Skip to main content

Tumor angiogenesis in lymph node-negative rectal cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis

Abstract

Background: Intratumoral microvessel density (MVD) could be used as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the value of microvessel count in predicting the clinical outcome of stage I and II (Dukes A and B) rectal cancer patients.

Methods: Eighty-four patients who had undergone curative resection of lymph node-negative rectal cancer were included. Tumor type and differentiation, the depth of local invasion, venous invasion, the character of the invasive margin, and the degree of lymphocytic infiltration were evaluated for each tumor specimen. Immunohistochemical staining for the CD31 endothelial antigen was performed to highlight the microvessels.

Results: The median value of MVD was 45 microvessels. Low MVD (microvessels ≤45) was observed in 41 patients (48.8%), and high MVD (>45) was found in 43 (51.2%). The presence of conspicuous lymphocytic infiltration was significantly associated with increased vessel density. With uni- and multivariate survival analysis MVD did not show any prognostic significance. The character of the invasive margin was the only parameter with independent prognostic value.

Conclusions: MVD does not seem to provide any additional prognostic information when compared with standard histopathological parameters in lymph node-negative rectal cancer. It is likely that the strong association between MVD and the presence of conspicuous lymphocytic infiltration may interfere with its predictive value.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Folkman J. What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent?J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:4–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Folkman J, Watson K, Ingber D, Hanahan D. Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia.Nature 1989;338:58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrara N, Houck K, Jakeman L, Leung DW. Molecular and biological properties of vascular endothelial growth factor family of proteins.Endocr Rev 1992;13:18–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Basilico C, Moscatelli D. The FGF family of growth factors and oncogenes.Adv Cancer Res 1992;59:115–65.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishikawa F, Miyazono K, Hellman U, et al. Identification of angiogenic activity and the cloning and expression of platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor.Nature 1989;338:557–62.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bikfalvi A. Significance of angiogenesis in tumor progression and metastasis.Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:1101–4.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blood CH, Zetter BR. Tumor interaction with the vasculature: angiogenesis and tumor metastases.Biochim Biophys Acta 1990;1032:89–118.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Folkman J. Angiogenesis and breast cancer.J Clin Oncol 1994;121:441–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bosari S, Lee AKC, DeLellis RA, Wiley BD, Heatley GJ, Silverman ML. Microvessel quantitation and prognosis in invasive breast carcinoma.Hum Pathol 1992;23:755–61.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma.N Engl J Med 1991;324:1–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Macchiarini P, Fontanini G, Hardin MJ, Squartini F, Angeletti CA. Relation of neovascularization to metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer.Lancet 1992;340:145–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Srivastava A, Laidler P, Davies RP, Horgan K, Hughes LE. The prognostic significance of tumor vascularity in intermediate-thickness (0.76–4.00 mm thick) skin melanoma.Am J Pathol 1988;133:419–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomisaki S, Ohno S, Ichiyoshi Y, Kuwano H, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K. Microvessel quantification and its possible relation with liver metastasis in colorectal cancer.Cancer 1996;77:1722–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saclarides TJ, Speziale NJ, Drab E, Szeluga DJ, Rubin DB. Tumor angiogenesis and rectal carcinoma.Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:921–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Takebayashi Y, Akiyama S, Yamada K, Akiba S, Aikou T. Angiogenesis as an unfavorable prognostic factor in human colorectal carcinoma.Cancer 1996;78:226–31.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanigawa N, Amaya H, Matsumura M, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and mode of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer.Cancer Res 1997;57:1043–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Frank RE, Saclarides TJ, Leurgans S, Speziale NJ, Drab EA, Rubin DB. Tumor angiogenesis as a predictor of recurrence and survival in patients with node-negative colon cancer.Ann Surg 1995;222:695–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Takahashi Y, Tucker SL, Kitadai Y, et al. Vessel counts and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic factors in node-negative colon cancer.Arch Surg 1997;132:541–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Banner BF, Whitehouse R, Baker SP, Swanson RS. Tumor angiogenesis in stage II colorectal carcinoma. Association with survival.Am J Clin Pathol 1998;109:733–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hermanek P. Impact of surgeon’s technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma.Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:559–62.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jass JR, Sobin LH. Histological typing of intestinal tumors. In: Jass JR, Sobin LH, eds.WHO International Histological Classification of Tumors. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. American Joint Committee on Cancer.AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Talbot IC, Ritchie S, Leighton MH, Hughes AO, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. Spread of rectal cancer within veins: histologic features and clinical significance.Am J Surg 1981;141:15–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jass JR, Love S, Northover JM. A new prognostic classification for rectal cancer.Lancet 1987;1:1303–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplan E, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations.J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cox DR. Regression model and life tables.J R Stat Soc B 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer.N Engl J Med 1997;336:980–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zaheer S, Pemberton JH, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup D. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.Ann Surg 1998;227:800–11.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Påhlman L. Improved survival and reduction in local failure rates after preoperative radiotherapy. Evidence for the generalizability of the results of Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial.Ann Surg 1999;229:493–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Giatromanolaki A, Stathopoulos GP, Tsiobanou E, et al. Combined role of tumor angiogenesis, bcl-2, and p53 expression in the prognosis of patients with colorectal carcinoma.Cancer 1999;86:1421–30.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Giatromanolaki A, Koukourakis M, Theodossiou D, Barbatis C, Harris AL, Gatter KC. Comparative evaluation of angiogenesis assessment with anti-factor-VIII and anti-CD31 immunostaining in non-small cell lung cancer.Clin Cancer Res 1997;179:80–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Anastassiou G, Duensing S, Steinhoff G, et al. Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1): a potential prognostic marker involved in leukocyte infiltration of renal cell carcinoma.Oncology 1996;53:127–32.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Byrne KJ, Dalgleish AG, Browning MJ, Steward WP, Harris AL. The relationship between angiogenesis and the immune response in carcinogenesis and the progression of malignant disease.Eur J Cancer 2000;36:151–69.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Giatromanolaki A, Koukourakis MI, Kakolyris S, et al. Focal expression of thymidine phosphorylase associates with CD31 positive lymphocytic aggregation and local neo-angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer.Anticancer Res 1998;18:71–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Leek RD, Landers RJ, Harris AL, Lewis CE. Necrosis correlates with high vascular density and focal macrophage infiltration in invasive carcinoma of the breast.Br J Cancer 1999;79:991–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Takahashi Y, Bucana CD, Liu W, et al. Platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor in human colon cancer angiogenesis: role of infiltrating cells.J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1146–51.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Saito S, Tsuno N, Nagawa H, et al. Expression of platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor correlates with good prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinoma.Cancer 2000;88:42–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jass JR. Lymphocytic infiltration and survival in rectal cancer.J Clin Pathol 1986;39:585–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fisher ER, Robinsky B, Sass R, Fisher B. Relative prognostic value of the Dukes and the Jass systems in rectal cancer: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Projects (Protocol R-01).Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:944–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dundas SA, Laing RW, O’Cathain A, et al. Feasibility of new prognostic classification for rectal cancer.J Clin Pathol 1988;41:1273–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Secco GB, Fardelli R, Campora E, et al. Prognostic value of the Jass histopathological classification in left colon and rectal cancer: a multivariate analysis.Digestion 1990;47:71–80.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, et al. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumors: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation.Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:2474–84.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Vermeulen PB, Verhoeven D, Fierens H, et al. Microvessel quantification in primary colorectal carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study.Br J Cancer 1995;71:340–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Cianchi MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cianchi, F., Palomba, A., Messerini, L. et al. Tumor angiogenesis in lymph node-negative rectal cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 9, 20–26 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1245/aso.2002.9.1.20

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/aso.2002.9.1.20

Key Words

  • Rectal cancer
  • Angiogenesis
  • Lymphocytic infiltration
  • Prognosis