The Impact of Margin Status on Breast Conservation Rates
- 86 Downloads
Contemporary data indicate that breast conservation treatment (BCT) results in superior survival outcomes compared with mastectomy. However, positive margins after lumpectomy have implications for local control, and re-excisions are recommended to achieve negative margins. The need for reoperations after an initial attempt at BCT is associated with higher chance of conversion to mastectomy. Achieving negative margins at the first therapeutic surgical procedure is therefore critical to optimise BCT rates and survival outcomes.
A compilation of scientific reports on BCT, margin status, rates of reoperation, and the impact on BCT rates was reviewed. Re-excision rates after initial lumpectomy is variable to a staggering degree and reported to be between 0 and 100%. High reoperation rates (ROR) are associated with higher likelihood of conversion to mastectomy, which may not confer favourable treatment outcomes. Although widely agreed that decreasing ROR is a desirable objective, there is controversy regarding the need for its urgent implementation as a quality metric. Critics of this cite challenges related to how this can be achieved and its attendant ramifications. On the other hand, without the appropriate incentive for quality improvement of surgical treatment of breast cancer, patients may be subject to poorer overall outcomes.
Techniques and approaches are discussed in this article to enable a reduction in positive margin status, and therefore ROR. The rationale for achieving ROR of 10–20% are explicated, as well as the impact this would have on BCT rates, which translates to better survival outcomes for women with breast cancer.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.NIH Consensus Conference. (No authors listed) JAMA. 1991;265:391–5.Google Scholar
- 17.Christiansen P, Carstensen SL, Ejlertsen, Kroman N, Offersen B, Bodilsen A, Jensen MB. Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival—a population-based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Acta Oncol. 2018;57:19–25.Google Scholar
- 18.Wang JY, Wang SL, Tang Y, Jing H, Sun GY, Jin J, et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes with breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy versus mastectomy for patients with stage I breast cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18:e975-84.Google Scholar
- 19.Corradini S, Reitz D, Pazos M, Schonecker S, Braun M, Harbeck N, et al. Mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer in real-life clinical practice: outcome comparison of 7565 cases. Cancers. 2019;11:160. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020160.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC) Standards Manual 2018 Edition. Page 27. https://accreditation.facs.org/accreditationdocuments/NAPBC/Portal%20Resources/2018NAPBCStandardsManual.pdf. Accessed 2018.
- 35.Obedian E, Haffty BG. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6:328–35.Google Scholar
- 41.Isaacs AJ, Gemignani ML, Pusic A, et al. Association of breast conservation surgery for cancer with 90-day reoperation rates in New York state. JAMA. 2016;151(7):648–55.Google Scholar
- 44.Kim SHH, Cornacchi SD, Heller B, Farrokhyar F, Babra M Lovrics PJ. An evaluation of intraoperative digital specimen mammography versus conventional specimen radiography of the excision of non-palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 2013;205:703.Google Scholar
- 46.Kaufman CS, Zacharia K, Rogers A, Nix S, et al. View for view, 3D specimen tomosynthesis provides more data than 2D specimen mammography. Abstract ID: 256719; SABS 2018.Google Scholar
- 52.Milligan R, Pieri A, Critchley A, Peace R, Lennard T, O’Donoghue JM, et al. Radioactive seed localisation compared with wire-guided localisation of non-palpable breast carcinoma in breast conservation surgery—the first experience in the United Kingdom. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Weber WP, Engelberger S Viehk CT, Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Kuster S, Dirnhofer S, et al. Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions. World J Surg. 2008;32:2599–606.Google Scholar