Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 264–272 | Cite as

Clinical Benefit of Preoperative Exercise and Nutritional Therapy for Patients Undergoing Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgeries for Malignancy

  • Hiroki Nakajima
  • Yukihiro YokoyamaEmail author
  • Takayuki Inoue
  • Motoki Nagaya
  • Yota Mizuno
  • Izumi Kadono
  • Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
  • Yoshihiro Nishida
  • Masato Nagino
Hepatobiliary Tumors

Abstract

Background

The impact of prehabilitation on physical fitness and postoperative course after hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeries for malignancy is unknown. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative exercise and nutritional therapies on nutritional status, physical fitness, and postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing an invasive HPB surgery for malignancy.

Methods

Patients who underwent open abdominal surgeries for HPB malignancies (major hepatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, or hepato-pancreatoduodenectomy) between 2016 and 2017 were subjected to prehabilitation. Patients before the introduction of prehabilitation were included as historical control subjects for 1:1 propensity score-matching (no-prehabilitation group). The preoperative nutritional status and postoperative course were compared between the two groups.

Results

The prehabilitation group consisted of 76 patients scheduled to undergo HPB surgeries for malignancy. An identical number of patients were selected as the no-prehabilitation group after propensity score-matching. During the waiting period, serum albumin levels were significantly deteriorated in the no-prehabilitation group, whereas this index did not deteriorate or even improved in the prehabilitation group. By performing prehabilitation, a 6-min walk distance and total muscle/fat ratio were significantly increased during the waiting period. Although the overall incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups, the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the prehabilitation group than in the no-prehabilitation group (median, 23 vs 30 days; p = 0.045).

Conclusion

The introduction of prehabilitation prevented nutritional deterioration, improved physical fitness before surgery, and shortened the postoperative hospital stay for the patients undergoing HPB surgeries for malignancy.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (no. 16K21081 to T. Inoue) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Science and Technology of Japan. We sincerely thank all the patients, collaborating physicians, and other medical staff for their important contributions to this study.

Disclosure

The authors affirm that they have no financial or personal affiliations (including research funding) or other involvement with any commercial organization that has a direct financial interest in any matter included in this manuscript.

Supplementary material

10434_2018_6943_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (123 kb)
FIG. S1 Flow chart of the study participants. (PDF 122 kb)
10434_2018_6943_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (69 kb)
FIG. S2 Correlation between the serum albumin and the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at the second hospitalization. The correlation between the two variables was determined by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. (PDF 69 kb)
10434_2018_6943_MOESM3_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 12 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lafaro K, Buettner S, Maqsood H, et al. Defining post hepatectomy liver insufficiency: where do we stand? J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:2079–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vallance AE, Young AL, Macutkiewicz C, et al. Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review. HPB Oxf. 2015;17:1040–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robinson TN, Wu DS, Pointer L, et al. Simple frailty score predicts postoperative complications across surgical specialties. Am J Surg. 2013;206:544–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Snowden CP, Prentis JM, Anderson HL, et al. Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts complications and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing major elective surgery. Ann Surg. 2010;251:535–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Older P, Smith R, Hall A, French C. Preoperative cardiopulmonary risk assessment by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Crit Care Resusc. 2000;2:198–208.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Snowden CP, Prentis J, Jacques B, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness predicts mortality and hospital length of stay after major elective surgery in older people. Ann Surg. 2013;257:999–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilson RJ, Davies S, Yates D, et al. Impaired functional capacity is associated with all-cause mortality after major elective intraabdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Otsuji H, Yokoyama Y, Ebata T, et al. Preoperative sarcopenia negatively impacts postoperative outcomes following major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection. World J Surg. 2015;39:1494–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayashi K, Yokoyama Y, Nakajima H, et al. Preoperative 6-minute walk distance accurately predicts postoperative complications after operations for hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer. Surgery. 2017;161:525–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Topp R, Ditmyer M, King K, et al. The effect of bed rest and potential of prehabilitation on patients in the intensive care unit. AACN Clin Issues. 2002;13:263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silver JK, Baima J. Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:715–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    West MA, Wischmeyer PE, Grocott MPW. Prehabilitation and nutritional support to improve perioperative outcomes. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2017;7:340–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bordes J, Cardinal M, Kaiser E. Prehabilitation versus Rehabilitation. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gillis C, Loiselle SE, Fiore JF Jr, et al. Prehabilitation with whey protein supplementation on perioperative functional exercise capacity in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer: a pilot double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116:802–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burden ST, Hill J, Shaffer JL, et al. An unblinded randomised controlled trial of preoperative oral supplements in colorectal cancer patients. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011;24:441–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149:713–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011;149:680–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161:584–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laboratories ATSCoPSfCPF. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roy LB, Edwards PA, Barr LH. The value of nutritional assessment in the surgical patient. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1985;9:170–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:377–81.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Amini N, Spolverato G, Gupta R, et al. Impact total psoas volume on short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a new tool to assess sarcopenia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:1593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lai CW, Minto G, Challand CP, et al. Patients’ inability to perform a preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test or demonstrate an anaerobic threshold is associated with inferior outcomes after major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:607–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kaibori M, Ishizaki M, Matsui K, et al. Assessment of preoperative exercise capacity in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with chronic liver injury undergoing hepatectomy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim HK, Suzuki T, Saito K, et al. Effects of exercise and amino acid supplementation on body composition and physical function in community-dwelling elderly Japanese sarcopenic women: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barberan-Garcia A, Ubre M, Roca J, et al. Personalised prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267:50–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pinto BM, Rabin C, Dunsiger S. Home-based exercise among cancer survivors: adherence and its predictors. Psychooncology. 2009;18:369–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroki Nakajima
    • 1
  • Yukihiro Yokoyama
    • 2
    Email author
  • Takayuki Inoue
    • 1
  • Motoki Nagaya
    • 1
  • Yota Mizuno
    • 1
  • Izumi Kadono
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
    • 4
  • Yoshihiro Nishida
    • 1
    • 3
  • Masato Nagino
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RehabilitationNagoya University HospitalNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
  4. 4.Department of AnesthesiologyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations