Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 188–189 | Cite as

ASO Author Reflections: Quality Improvement in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

  • Jonathan C. SaloEmail author
ASO Author Reflections



The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Litle VR, Buenaventura PO, Luketich JD. Minimally invasive resection for esophageal cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82:711–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017;266:232–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kauppila JH, Xie S, Johar A, et al. Meta-analysis of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanna EM, Norton HJ, Reames MK, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the community hospital setting. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2011;20:521–30, ix.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lorimer PD, Motz BM, Boselli DM, et al. Quality improvement in minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcome improvement through data review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salo JC. Surgery for esophageal cancer: quality of life matters. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:12–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Levine Cancer InstituteCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations