Advertisement

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Tumor Recurrence in Patients with Early T-Stage Cancer of the Lower Rectum

  • Ian P. HayesEmail author
  • Elasma Milanzi
  • Peter Gibbs
  • Jeanette C. Reece
Colorectal Cancer

Abstract

Background

The role neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plays in oncological outcomes in early T-stage rectal cancer is uncertain. The present work aims to clarify prognostic outcomes by estimating the effect of nCRT on tumor recurrence prior to major surgery compared with major surgery alone.

Patients and Methods

Prospectively collected data were retrospectively analyzed for patients diagnosed with localized rectal adenocarcinoma ≤ 8 cm from the anal verge, with final histopathology ≤ T2 (≤ ypT2/≤ pT2), regardless of magnetic resonance imaging staging, between 1990 and 2017. As the effect of nCRT on recurrence varied over time, thereby violating the Cox proportional hazards assumption, the effect of nCRT on recurrence hazards was estimated using a time-varying multivariate Cox model over two separate time intervals (≤ 1 year and > 1 year postsurgery) by nCRT.

Results

Long-course nCRT was associated with a 5.6-fold increase in the hazard of recurrence ≤ 1 year postsurgery [hazard ratio (HR) 5.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–24.9; P = 0.02], but there was no increase in recurrence hazards > 1 year (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.4–2.0; P = 0.70). In subgroup analysis restricted to ≤ mrT2/≤ ypT2 and ≤ pT2 tumors (omitting > mrT2 tumors), the effect of nCRT on recurrence no longer varied over time, indicating that tumor heterogeneity was responsible for the observed increased recurrence hazards ≤ 1 year postsurgery; That is, > mrT2 tumors that were downstaged to ≤ ypT2 after nCRT were responsible for the time-varying effects of nCRT and increased recurrence hazards ≤ 1 year postsurgery. Subsequently, no difference was found in prognostic outcomes either with or without nCRT before surgery in the homogeneous population of ≤ mrT2/≤ ypT2 and ≤ pT2 tumors.

Conclusions

No evidence was found to indicate that nCRT prior to surgery reduces tumor recurrence in early T-stage lower rectal cancer compared with surgery alone.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge BioGrid Australia for providing the data for this study.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed substantially to conception and design, analysis of data, and drafting, critical revision, and final approval of the manuscript.

Funding

J.C.R. is a recipient of a National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Peter Doherty early career research fellowship (APP1120081). E.M. is funded by the Victorian Centre for Biostatistics.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

BioGrid data were collected from patients’ clinical notes, supported by radiology and histopathology reports. Study ethics approval was obtained from Melbourne Health/BioGrid HREC, No. BG-201709/1. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for Publication

This manuscript does not contain any individual personal data in any form, so consent for publication is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):535–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pilipshen SJ, Heilweil M, Quan SH, Sternberg SS, Enker WE. Patterns of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal cancer. Cancer. 1984;53(6):1354–62.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NICE. Colorectal cancer. The diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer. London: NICE; 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Midura EF, Jung AD, Daly MC, et al. Cancer center volume and type impact stage-specific utilization of neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(8):1906–12.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Wouters MW, et al. Evaluating national practice of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer based on clinical auditing. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(9):1000–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morris EJ, Finan PJ, Spencer K, et al. Wide variation in the use of radiotherapy in the management of surgically treated rectal cancer across the English National Health Service. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016;28(8):522–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging—a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2004;232(3):773–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Folkesson J, Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Cedermark B, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: long lasting benefits from radiotherapy on survival and local recurrence rate. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5644–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):638–46.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cox D. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187–220.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Natarajan L, Pu M, Parker BA, et al. Time-varying effects of prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival in breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(12):1463–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang M, Peng P, Gu K, et al. Time-varying effects of prognostic factors associated with long-term survival in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018;25(5):509–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bellera CA, MacGrogan G, Debled M, de Lara CT, Brouste V, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. Variables with time-varying effects and the Cox model: some statistical concepts illustrated with a prognostic factor study in breast cancer. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Werdyani S, Yu Y, Skardasi G, et al. Germline INDELs and CNVs in a cohort of colorectal cancer patients: their characteristics, associations with relapse-free survival time, and potential time-varying effects on the risk of relapse. Cancer Med. 2017;6(6):1220–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giorgi R, Abrahamowicz M, Quantin C, et al. A relative survival regression model using B-spline functions to model non-proportional hazards. Stat Med. 2003;22(17):2767–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu Y, Carey M, Pollett W, et al. The long-term survival characteristics of a cohort of colorectal cancer patients and baseline variables associated with survival outcomes with or without time-varying effects. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):150.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baulies S, Belin L, Mallon P, et al. Time-varying effect and long-term survival analysis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(1):30–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jatoi I, Bandos H, Jeong JH, et al. Time-varying effects of breast cancer adjuvant systemic therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(1):djv304.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dignam JJ, Dukic V, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N. Hazard of recurrence and adjuvant treatment effects over time in lymph node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116(3):595–602.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    BioGrid Australia. https://www.biogrid.org.au/.
  21. 21.
    Zubizarreta E, Van Dyk J, Lievens Y. Analysis of global radiotherapy needs and costs by geographic region and income level. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017;29(2):84–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Braendengen M, Tveit KM, Bruheim K, Cvancarova M, Berglund A, Glimelius B. Late patient-reported toxicity after preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer: results from a randomized Phase III study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(4):1017–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Askoxylakis V, et al. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(13):4169–82.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U, Glimelius B. Late adverse effects of radiation therapy for rectal cancer—a systematic overview. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(4):504–16.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(9):1847–58.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Field K, Kosmider S, Johns J, et al. Linking data from hospital and cancer registry databases: should this be standard practice? Intern Med J. 2010;40(8):566–73.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patel SV, Roxburgh CS, Vakiani E, et al. Distance to the anal verge is associated with pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(5):637–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Han YD, Kim WR, Park SW, et al. Predictors of pathologic complete response in rectal cancer patients undergoing total mesorectal excision after preoperative chemoradiation. Medicine. 2015;94(45):e1971.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(11):1114–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wheeler JM, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ, et al. Quantification of histologic regression of rectal cancer after irradiation: a proposal for a modified staging system. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(8):1051–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric-estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53(282):457–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pettitt AN, Bin Daud I. Investigating time dependence in Cox’s proportional hazards model. Appl Stat. 1990;39:313–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2013.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Keane C, Young M. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(10):758–62.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McCarthy K, Pearson K, Fulton R, Hewitt J. Pre-operative chemoradiation for non-metastatic locally advanced rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD008368.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Habr-Gama A, Perez RO. Non-operative management of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Br J Surg. 2009;96(2):125–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):711–7 (discussion 717–8).PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Beets GL, Figueiredo NL, Habr-Gama A, van de Velde CJ. A new paradigm for rectal cancer: organ preservation: introducing the international watch & wait database (IWWD). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(12):1562–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Du CZ, Chen YC, Cai Y, Xue WC, Gu J. Oncologic outcomes of primary and post-irradiated early stage rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21 2011;17(27):3229–34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Park IJ, You YN, Agarwal A, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(15):1770–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lu Z, Cheng P, Yang F, Zheng Z, Wang X. Long-term outcomes in patients with ypT0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative resection. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30(2):272–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Altman DG, De Stavola BL, Love SB, Stepniewska KA. Review of survival analyses published in cancer journals. Br J Cancer. 1995;72(2):511–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wan JF, Zhu J, Li GC, Sun WJ, Zhang Z. YpT1–2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation has lower survival compared with pT1–2N0 rectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(38):41056–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yeop Oh S, Bae Kim Y, Wook Suh K. Oncologic outcome of ypT1–2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with pT1–2N0 rectal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2017;40(5):512–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(9):835–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dossa F, Acuna SA, Rickles AS, et al. Association between adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer and pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(7):930–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(7):918–28.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zorcolo L, Rosman AS, Restivo A, et al. Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(9):2822–32.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bujko K, Kolodziejczyk M, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, et al. Tumour regression grading in patients with residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95(3):298–302.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Garcia VM, Batlle JF, Casado E, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumour regression grade for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(9):989–98.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Beddy D, Hyland JM, Winter DC, et al. A simplified tumor regression grade correlates with survival in locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(12):3471–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian P. Hayes
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Elasma Milanzi
    • 3
    • 4
  • Peter Gibbs
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Jeanette C. Reece
    • 3
    • 8
  1. 1.Colorectal Surgery Unit, Suite 2, Private Medical CentreRoyal Melbourne HospitalParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneCarltonAustralia
  4. 4.Victorian Centre for BiostatisticsMelbourneAustralia
  5. 5.Personalised Oncology DivisionThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchParkvilleAustralia
  6. 6.Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health SciencesThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  7. 7.Department of Medical OncologyWestern HealthMelbourneAustralia
  8. 8.The University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer ResearchThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations