Abstract
Purpose
Both body mass index (BMI) and breast density impact breast cancer risk in the general population. Whether obesity and density represent additive risk factors in women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is unknown.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with LCIS from 1988 to 2017 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. BMI was categorized by World Health Organization classification. Density was captured as the mammographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) value. Other covariates included age at LCIS diagnosis, menopausal status, family history, chemoprevention, and prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer-free probability was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox regression models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses.
Results
A total of 1222 women with LCIS were identified. At a median follow-up of 7 years, 179 women developed breast cancer (121 invasive, 58 ductal carcinoma in situ); 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences of breast cancer were 10% and 17%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, increased breast density (BIRADS C/D vs. A/B) was significantly associated with increased hazard of breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–3.88), whereas BMI was not. On multivariable analysis, chemoprevention use was associated with a significantly decreased hazard of breast cancer (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29–0.84). Exploratory analyses did not demonstrate significant interaction between BMI and menopausal status, BMI and breast density, BMI and chemoprevention use, or breast density and chemoprevention.
Conclusions
Breast cancer risk among women with LCIS is impacted by breast density. These results aid in personalizing risk assessment among women with LCIS and highlight the importance of chemoprevention counseling for risk reduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rosen PP, Kosloff C, Lieberman PH, Adair F, Braun DW, Jr. Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: Detailed analysis of 99 patients with average follow-up of 24 years. Am J Surg Pathol. 1978;2(3):225–51.
Page DL, Kidd TE Jr, Dupont WD, Simpson JF, Rogers LW. Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease. Hum Pathol. 1991;22(12):1232–9.
Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(3):146–51.
Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS. Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer. 1985;55(11):2698–708.
Coopey SB, Mazzola E, Buckley JM, et al. The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(3):627–33.
King TA, Pilewskie M, Muhsen S, et al. Lobular carcinoma in situ: a 29-year longitudinal experience evaluating clinicopathologic features and breast cancer risk. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(33):3945–52.
Hussain M, Cunnick GH. Management of lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia of the breast: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(4):279–89.
Frykberg ER. Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Breast J. 1999;5(5):296–303.
Cheng P, Huang Q, Shou J, Hu G, Han M, Huang J. Treatment and survival outcomes of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: a SEER population based study. Oncotarget. 2017;8(61):103047–54.
Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE. Changing incidence of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;75(3):259–68.
Portschy PR, Marmor S, Nzara R, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM. Trends in incidence and management of lobular carcinoma in situ: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(10):3240–6.
Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):227–36.
Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, et al. Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(6):217.
McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1159–69.
Tice JA, O’Meara ES, Weaver DL, Vachon C, Ballard-Barbash R, Kerlikowske K. Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(14):1043–9.
Reimers LL, Crew KD, Terry MB. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(13):1270–1.
Vierkant RA, Degnim AC, Radisky DC, et al. Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia: an observational cohort study from the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease (BBD) cohort. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):84.
Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton LA, et al. Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12(2):103–10.
Hudson S, Vik Hjerkind K, Vinnicombe S, et al. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res. 2018;20(1):156.
Soguel L, Durocher F, Tchernof A, Diorio C. Adiposity, breast density, and breast cancer risk: epidemiological and biological considerations. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017;26(6):511–20.
Baglietto L, Krishnan K, Stone J, et al. Associations of mammographic dense and nondense areas and body mass index with risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(4):475–83.
Hart V, Reeves KW, Sturgeon SR, et al. The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24(11):1724–30.
Huang Z, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, et al. Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA. 1997;278(17):1407–11.
Schoemaker MJ, Nichols HB, Wright LB, et al. Association of body mass index and age with subsequent breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(11):e181771.
King TA, Muhsen S, Patil S, et al. Is there a role for routine screening MRI in women with LCIS? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142(2):445–53.
Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Scott CG, et al. The contributions of breast density and common genetic variation to breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(5).
American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS® Atlas) teR, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013.
Chun J, El-Tamer M, Joseph KA, Ditkoff BA, Schnabel F. Predictors of breast cancer development in a high-risk population. Am J Surg. 2006;192(4):474–7.
Cecchini RS, Costantino JP, Cauley JA, et al. Body mass index and the risk for developing invasive breast cancer among high-risk women in NSABP P-1 and STAR breast cancer prevention trials. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012;5(4):583–92.
Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(18):1371–88.
Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial: Preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3(6):696–706.
Ropka ME, Keim J, Philbrick JT. Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):3090–5.
Roetzheim RG, Lee JH, Fulp W, et al. Acceptance and adherence to chemoprevention among women at increased risk of breast cancer. Breast. 2015;24(1):51–6.
Roche CA, Tang R, Coopey SB, Hughes KS. Chemoprevention acceptance and adherence in women with high-risk breast lesions. Breast J. 2019;25(2):190–5.
Flanagan MR, Zabor EC, Stempel M, Mangino DA, Morrow M, Pilewskie ML. Chemoprevention uptake for breast cancer risk reduction varies by risk factor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019.
DeCensi A PM, Guerrieri Gonzaga A, Avino F, Cortesi L, Donadio M, Pacquola M, Falcini F, Gulisano M, Digennaro M, Tienghi A, Cagossi K, Pinotti G, Varicchio C, Caviglia S, Boni L, Bonanni BEO. A randomized placebo controlled phase III trial of low dose tamoxifen for the prevention of recurrence in women with operated hormone sensitive breast ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. 2018;abstract GS3-01.
Cheraghi Z, Poorolajal J, Hashem T, Esmailnasab N, Doosti Irani A. Effect of body mass index on breast cancer during premenopausal and postmenopausal periods: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51446.
Nakhlis F, Gilmore L, Gelman R, et al. Incidence of adjacent synchronous invasive carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: results from a prospective multi-institutional registry (TBCRC 020). Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(3):722–8.
Acknowledgments
The preparation of this study was funded in part by NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant No. P30 CA008748 to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. This study was presented in podium format at the Society of Surgical Oncology 72nd Annual Cancer Symposium, March 27–30, 2019, San Diego, CA. Dr. Tari A. King has received honoraria as a speaker for Genomic Health
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All other authors have no conflict of interest disclosures to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minami, C.A., Zabor, E.C., Gilbert, E. et al. Do Body Mass Index and Breast Density Impact Cancer Risk Among Women with Lobular Carcinoma In Situ?. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 1844–1851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08126-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08126-9