Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 22, Supplement 3, pp 848–854 | Cite as

Development and Validation of a Disease-Specific Instrument to Measure Diet-Targeted Quality of Life for Postoperative Patients with Esophagogastric Cancer

  • Michitaka Honda
  • Takafumi Wakita
  • Yoshihiro Onishi
  • Souya Nunobe
  • Akinori Miura
  • Tatsuto Nishigori
  • Hiroshi Kusanagi
  • Takatsugu Yamamoto
  • Alexander Boddy
  • Shunichi Fukuhara
Gastrointestinal Oncology

Abstract

Background

Patients who have undergone esophagectomy or gastrectomy have certain dietary limitations because of changes to the alimentary tract. This study attempted to develop a psychometric scale, named “Esophago-Gastric surgery and Quality of Dietary life (EGQ-D),” for assessment of impact of upper gastrointestinal surgery on diet-targeted quality of life.

Methods

Using qualitative methods, the study team interviewed both patients and surgeons involved in esophagogastric cancer surgery, and we prepared an item pool and a draft scale. To evaluate the scale’s psychometric reliability and validity, a survey involving a large number of patients was conducted. Items for the final scale were selected by factor analysis and item response theory. Cronbach’s alpha was used for assessment of reliability, and correlations with the short form (SF)-12, esophagus and stomach surgery symptom scale (ES4), and nutritional indicators were analyzed to assess the criterion-related validity.

Results

Through multifaceted discussion and the pilot study, a draft questionnaire comprising 14 items was prepared, and a total of 316 patients were enrolled. On the basis of factor analysis and item response theory, six items were excluded, and the remaining eight items demonstrated strong unidimensionality for the final scale. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.895. There were significant associations with all the subscale scores for SF-12, ES4, and nutritional indicators.

Conclusions

The EGQ-D scale has good contents and psychometric validity and can be used to evaluate disease-specific instrument to measure diet-targeted quality of life for postoperative patients with esophagogastric cancer.

References

  1. 1.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajani JA, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, et al. Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11(5):531–46.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2004;18(6):879–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tyrvainen T, Sand J, Sintonen H, Nordback I. Quality of life in the long-term survivors after total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97(2):121–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kono K, Iizuka H, Sekikawa T, et al. Improved quality of life with jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Am J Surg. 2003;185(2):150–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(10):1384–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karanicolas PJ, Graham D, Gonen M, Strong VE, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Quality of life after gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):1039–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Bottomley A, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-STO 22, to assess quality of life in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(15):2260–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012;36(12):2879–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hiki N, Yamamoto Y, Fukunaga T, et al. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor dissection. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1729–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nunobe S, Sasako M, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Katai H, Sano T. Symptom evaluation of long-term postoperative outcomes after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2007;10(3):167–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Namikawa T, Oki T, Kitagawa H, Okabayashi T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Impact of jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer on quality of life: short- and long-term consequences. Am J Surg. 2012;204(2):203–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TCK, Hop WCJ, Wijnhoven BPL, de Jonge J. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):226–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Millo J, Sgromo B, Marshall RE, Maynard ND. Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):413–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(4):238–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(7):627–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Honda M, Wakita T, Onishi Y, et al. Development and validation of a symptom scale to evaluate postoperative patients with esophagogastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(5):895–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakamura M, Kido Y, Egawa T. Development of a 32-item scale to assess postoperative dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(11):1440–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, Alderson D. A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88(8):1781–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mine S, Sano T, Tsutsumi K, et al. Large-scale investigation into dumping syndrome after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(5):628–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual-framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS: a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1988;33(2):129–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82(2):216–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nakamura M, Kido Y, Yano M, Hosoya Y. Reliability and validity of a new scale to assess postoperative dysfunction after resection of upper gastrointestinal carcinoma. Surg Today. 2005;35(7):535–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Reilly SL, McCann LR. Development and validation of the Diet Quality Tool for use in cardiovascular disease prevention settings. Austral J Prim Health. 2012;18(2):138–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zarrin R, Ibiebele TI, Marks GC. Development and validity assessment of a diet quality index for Australians. Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr. 2013;22(2):177–87.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model: application of an EM algorithm. Appl Psych Measurement. 1992;16(2):159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ware J, Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sigstad H. A clinical diagnostic index in the diagnosis of the dumping syndrome. Changes in plasma volume and blood sugar after a test meal. Acta Med Scand. 1970;188(6):479–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michitaka Honda
    • 1
  • Takafumi Wakita
    • 2
  • Yoshihiro Onishi
    • 3
  • Souya Nunobe
    • 1
  • Akinori Miura
    • 4
  • Tatsuto Nishigori
    • 5
  • Hiroshi Kusanagi
    • 6
  • Takatsugu Yamamoto
    • 7
  • Alexander Boddy
    • 8
  • Shunichi Fukuhara
    • 9
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Gastroenterological CenterJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of SociologyKansai UniversityOsakaJapan
  3. 3.Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research (iHope International)KyotoJapan
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryTokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome HospitalTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryTenri HospitalNaraJapan
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryKameda Medical CenterChibaJapan
  7. 7.Department of Internal MedicineTeikyo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  8. 8.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLeicesterUK
  9. 9.Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public HealthKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  10. 10.Center for Innovative Research for Community and Clinical ExcellenceFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan

Personalised recommendations