Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 3941–3947 | Cite as

Laparoscopic-Assisted Rectal Surgery for Rectal Cancer Using the Simple Rectum Catcher Device with an Intraoperative Colonoscopy: Results of Our Hospital Study in 203 Patients

  • Akiyo MatsumotoEmail author
  • Kaida Arita
Colorectal Cancer
  • 198 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The gold standard of rectal surgery is TME and DST anastomosis.1 6 The division of mesorectum in tumor-specific mesorectal and total mesorectal excisions is one of the most difficult procedures of anterior dissection. We have developed a laparoscopic-assisted anterior dissection technique using the simple Rectum Catcher device (RC) with an intraoperative colonoscopy (CF).7 , 8

Methods

Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between 99 patients undergoing a laparoscopic approach with the RC and a CF (RCF) and 104 patients undergoing the laparoscopic approach without the RC and without a CF (NRCF). Our standardized procedure for RCF is shown in the video.

Results

BMI (p = .025) and tumor diameter (p = .002) were significantly higher in the RCF group. However, operation times (p = .005) and time to tolerate diet (p = .009) were significantly shorter. Estimated blood loss was significantly decreased (p = .005) and quality of TME or TSME was significantly better (p = .017) in the RCF group. When we further analyzed surgical and oncological outcomes by dividing 3 parts of the rectum, patients with rectosigmoid (Rs) cancer and patients with cancer in the rectum below the peritoneal reflection (Rb) had comparable results. Particularly, statistically significant differences in length of operation time (p = .018), estimated blood loss (p = .050), quality of TME or TSME (p = .017), time to tolerate diet (p = .010), and R0 resections (p = .050) were observed in the patients with cancer below the peritoneal reflection.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic lower rectal surgery using the RC with a CF is feasible and provides acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.

Keywords

Rectal Cancer Anastomotic Leakage Urinary Retention Total Mesorectal Excision Oncological Outcome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 85649 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 167634 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 90629 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:315–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen Z, Myers E, Langer B, Taylor B, Railton RH, Jamieson C. Double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26:231–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feinberg SM, Parker F, Cohen Z. The double stapling technique for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29:885–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffen FD, Knight CD, Whitaker JM, Knight CD Jr. The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Ann Surg. 1990;211:745–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Plasencia G, Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Viamonte M 3rd. Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy and low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;37:829–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsumoto A, Arita K, Tashiro M, Haruki S, Usui S, Hiranuma S. The simple Rectum Catcher device is useful tool for laparoscopic-assisted high and lower rectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1905–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsumoto A, Arita K, Tashiro M, Haruki S, Usui S, Hiranuma S. Laparoscopic-assisted low and ultralow anterior resection for lower rectal cancer using the simple Rectum Catcher device and an intra-operative colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:243–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parfitt JR, Driman DK. The total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a review of its pathological assessment. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:849–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryTsuchiura Kyodo General HospitalTsuchiuraJapan

Personalised recommendations