Advertisement

Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with an Increased Risk of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism After Distal Pancreatectomy

  • Brent A. Willobee
  • Austin R. Dosch
  • Casey J. Allen
  • Francisco I. Macedo
  • Tyler S. Bartholomew
  • Omar Picado
  • Alex A. Gaidarski
  • Vikas Dudeja
  • Danny Yakoub
  • Nipun B. MerchantEmail author
Pancreatic Tumors
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, the influence of operative technique on VTE risk after DP is unknown.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the MIS technique versus the open technique and the development of postoperative VTE after DP.

Methods

Patients who underwent DP from 2014 to 2015 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pancreas-specific database. Multivariable logistic regression was then used to identify independent associations with the development of postoperative VTE after DP.

Results

A total of 3558 patients underwent DP during this time period. Of these cases, 47.8% (n = 1702) were performed via the MIS approach. After adjusting for significant covariates, the MIS approach was independently associated with the development of any VTE (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–2.40; p = 0.025), as well as increasing the risk of developing a postdischarge VTE (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05–3.08; p = 0.033) when compared with the open approach. There was an association between VTE and the development of numerous postoperative complications, including pneumonia, unplanned intubation, need for prolonged mechanical ventilation, and cardiac arrest.

Conclusion

Compared with the open approach, the MIS approach is associated with higher rates of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing DP. The majority of these events are diagnosed after hospital discharge.

Notes

Acknowledgment

Special acknowledgment must go to Deukwoo Kwon, PhD, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.

Disclosures

Brent A. Willobee, Austin R. Dosch, Casey J. Allen, Francisco I. Macedo, Tyler S. Bartholomew, Omar Picado, Alex A. Gaidarski, Vikas Dudeja, Danny Yakoub, and Nipun B. Merchant have no relevant financial or commercial interests to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Ollendorf DA, Vera-Llonch M, Oster G. Cost of venous thromboembolism following major orthopedic surgery in hospitalized patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59(18):1750–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruppert A, Steinle T, Lees M. Economic burden of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Med Econ. 2011;14(1):65–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, et al. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(6):585–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):809–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albayati MA, Grover SP, Saha P, et al. Postsurgical inflammation as a causative mechanism of venous thromboembolism. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015;41(6):615–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinke CE, Drebin JA, Kreider S, et al. Timing of preoperative pharmacoprophylaxis for pancreatic surgery patients: a venous thromboembolism reduction initiative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):19–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Martino RR, Goodney PP, Spangler EL, et al. Variation in thromboembolic complications among patients undergoing commonly performed cancer operations. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(4):1035–40. e4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):270–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sugiura H, Morikawa T, Kaji M, et al. Long-term benefits for the quality of life after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with lung cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1999;9(6):403–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurmann A, Visth E, Candinas D, et al. Long-term follow-up of open and laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):297–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kantor O, Bryan DS, Talamonti MS, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for cancer provides oncologic outcomes and overall survival identical to open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(10):1620–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosok BI, de Rooij T, van Hilst J, et al. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(3):205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Catheline JM, Capelluto E, Gaillard JL, et al. Thromboembolism prophylaxis and incidence of thromboembolic complications after laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg Investig. 2000;2(1):41–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caprini JA, Arcelus JI, Laubach M, et al. Postoperative hypercoagulability and deep-vein thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(3):304–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen NT, Cronan M, Braley S, et al. Duplex ultrasound assessment of femoral venous flow during laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(2):285–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tzeng CW, Katz MH, Lee JE, et al. Predicting the risks of venous thromboembolism versus post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage: analysis of 13,771 NSQIP patients. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(4):373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tzeng CW, Katz MH, Fleming JB, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism outweighs post-hepatectomy bleeding complications: analysis of 5651 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patients. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14(8):506–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, et al. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(3):280–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mukherjee D, Lidor AO, Chu KM, et al. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rates vary significantly after different types of major abdominal operations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(11):2015–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beal EW, Tumin D, Chakedis J, et al. Identification of patients at high risk for post-discharge venous thromboembolism after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: which patients benefit from extended thromboprophylaxis? HPB (Oxford). 2018;20(7):621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shapiro R, Vogel JD, Kiran RP. Risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: an additional benefit of the minimally invasive approach? Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(12):1496–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Fayad C, et al. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism compared with open surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):1021–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, et al. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery. 2010;148(4):625–35. discussion 35–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buchberg B, Masoomi H, Lusby K, et al. Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery: does laparoscopy impart an advantage? Arch Surg. 2011;146(6):739–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Carmichael JC, et al. A nationwide analysis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in colon and rectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(12):2169–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beebe DS, McNevin MP, Crain JM, et al. Evidence of venous stasis after abdominal insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;176(5):443–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Catheline JM, Turner R, Gaillard JL, et al. Thromboembolism in laparoscopic surgery: risk factors and preventive measures. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1999;9(2):135–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wazz G, Branicki F, Taji H, et al. Influence of pneumoperitoneum on the deep venous system during laparoscopy. JSLS. 2000;4(4):291–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ohzato H, Yoshizaki K, Nishimoto N, et al. Interleukin-6 as a new indicator of inflammatory status: detection of serum levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein after surgery. Surgery. 1992;111(2):201–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gupta A, Watson DI. Effect of laparoscopy on immune function. Br J Surg. 2001;88(10):1296–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buunen M, Gholghesaei M, Veldkamp R, et al. Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(7):1022–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e227S-e77S.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lyman GH, Bohlke K, Falanga A, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):e442–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Irani M, Prabakar C, Nematian S, et al. Patient perceptions of open, laparoscopic, and robotic gynecological surgeries. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4284093.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moloo H, Haggar F, Martel G, et al. The adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a national survey of general surgeons. Can J Surg. 2009;52(6):455–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Amin AN, Stemkowski S, Lin J, et al. Inpatient thromboprophylaxis use in U.S. hospitals: adherence to the seventh American College of Chest Physician’s recommendations for at-risk medical and surgical patients. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(8):E15–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kalka C, Spirk D, Siebenrock KA, et al. Lack of extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk patients undergoing major orthopaedic or major cancer surgery. Electronic assessment of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk surgical patients at discharge from Swiss hospitals (ESSENTIAL). Thromb Haemost. 2009;102(1):56–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kamath AS, Sarr MG, Nagorney DM, et al. Portal venous thrombosis after distal pancreatectomy: clinical outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(4):656–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brent A. Willobee
    • 1
  • Austin R. Dosch
    • 1
  • Casey J. Allen
    • 2
  • Francisco I. Macedo
    • 3
  • Tyler S. Bartholomew
    • 4
  • Omar Picado
    • 1
  • Alex A. Gaidarski
    • 1
  • Vikas Dudeja
    • 5
    • 6
  • Danny Yakoub
    • 7
  • Nipun B. Merchant
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Division of Surgery, Surgical OncologyUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Surgical OncologyUniversity of Central Florida College of MedicineOrlandoUSA
  4. 4.University of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  5. 5.Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Jackson Memorial Hospital/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  6. 6.Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterMiamiUSA
  7. 7.Department of Surgery, Surgical OncologyUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations