Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 4023–4028 | Cite as

Comparison of Learning Curves for Retroauricular and Transaxillary Endoscopic Hemithyroidectomy

  • Doh Young Lee
  • Dong Ju Oh
  • Ka Ram Kang
  • Min-Su Kim
  • Kyoung Ho Oh
  • Seung-Kuk Baek
  • Soon-Young Kwon
  • Jeong-Soo Woo
  • Kwang-Yoon JungEmail author
Endocrine Tumors

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate and compare learning curves for the retroauricular (RA) and transaxillary (TA) approaches in endoscopic hemithyroidectomy.

Methods

The medical records of 290 patients who underwent hemithyroidectomy by either the RA or TA approach from November 2007 through December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed (113 patients with RA and 177 with TA). The two groups were compared with regard to patient characteristics, perioperative clinical results, and complications. Learning curves for the two approaches were compared based on the number of cases required to reach a consistent operation time and drainage amount.

Results

Age at diagnosis, tumor size and location, and thyroid size were not significantly different between the two approach groups. Multiplicity and extrathyroid extension were more prevalent in the RA approach (p = 0.048 and 0.020, respectively). Operation time and hospital day were significantly shorter in the RA approach (p < 0.001 and p = 0.030), while postoperative bleeding was less common in the TA approach (p = 0.021). Operation time and drainage amount stabilized after 50 cases for RA and 90 cases for TA. Additionally, operation time, amount of drainage, hospital stay, and complication rates significantly decreased after stabilization of the learning curve. When comparing the two approaches before stabilization, postoperative bleeding was more frequent in the RA approach (p = 0.044), while no difference was observed after stabilization.

Conclusions

The RA approach seems to be beneficial for reducing operation time and hospital stay, and for stabilization of the learning curve. Postoperative bleeding should be considered during the period of early experience for the RA approach.

Keywords

Operation Time Learning Curve Parathyroid Gland Postoperative Bleeding Vocal Cord Paralysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Disclosures

Doh Young Lee, Dong Ju Oh, Ka Ram Kang, Min-Su Kim, Kyoung Ho Oh, Seung-Kuk Baek, Soon-Young Kwon, Jeong-Soo Woo, and Kwang-Yoon Jung have no disclosures to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Singer MC, Seybt MW, Terris DJ. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: I. Preclinical simulation and morphometric assessment. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1631–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW. Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. Clinical feasibility and safety. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1636–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(11):2399–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee DY, Lee KJ, Han WG, et al. Comparison of transaxillary approach, retroauricular approach, and conventional open hemithyroidectomy: a prospective study at single institution. Surgery. 2016;159(2):524–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung WY. Pros of robotic transaxillary thyroid surgery: its impact on cancer control and surgical quality. Thyroid. 2012;22(10):986–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chung EJ, Park MW, Cho JG, et al. A prospective 1-year comparative study of endoscopic thyroidectomy via a retroauricular approach versus conventional open thyroidectomy at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(9):3014–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewis CM, Chung WY, Holsinger FC. Feasibility and surgical approach of transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy without CO(2) insufflation. Head Neck. 2010;32(1):121–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hyun K, Byon W, Park HJ, Park Y, Park C, Yun JS. Comparison of swallowing disorder following gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(6):1914–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tae K, Song CM, Ji YB, Kim KR, Kim JY, Choi YY. Comparison of surgical completeness between robotic total thyroidectomy versus open thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(4):1042–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(2):e1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tae K, Ji YB, Jeong JH, Lee SH, Jeong MA, Park CW. Robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach: our early experiences. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(1):221–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tae K, Ji YB, Jeong JH, Kim KR, Choi WH, Ahn YH. Comparative study of robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach. Head Neck. 2013;35(4):477–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lang BH, Wong CK, Tsang JS, Wong KP. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between robotic-assisted thyroidectomy and non-robotic endoscopic thyroidectomy. J Surg Res. 2014;191(2):389–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kiong KL, Iyer NG, Skanthakumar T, et al. Transaxillary thyroidectomies: a comparative learning experience of robotic vs endoscopic thyroidectomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(5):820–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee DY, Lim S, Kang SH, et al. A prospective 1-year comparative study of transaxillary total thyroidectomy regarding functional outcomes: is it really promising? Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1599–606.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P. Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(10):1371–8; discussion 1378-1379.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu S, Qiu M, Jiang DZ, et al. The learning curve for endoscopic thyroidectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1802–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY. The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(1):226–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Niimi M, Kan S. Comparative study of thyroidectomies. Endoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(12):1741–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanli O, Tefik T, Erdem S, et al. Prospective evaluation of complications in laparoscopic urology at a mid-volume institution using standardized criteria: experience of 1023 cases including learning curve in 9 years. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12(1):33–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dal Moro F, Gardiman MP. Scoring surgical skill in Robotic Prostatectomy as adherence to the surgical plan: proposal for a new tool (ScAPSA). Minerva Urol Nefrol. Epub 9 Sep 2015.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gill J, Booth MI, Stratford J, Dehn TC. The extended learning curve for laparoscopic fundoplication: a cohort analysis of 400 consecutive cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(4):487–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doh Young Lee
    • 1
  • Dong Ju Oh
    • 1
  • Ka Ram Kang
    • 1
  • Min-Su Kim
    • 1
  • Kyoung Ho Oh
    • 1
  • Seung-Kuk Baek
    • 1
  • Soon-Young Kwon
    • 1
  • Jeong-Soo Woo
    • 1
  • Kwang-Yoon Jung
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, College of MedicineKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations