Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 2898–2906 | Cite as

The Influence of Breast Density on Preoperative MRI Findings and Outcome in Patients with a Known Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

  • Erin Alexa Elder
  • Alyssa Ferlin
  • Laura A. Vallow
  • Zhuo Li
  • Tammeza C. Gibson
  • Sanjay P. Bagaria
  • Sarah A. McLaughlinEmail author
Breast Oncology



The role of breast density as an indication for preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for surgical planning in women with breast cancer is unknown.


We retrospectively reviewed breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2007 to 2011 who underwent preoperative MRI. We obtained clinical and pathological data and grouped patients by mammographic breast density, with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density A and B considered low density, and C and D considered high density. We analyzed local recurrence rates by breast density.


Among 683 patients, 66.6% had high breast density. We noted MRI abnormalities in the ipsilateral breast in 41.8% high-density and 30.7% low-density breasts, while contralateral abnormalities were noted in 24.9% high-density and 13.8% low-density breasts. Biopsy was recommended for MRI findings in a similar number of patients regardless of density cohort. While more abnormalities were found in high-density breasts, the rate of additional cancer found was not significantly different (ipsilateral: 32 vs. 23%; contralateral: 6.2 vs. 3.2%) for high-and low-density patients, respectively (both p > 0.15). With a median follow-up of 89 months, and similar rates of adjuvant systemic and radiation therapy, no difference in local recurrence rates existed when stratified according to density classification (p > 0.53).


While more abnormalities were identified on MRI in dense breasts, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of cancers identified or in recurrence rates. These findings question the routine use of preoperative breast MRI in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer based solely on breast density.





  1. 1.
    Bae MS, Lee SH, Chu AJ, Shin SU, Ryu HS, Moon WK. Preoperative MR imaging in women with breast cancer detected at screening US. Radiology. 2017;282(3):681-689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Debald M, Abramian A, Nemes L, et al. Who may benefit from preoperative breast MRI? A single-center analysis of 1102 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;153(3):531-537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(4):901-910.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pengel KE, Loo CE, Wesseling J, Pijnappel RM, Rutgers EJ, Gilhuijs KG. Avoiding preoperative breast MRI when conventional imaging is sufficient to stage patients eligible for breast conserving therapy. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(2):273-278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, et al. Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):268-278.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(2):75-89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Girardi V, Carbognin G, Camera L, et al. Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Radiol Med. 2011;116(8):1226-1238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Silbergeld JJ, et al. High cancer yield and positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using preoperative breast MRI for staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(1):W93-99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(13):1295-1303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, et al. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2009;44(7):412-421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(4):1149-1157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seely JM, Lamb L, Malik N, Lau J. The yield of pre-operative breast MRI in patients according to breast tissue density. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(9):3280-3289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siegmann KC, Baur A, Vogel U, Kraemer B, Hahn M, Claussen CD. Risk-benefit analysis of preoperative breast MRI in patients with primary breast cancer. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(4):403-413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Dijckmans L, et al. MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(5):809-816.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P, et al. An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5):392-401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pediconi F, Miglio E, Telesca M, et al. Effect of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on surgical decision making and cancer recurrence rates. Invest Radiol. 2012;47(2):128-135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563-571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bagley FH. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2004;139(4):380-383; discussion 383.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology. 2003;226(3):773-778.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biglia N, Bounous VE, Martincich L, et al. Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(3):199-204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duygulu G, Oktay A, Bilgen IG, Kapkac M, Zekioglu O. The role of breast MRI in planning the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012;18(5):460-467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barco I, Chabrera C, Garcia-Fernandez A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative setting for breast cancer patients with undetected additional disease. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(10):1786-1793.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Del Frate C, Borghese L, Cedolini C, et al. Role of pre-surgical breast MRI in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. Breast. 2007;16(5):469-481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3248-3258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lim HI, Choi JH, Yang J-H, et al. Does pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging in addition to mammography and breast ultrasonography change the operative management of breast carcinoma? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;119(1):163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin Alexa Elder
    • 1
  • Alyssa Ferlin
    • 1
  • Laura A. Vallow
    • 2
  • Zhuo Li
    • 3
  • Tammeza C. Gibson
    • 1
  • Sanjay P. Bagaria
    • 1
  • Sarah A. McLaughlin
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMayo ClinicJacksonvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiation OncologyMayo ClinicJacksonvilleUSA
  3. 3.Biomedical Statistics and InformaticsMayo ClinicJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations