Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1095–1101 | Cite as

Effect of Travel Distance and Time to Radiotherapy on Likelihood of Receiving Mastectomy

  • Sharad Goyal
  • Sheenu Chandwani
  • Bruce G. Haffty
  • Kitaw Demissie
Breast Oncology

Abstract

Background

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is the standard of care for women with early-stage breast cancer as an alternative to mastectomy. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between receipt of mastectomy and travel distance and time to RT facility in New Jersey (NJ).

Methods

Data were collected from a cohort of 634 NJ women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. In patients receiving RT, the precise RT facility was used, whereas in patients not receiving RT, surgeons were contacted to determine the location of RT referral. Travel distance and time to RT facility from the patients’ residential address were modeled separately using multiple binomial regression to examine their association with choice of surgery while adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors.

Results

Overall, 58.5 % patients underwent BCS with median travel distance to the radiation facility of 4.8 miles (vs. 6.6 miles for mastectomy) and median travel time of 12.0 min (vs. 15.0 min for mastectomy). Patients residing >9.2 miles compared with ≤9.2 miles from radiation facility were 44 % more likely to receive mastectomy. Additionally, patients requiring >19 min compared with ≤19 min of travel time were 36 % more likely to receive mastectomy.

Conclusions

These data found that travel distance and time from RT facility act as barriers to undergoing BCS in women with early-stage breast cancer. Despite being in an urban region, a significant number of women in NJ with early-stage breast cancer did not receive BCS.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The study team is grateful for medical, surgical and radiation oncologists and primary care physicians who understood the value of research and helped us obtain medical records of patients without which the conduct of the study would have been impossible. This work was supported by grants from the American Cancer Society (RSGT-07-291-01-CPHPS); the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (POP131006); the National Cancer Institute (R01CA133264, R01 CA100598, P01 CA151135, K22 CA138563, P30CA072720, P30 CA016056); US Army Medical Research and Material Command (DAMD-17-01-1-0334); the Breast Cancer Research Foundation; and a gift from the Philip L Hubbell family and the Buckingham Foundation.

Disclosure

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992(11):19–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer. 2003;98(4):697–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(14):1143–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farrow DC, Hunt WC, Samet JM. Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(17):1097–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lazovich DA, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;266(24):3433–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mann BA, Samet JM, Hunt WC, Key CR, Goodwin JM, Goodwin JS. Changing treatment of breast cancer in New Mexico from 1969 through 1985. JAMA. 1988;259(23): 3413–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ballard-Barbash R, Potosky AL, Harlan LC, Nayfield SG, Kessler LG. Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(11):716–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Athas WF, Adams-Cameron M, Hunt WC, Amir-Fazli A, Key CR. Travel distance to radiation therapy and receipt of radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):269–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schroen AT, Brenin DR, Kelly MD, Knaus WA, Slingluff CL Jr. Impact of patient distance to radiation therapy on mastectomy use in early-stage breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):7074–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nattinger AB, Kneusel RT, Hoffmann RG, Gilligan MA. Relationship of distance from a radiotherapy facility and initial breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(17):1344–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Punglia RS, Weeks JC, Neville BA, Earle CC. Effect of distance to radiation treatment facility on use of radiation therapy after mastectomy in elderly women. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(1):56–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Voti L, Richardson LC, Reis IM, Fleming LE, Mackinnon J, Coebergh JW. Treatment of local breast carcinoma in Florida: the role of the distance to radiation therapy facilities. Cancer. 2006;106(1):201–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ambrosone CB, Ciupak GL, Bandera EV, et al. Conducting molecular epidemiological research in the age of HIPAA: a multi-institutional case-control study of breast cancer in African-American and European-American women. J Oncol. 2009;2009:871250.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jagsi R, Abrahamse P, Hawley ST, Graff JJ, Hamilton AS, Katz SJ. Underascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data. Cancer. 2012;118(2):333–41.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharad Goyal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sheenu Chandwani
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Bruce G. Haffty
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kitaw Demissie
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Radiation OncologyRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.Department of EpidemiologyRutgers School of Public HealthPiscatawayUSA
  4. 4.Institute for the Elimination of Health DisparitiesRutgers School of Public HealthPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations