Psychosocial Risks are Independently Associated with Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Medically Comorbid Patients
- 252 Downloads
The specific effect of psychosocial risk factors on surgical outcomes in cancer patients remains unexplored. The purpose of this prospective observational study was to assess the association of preoperative psychosocial risk factors and 30-day complications following cancer surgery.
Psychosocial risks among elective gastrointestinal cancer surgery patients were ascertained through structured interviews using well-established screening forms. We then collected postoperative course by chart review. Multivariable analysis of short-term surgical outcomes was performed in those with a low versus high number of psychosocial risks.
Overall, 142 patients had a median age of 65 years (interquartile range 55–71), 55.9% were male, and 23.1% were non-White. More than half (58.2%) of the study population underwent a resection for a hepato-pancreato-biliary primary tumor, and 31.9% had a colorectal primary tumor. High-risk biomedical comorbidities were present in 43.5% of patients, and three-quarters of patients (73.4%) had at least one psychosocial risk. Complication rates in patients with at least one psychosocial risk were 28.0 absolute percentage points higher than those with no psychosocial risks (54.4% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.039). Multiple psychosocial risk factors in medically comorbid patients independently conferred an increase in the odds of a complication by 3.37-fold (95% CI 1.08–10.48, p = 0.036) compared with those who had one or no psychosocial risks.
We demonstrated a more than threefold odds of a complication in medically comorbid patients with multiple psychosocial risks. These findings support the use of psychosocial risks in preoperative assessment and consideration for inclusion in preoperative optimization efforts.
ILL received salary support from a National Cancer Institute T32 Institutional Training Grant (5T32CA126607) and a Research Foundation of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Resident Research Initiation Grant (GSRRIG-031) for the preparation of this manuscript. FMJ received salary support as the primary investigator of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant (1K08HS024736-01).
Ira L. Leeds, Patrick M. Meyers, Zachary O. Enumah, Jin He, Richard A. Burkhart, Elliott R. Haut, Jonathan E. Efron, and Fabian M. Johnston have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 1.Leeds IL, Canner JK, Efron JE, et al. The independent effect of cancer on outcomes: a potential limitation of surgical risk prediction. J Surg Res. 2017;220:402–409.e6.Google Scholar
- 4.Li C, Carli F, Lee L, et al. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1072–82le.Google Scholar
- 7.Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J, Babic-Illman G, Lockwood L, Martin F. Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): Designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age Ageing. 2007;36(2):190–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Leeds IL, Canner JK, Gani F, et al. Increased Healthcare Utilization for Medical Comorbidities Prior to Surgery Improves Postoperative Outcomes. Ann Surg. Epub 1 Jun 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002851
- 24.American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). User Guide for the 2014 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File. Chicago, IL: ACS-NSQIP; 2015.Google Scholar
- 27.Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Dichotomous or binary responses. In: Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Volume II: Categorical Responses, Counts, and Survival. 3rd edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2012. pp. 501–574.Google Scholar
- 30.Reames BN, Birkmeyer NJO, Dimick JB, Ghaferi A. Socioeconomic Disparities in Mortality After Cancer Surgery: Failure to Rescue. JAMA Surg. 2014;2800(5):1–7.Google Scholar
- 45.Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789–1795.Google Scholar
- 48.Leeds IL, Alimi Y, Hobson DR, et al. Racial and Socioeconomic Differences Manifest in Process Measure Adherence for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(10):1092–1101.Google Scholar
- 49.National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Development of Standards for the Collection of SES in Health Surveys Conducted by HHS. 2014. https://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/120622lt.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.