Immediate Reconstruction Swing Room Scheduling Reduces Wait Times to Surgery and Increases Breast Reconstruction Rates

  • Elaine McKevittEmail author
  • Urve Kuusk
  • Carol Dingee
  • Rebecca Warburton
  • Jin-Si Pao
  • Nancy Y. Van Laeken
  • Esta S. Bovill
Reconstructive Oncology



Despite benefits in quality of life, patient satisfaction, overall healthcare costs, and number of surgeries, historically fewer than 30% of patients undergo immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer. A paucity of qualified oncologic and plastic surgeons coupled with inefficient use of operating room (OR) resources presents challenges in offering immediate breast reconstruction in a timely manner. To address these challenges, an immediate reconstruction swing room (IRSW) program was developed.


IRSW scheduling leverages two concurrently running ORs, with the surgical oncologist and plastic surgeon moving between rooms to complete 2–4 combined mastectomy cases with immediate reconstruction, in addition to 1–2 independent cases, each operative day. The final year of traditional booking was compared with IRSW scheduling to assess wait times and reconstruction rates.


Comparing the 2 years, fewer surgical breast cases were performed with IRSW scheduling (1250 vs. 1178), however the overall number of oncology cases increased from 735 (59%) to 857 (73%). The number of immediate reconstructions performed increased from 75 to 139 (p < 0.0001), which reflects a mean of 1.2 IR cases versus 2.9 combined cases in IRSW. Overall, this facilitated an increase in the rate of immediate reconstruction following therapeutic mastectomy from 35 to 49% (p = 0.0004) and decreased wait times from core biopsy to surgery from 70 to 52 days (p < 0.0001).


A multidisciplinary model with optimized scheduling has the potential to improve resource utilization and access to breast cancer care.



The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Surgery at PHC and the staff in the operating room for assistance in implementing the IRSW scheduling. We would also like to acknowledge Shangmei Hou, who helped with chart review and manuscript preparation.


The authors have no financial disclosures.


  1. 1.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1233–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 36:1938–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nicholson RM, Leinster S, Sassoon EM. A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction. Breast. 2007; 16:396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jagsi R, Li Y, Morrow M, Janz N, Alderman A, Graff J, et al. Patient-reported quality of life and satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes after breast conservation and mastectomy with and without reconstruction: results of a survey of breast cancer survivors. Ann Surg. 2015; 261:1198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langstein HN, Cheng MH, Singletary SE, Robb GL, Hoy E, Smith TL, et al. Breast cancer recurrence after immediate reconstruction: patterns and significance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111:712–20 (discussion 721-2).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chevray PM. Timing of breast reconstruction: immediate versus delayed. Cancer J. 2008; 14:223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kronowitz SJ. Immediate versus delayed reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2007 Jan; 34(1):39–50 (abstract vi).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boyd K, Temple C, Ross D. Factors affecting surgical wait times for breast reconstruction. Can J Plast Surg. 2010; 18:107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999; 353:1119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, Beck JR, Ross E, Wong YN, et al. Time to surgery and breast cancer survival in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2:330–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Golshan M, Losk K, Mallory MA, Camuso K, Cutone L, Caterson S, et al. Implementation of a breast/reconstruction surgery coordinator to reduce preoperative delays for patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. J Oncol Pract. 2016; 12:e338–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chao AH, Khansa I, Farrar WB, Miller MJ. Processes of care in breast reconstruction and the long-term impact of a comprehensive breast center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22 Suppl 3:S1256–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bovill E, McKevitt E, Warburton R, Dingee C, Kuusk U, Van Laeken N. “Swing rooms”—an innovative resource utilization model to improve combined care and access to immediate breast reconstruction. British Association of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Annual Meeting; November 29, 2017; London, UK. London: British Association of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons; 2017.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Breast Cancer Surgery in Canada, 2007–2008 to 2009–2010 [Internet]. Toronto, ON: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; 2012 [updated October 19, 2012; cited February 5, 2018]. Available from:
  15. 15.
    Chan T, Hwang H, Karimuddin A. Wait times for general surgery in BC: Moving beyond measurement. BCM J. 2015; 57:341.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Head SJ, Seib R, Osborn JA, Schwarz SK. A “swing room” model based on regional anesthesia reduces turnover time and increases case throughput. Can J Anaesth. 2011; 58:725–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mercereau P, Lee B, Head S, Schwarz S. A regional anesthesia based “swing” room model reduces non-operating time in a mixed orthopedic inpatient outpatient population. Can J Anesth. 2012;59:943–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brennan M, Spillane AJ. Uptake and predictors of post-mastectomy reconstruction in women with breast malignancy–systematic review. EJSO (2013); 39: 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morrow M, Li Y, Alderman A, Jagsi R, Hamilton A, Graft J, Hawley S, et al. Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. JAMA Surg (2014); 149: 1015–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McKevitt E, Dingee C, Warburton R, Pao J, Brown C, Wilson C, et al. Coordination of radiologic and clinical care reduces the wait time to breast cancer diagnosis. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(5):e388–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McKevitt E, Warburton R, Pao J, Kuusk U, Dingee C, Brown C. Breast cancer surgery wait times exceeding targets with current OR allocation methodology, Meeting of the British Columbia Surgical Society, Parksville, BC; 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elaine McKevitt
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Urve Kuusk
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carol Dingee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rebecca Warburton
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jin-Si Pao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nancy Y. Van Laeken
    • 1
    • 2
  • Esta S. Bovill
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryProvidence Breast CenterVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations