Locoregional Recurrence Following Breast Cancer Surgery in the Trastuzumab Era: A Systematic Review by Subtype
Increasing evidence suggests that molecular subtype influences locoregional recurrence (LRR) of breast cancer. Previous systematic reviews that evaluated the quantitative influence of subtype on LRR predated the use of Trastuzumab. This study assessed the impact of subtype on LRR in a contemporary treatment era.
A comprehensive search for all published studies assessing LRR according to breast cancer subtype was performed. Only studies with patients treated with Trastuzumab were included. Relevant data were extracted from each study for systematic review. Primary outcome was LRR related to breast cancer subtype.
In total, 11,219 patients were identified from seven studies. Overall LRR rate was 3.44%. The lowest LRR rates were in luminal A (1.7%), and the highest rates were in triple-negative (7.4%) subtypes. There were significantly lower risks of LRR in patients with luminal A subtype compared with luminal B [odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.76; p < 0.0004], HER2/neu-overexpressing (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.24–0.45; p < 0.0001) and triple-negative breast cancers (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.19–0.32; p < 0.0001). There were significant differences in LRR between the luminal B and HER2/neu-overexpressing breast cancers (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41–0.89; p = 0.0145). The reduced risk in HER2/neu overexpressing compared with triple-negative breast cancers approached statistical significance (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55–1.03; p = 0.0933).
Significant variations in LRR occur across breast cancer subtypes, with lowest rates in luminal cancers and highest rates in triple-negative breast cancers. Low levels of LRR highlight advances in breast cancer management in the contemporary era.
- 2.Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ. Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(8):1736–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, et al. Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(25):3366–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 2010;375(9712):377–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Buzdar AU, Ibrahim NK, Francis D, et al. Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(16):3676–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):704–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Abdulkarim BS, Cuartero J, Hanson J, Deschenes J, Lesniak D, Sabri S. Increased risk of locoregional recurrence for women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy compared with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(21):2852–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Nielsen HM, Overgaard M, Grau C, Jensen AR, Overgaard J. Study of failure pattern among high-risk breast cancer patients with or without postmastectomy radiotherapy in addition to adjuvant systemic therapy: long-term results from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82 b and c randomized studies. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(15):2268–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar