Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 37–41 | Cite as

Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in BRCA Mutation Carriers

  • Anne Warren Peled
  • Chetan S. Irwin
  • E. Shelley Hwang
  • Cheryl A. Ewing
  • Michael Alvarado
  • Laura J. Esserman
Breast Oncology

Abstract

Background

Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) with preservation of the nipple–areolar complex skin has become increasingly accepted as an oncologically safe procedure. Oncologic outcomes after TSSM in BRCA mutation carriers have not been well-studied.

Methods

We identified 53 BRCA-positive patients who underwent bilateral TSSM for prophylactic (26 patients) or therapeutic indications (27 patients) from 2001 to 2011. Cases were age-matched (for prophylactic cases) or age- and stage-matched (for therapeutic cases) with non-BRCA-positive patients. Outcomes included tumor involvement of resected nipple tissue, the development of new breast cancers in patients who underwent risk-reducing TSSM, and local–regional recurrence in patients who underwent therapeutic TSSM.

Results

Outcomes from 212 TSSM procedures in 53 cases and 53 controls were analyzed. In patients undergoing TSSM for prophylactic indications, in situ cancer was found in one (1.9 %) nipple specimen in BRCA-positive patients versus two specimens (3.8 %) in the non-BRCA-positive cohort (p = 1). At a mean follow-up of 51 months, no new cancers developed in either cohort. In patients undergoing TSSM for therapeutic indications, in situ or invasive cancer was found in zero of the nipple specimens in BRCA-positive patients versus two specimens (3.7 %) in the non-BRCA-positive cohort (p = 0.49). At a mean follow-up of 37 months, there were no local–regional recurrences in the BRCA-positive cohort and 1 (3.7 %) in the non-BRCA-positive cohort.

Conclusions

TSSM is an oncologically safe procedure in BRCA-positive patients. In patients undergoing TSSM as a risk-reducing strategy, 4-year follow-up demonstrates no increased risk of developing new breast cancers; longer-term follow-up is ongoing.

References

  1. 1.
    Peled AW, Foster RD, Stover AC, et al. Outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in 657 breasts. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3402–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stolier AJ, Levine EA. Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J. 2013;19:173–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piper M, Peled AW, Foster RD, Moore DH, Esserman LJ. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:435–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, et al. The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:901e–8e.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Algaithy ZK, Petit JY, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:125–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peled AW, Duralde E, Stover AC, Sbitany H, Esserman LJ, Foster RD. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. In: Plastic Surgery Research Council annual meeting. Santa Monica, May 2013.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118:623–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody III HS, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009;15:440–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1005–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3117–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1341–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reynolds C, Davidson JA, Lindor NM, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: can the nipple be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3102–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:967–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1633–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4948–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Warren Peled
    • 1
  • Chetan S. Irwin
    • 1
  • E. Shelley Hwang
    • 2
  • Cheryl A. Ewing
    • 3
  • Michael Alvarado
    • 3
  • Laura J. Esserman
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Division of Breast Surgery, Department of SurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Division of Breast Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations