Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 1569–1576 | Cite as

Long-Term Outcomes Following Partial Versus Complete Cystectomy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer with Regarding to the Extent of Bladder Invasion

  • Takefumi YoshidaEmail author
  • Dai Shida
  • Hirokazu Taniguchi
  • Shunsuke Tsukamoto
  • Yukihide Kanemitsu
Urologic Oncology



Two procedures widely performed to treat locally advanced colorectal cancer adherent to the urinary bladder are total cystectomy (as part of pelvic exenteration) and partial cystectomy; however, little is known about outcomes following partial cystectomy.


A retrospective database of patients with colorectal cancer involving the urinary bladder who underwent R0 or R1 resection at our institution from 2001 to 2015 was constructed. The histological extent of bladder invasion and long-term outcomes were examined.


Of the 89 consecutive patients, 49 underwent partial cystectomy and all had negative margins of the bladder. Tumor invasion to the urinary bladder was confirmed histologically in 19 of 49 patients (coincidence rate of diagnosis, 39%): invasion only to the bladder serosa (n = 3), invasion to the bladder muscle (n = 4), and invasion beyond the bladder muscle without (n = 1) and with (n = 11) exposure to the bladder lumen. The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 63.2% and 70.2% in the partial cystectomy group, and 66.2% and 72.7% in the total cystectomy group (p = 0.567 and 0.648), respectively. Except for the remnant bladder, recurrence sites were very similar to sites observed in patients who underwent total cystectomy. Intravesical recurrence occurred in four patients 3–13 months after the initial surgery, all of whom showed bladder lumen exposure to the tumor.


With regard to long-term outcomes and low diagnostic concordance rates of clinical and pathological bladder invasion, partial cystectomy seems a generally acceptable treatment option. However, when the bladder lumen is exposed to a colorectal tumor, surgeons should be cognizant of possible intravesical recurrence and act accordingly.



The authors thank M. Moriya, T. Akasu, S. Fujita, S. Yamamoto, and H. Ochiai, all of whom were former staff members in our division. The authors also thank their colleagues and nurses who provided patient care.


None declared.


  1. 1.
    Milowsky MI, Rumble RB, Booth CM, et al. Guideline on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (European Association of Urology Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1945–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chou R, Selph SS, Buckley DI, et al. Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Cancer 2016; 122:842–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luo HL, Tsai KL, Lin SE, Chiang PH. Outcome of urinary bladder recurrence after partial cystectomy for en bloc urinary bladder adherent colorectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28:631–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li JC, Chong CC, Ng SS, Yiu RY, Lee JF, Leung KL. En bloc urinary bladder resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer: a 17-year experience. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26:1169–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS, Zhang S, Tang ZJ, Liang JL. Outcome of surgical management of the bladder in advanced colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22:21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winter DC, Walsh R, Lee G, Kiely D, O’Riordain MG, O’Sullivan GC. Local involvement of the urinary bladder in primary colorectal cancer: outcome with en-bloc resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lehnert T, Methner M, Pollok A, Schaible A, Hinz U, Herfarth C. Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer: an analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients. Ann Surg 2002; 235:217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Croner RS, Merkel S, Papadopoulos T, Schellerer V, Hohenberger W, Goehl J. Multivisceral resection for colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52:1381–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carne PW, Frye JN, Kennedy-Smith A, et al. Local invasion of the bladder with colorectal cancers: surgical management and patterns of local recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stief CG, Jonas U, Raab R. Long-term follow-up after surgery for advanced colorectal carcinoma involving the urogenital tract. Eur Urol 2002; 41:546–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Union for International Cancer Control. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed. New York: John; 2017.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woranisarakul V, Ramart P, Phinthusophon K, Chotikawanich E, Prapasrivorakul S, Lohsiriwat V. Accuracy of preoperative urinary symptoms, urinalysis, computed tomography and cystoscopic findings for the diagnosis of urinary bladder invasion in patients with colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15:7241–7244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mariani PP, van Pelt JF, Ectors N, Topal B, D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Rectal washout with cytotoxic solution can be extended to the whole colon. Br J Surg 2002; 89:1540–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takefumi Yoshida
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dai Shida
    • 1
  • Hirokazu Taniguchi
    • 2
  • Shunsuke Tsukamoto
    • 1
  • Yukihide Kanemitsu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Colorectal SurgeryNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Division of Pathology and Clinical LaboratoriesNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations