Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 25, Supplement 3, pp 620–621 | Cite as

ASO Author Reflections: Towards Better Metrics for Judging Academic Productivity in Surgical Oncology

  • Vi Nguyen
  • Jason K. SicklickEmail author
ASO Author Reflections

Notes

Disclosure

Vi Nguyen and Jason K. Sicklick have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Valsangkar NP, Zimmers TA, Kim BJ, et al. Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery: an analysis of 3,850 faculty. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(46):16569–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguyen V, Marmor RA, Ramamoorthy SL, Blair SL, Clary BM, Sicklick JK. Academic surgical oncologists’ productivity correlates with gender, grant funding, and institutional NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center affiliation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1852–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes C. The h-index debate: an introduction for librarians. J Acad Librariansh. 2017;43(6):487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rothstein MG, Davey LM. Gender differences in network relationships in academia. Women Manag Rev. 1995;10:20–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilcox AR, Wong SL. Changing the status quo, including how we measure it. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1801–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Moores Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations