Abstract
Background: The TNM and Japanese classifications of regional lymph node spread (N categories) for gastric cancer differ, whereas the classifications of local extent (T categories) are identical. This study was designed to compare these staging systems and devise a more rational system for gastric carcinoma.
Methods: A series of 1244 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. Survival rates were evaluated to clarify which aspects of each staging system (feasibility, reproducibility, and accuracy of prognostic stratification) were superior.
Results: The TNM and Japanese classification systems differ in their categorizations of lymph node spread. A significant difference in survival rate was observed in lymph node metastasis classified as N1 and N2 by the Japanese classification and then subclassified by the TNM classification, although there was no significant difference in the survival in cases of lymph node metastasis classified by TNM into pN1 and pN2 and then subclassified by the Japanese classification. Among patients with M1 metastasis (number 16 a2 and b1 in Japanese classification) in the TNM classification, there was a significant difference in survival. A new classification that included the para-aortic lymph nodes (number 16 a2 and b1) as regional lymph nodes within the TNM classification provided homogeneity and an improvement in staging.
Conclusions: TNM classification was more rational and homogenous than Japanese classification. New classification could lead to worldwide uniformity in the description of patients and make possible uniform interinstitutional comparisons of surgical results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. In: Gastric Cancer. 2nd English ed. 1998:10–24.
Sobin LH, Wittenkind CH, eds. International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley-Liss, 2002.
de Manzoni G, Verlato G, Guglielmi A, Laterza E, Genna M, Cordiano C. Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1604–1607.
Adachi Y, Kamakura T, Mori M, Baba H, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K. Prognostic significance of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 1994;81:414–416.
Boku T, Nakane Y, Okumura S, et al. A clinical study of adequate lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer from the aspect of the location of cancer. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 1992;25:7–13.
Kunisaki C, Yamaoka H, Wakasugi J, et al. Lymphatic flow using activated carbon particles in lymph node metastasis and skip metastasis in gastric cancer. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 1997;30:2127–2133.
Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, et al. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer 1999;86:553–558.
Katai H, Yoshimura K, Maruyama K, Sasako M, Sano T. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Cancer 2000;88:1796–80.
Fujii K, Isozaki K, Okajima K, et al. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Br J Surgery 1999;86:685–689.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kunisaki, C., Shimada, H., Nomura, M. et al. Comparative Evaluation of Gastric Carcinoma Staging: Japanese Classification Versus New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification. Ann Surg Oncol 11, 203–206 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.06.012
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.06.012