Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 2288–2294 | Cite as

Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation for Right-Sided Colon Cancer

  • Sung Uk Bae
  • Avanish P. Saklani
  • Dae Ro Lim
  • Dong Wook Kim
  • Hyuk Hur
  • Byung Soh Min
  • Seung Hyuk Baik
  • Kang Young Lee
  • Nam Kyu Kim
Colorectal Cancer



A concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation for colonic cancer has been recently introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted CME (LCME) and open CME (OCME) for right-sided colon cancers.


The study group included 128 patients who underwent an LCME and 137 patients who underwent an OCME for right-sided colon cancer between June 2006 and December 2008. The propensity scoring matching for sex, body mass index, tumor location, and pathologic T and TNM stage produced 85 matched pairs.


The median time to soft diet (LCME 6 days vs. OCME 7 days, p < 0.001) and the possible length of stay (7 vs. 13 days, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group. The median operation time (179 vs. 194 minutes, p = 0.862) and number of harvested lymph nodes (27 vs. 28, p = 0.337) were comparable between groups. The morbidity within 30 days after surgery was comparable between the groups (12.9 vs. 24.7 %, p = 0.050). The 5-year overall survival rates of the OCME and LCME groups were 77.8 and 90.3 % (p = 0.028), and the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 71.8 and 83.3 % (p = 0.578), respectively.


Herein, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of LCME for right-sided colon cancer, and in terms of better short-term outcomes, LCME was more advantageous than OCME. Although LCME for right-sided colon cancer was associated with better 5-year overall survival, compared with an open approach, the long-term oncologic outcomes between the groups were comparable.


Overall Survival Propensity Score Open Group Total Mesorectal Excision Laparoscopic Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by the Student’s Association of the Graduate School of Yonsei University funded by the Graduate School of Yonsei University.


The authors have nothing to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Daicho Gan K. Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2012;17:1–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martling A, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, et al. Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm. Br J Surg. 2005;92:225–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J, et al. A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer: implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway—a national audit. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:857–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation: technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354–64; discussion 64–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The Accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250:177–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li JC, Leung KL, Ng SS, Liu SY, Lee JF, Hon SS. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection of right-sided colonic cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:95–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Zervakis N, Kafousi M, Xynos E. Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:1357–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pramateftakis MG. Optimizing colonic cancer surgery: high ligation and complete mesocolic excision during right hemicolectomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2010;14(Suppl. 1):S49–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han DP, Lu AG, Feng H, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopy-assisted radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy: clinical analysis with 177 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;28:623–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun YW, Chi P, Lin HM, et al. [Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;15:24–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakamura T, Onozato W, Mitomi H, et al. Retrospective, matched case-control study comparing the oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Surg Today. 2009;39:1040–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun YW, Chi P, Lin HM, et al. [Risk factors of postoperative chyle leak following complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;15:328–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang T, Ye YJ, Han YM, et al. [Short-term efficacy comparison of complete mesocolic excision and traditional colon cancer resection]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013;16:264–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of Intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2912–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    COLOR Study Group. COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Dig Surg. 2000;17:617–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:655–62; discussion 62–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lehnert T, Abel U, Kienle P, Hinz U. Open versus laparoscopy assisted colectomy. Lancet. 2003;361:74; author reply 5–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ceulemans R, Henri M, Dutson E, Leroy J, Marescaux J. Open versus laparoscopy assisted colectomy. Lancet. 2003;361:73–4; author reply 5–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bilimoria KY, Bentrem D, Nelson H, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg. 2008;143:832–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, De Sanctis A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III colon cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study in Italy. Surg Today. 2012;42:1071–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim KY, Hwang DW, Park YK, Lee HS. A single surgeon’s experience with 54 consecutive cases of multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colorectal cancer: can the laparoscopic approach be performed safely? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:493–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kitano S, Kitajima M, Konishi F, et al. A multicenter study on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1348–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirman I, Cekic V, Poltaratskaia N, et al. Plasma from patients undergoing major open surgery stimulates in vitro tumor growth: lower insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 levels may, in part, account for this change. Surgery. 2002;132:186–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shirabe K, Matsumata T, Shimada M, et al. A comparison of parenteral hyperalimentation and early enteral feeding regarding systemic immunity after major hepatic resection: the results of a randomized prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:205–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sung Uk Bae
    • 1
  • Avanish P. Saklani
    • 1
  • Dae Ro Lim
    • 1
  • Dong Wook Kim
    • 2
  • Hyuk Hur
    • 1
  • Byung Soh Min
    • 1
  • Seung Hyuk Baik
    • 1
  • Kang Young Lee
    • 1
  • Nam Kyu Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Clinic, Severance HospitalYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Biostatistics Collaboration UnitYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations