, were selected as the study sample. The outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. The study sample was categorized into five patient groups for each procedure, and logistic regression analyses were performed for each procedure after adjustment for hospital and patient characteristics to assess the independent association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality.

Results

The adjusted odds ratios showed a steady decline in mortality rates for colectomy, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, and liver lobectomy with increasing hospital volume. The adjusted mortality odds for these four procedures in very-high-volume hospitals, relative to very-low-volume hospitals, ranged from .65 to .05. As regards pancreatic resection, after adjustment for patient, clinical, and hospital factors, no statistically significant association was discernible between hospital volume and the likelihood of mortality.

Conclusions

After adjustment for hospital and physician characteristics, in four of the five procedures, patients treated at higher-volume hospitals had lower in-hospital mortality rates than those treated at lower-volume hospitals. Our findings confirm, for the most part, the hypothesis that better outcomes are associated with higher-volume hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zacharias A, Schwann TA, Riordan CJ, et al. Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1961–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg 2004;240:586–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyerhardt JA, Catalano PJ, Schrag D, et al. Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:649–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho V, Heslin MJ. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2003;237:509–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, et al. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA 2000;283:1159–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Birkmeyer JD, Lucas FL, Wennberg DE. Potential benefits of regionalizing major surgery in Medicare patients. Eff Clin Pract 1999;2:277–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein AM. Volume and outcome—it is time to move ahead. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1161–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shackley P, Slack R, Booth A, et al. Is there a positive volume-outcome relationship in peripheral vascular surgery? Results of a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;20:326–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:511–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, et al. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002;131:6–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Lanschot JJ, Hulscher JB, Buskens CJ, et al. Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy. Cancer 2001;91:1574–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laks MP, Cohen T, Hack R. Volume of procedures at transplantation centers and mortality after liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, et al. Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery. Ann Surg 2003;238:161–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using general linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Birim O, Kappetein AP, Goorden T, van Klaveren RJ, Bogers AJ. Proper treatment selection may improve survival in patients with clinical early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;8:1021–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boruk M, Chernobilsky B, Rosenfeld RM, Har-El G. Age as a prognostic factor for complications of major head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:605–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res 1987;22:157–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 1979;301:1364–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, et al. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 1995;222:638–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, et al. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999;125:250–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zgodzinski W, Dekoj T, Espat NJ. Understanding clinical issues in postoperative nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20:654–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Velanovich V. Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:95–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Konety BR, Dhawan V, Allareddy V, et al. Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality from radical cystectomy: data from the health care utilization project. J Urol 2005;173:1695–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is based in part on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health and managed by the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. The interpretations and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health, or the National Health Research Institutes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herng-Ching Lin PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, HC., Xirasagar, S., Lee, HC. et al. Hospital Volume and Inpatient Mortality After Cancer-Related Gastrointestinal Resections: The Experience of an Asian Country. Ann Surg Oncol 13, 1182–1188 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9005-0

Keywords

Navigation