Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 20, Issue 9, pp 3083–3088 | Cite as

Thyroid Nodules with Bethesda System III Cytology: Can Ultrasonography Guide the Next Step?

  • Hye Mi Gweon
  • Eun Ju Son
  • Ji Hyun Youk
  • Jeong-Ah Kim
Head and Neck Oncology

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and the role of thyroid ultrasound (US) in predicting malignancy for Bethesda system III nodules and to suggest management guidelines for these nodules.

Methods

A total of 155 thyroid nodules with Bethesda system III cytology in 155 patients with surgery or follow-up repeat FNA were included in this study. On the basis of US features, final assessment for thyroid nodules were prospectively classified into one of three categories: (1) probably benign, (2) low suspicious for malignancy, and (3) suspicious for malignancy. The clinicopathologic characteristics of patients and US features of nodules were compared according to malignancy and benignity.

Results

Of the 155 Bethesda system III nodules, 69 (44.5 %) underwent surgery without repeat FNA and 86 (55.5 %) nodules underwent repeat FNA, and a malignancy rate of 55.5 % (86/155) was determined. Thyroid nodules with concurrent thyroid cancer were more likely to be malignant (P < 0.001). The malignancy rate of sonographically suspicious for malignancy was 100 %, higher than the 58 % of sonographically low suspicious for malignancy, and 7.7 % of sonographically probably benign nodules (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

US assessment may help the clinician decide between surgery and repeat FNA for managing Bethesda system III nodules. When the US assessment for the thyroid nodules is suspicious for malignancy, repeat FNA may be unnecessary and surgery should be considered.

Keywords

Thyroid Nodule Follicular Neoplasm Malignancy Rate Bethesda System Indeterminate Cytology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2012 (6-2012-0198).

References

  1. 1.
    Wang CC, Friedman L, Kennedy GC, Wang H, Kebebew E. A large multicenter correlation study of thyroid nodule cytopathology and histopathology. Thyroid. 2011;21:243–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2009;19:1159–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pang T, Ihre-Lundgren C, Gill A, McMullen T, Sywak M, Sidhu S, Delbridge L. Correlation between indeterminate aspiration cytology and final histopathology of thyroid neoplasms. Surgery. 2010;148:532–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sahin M, Gursoy A, Tutuncu NB, Guvener DN. Prevalence and prediction of malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;65:514–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoon JH, Kwak JY, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kim JY, Koo HR, Kim MH. How to approach thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2147–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller B, Burkey S, Lindberg G, Snyder WH 3rd, Nwariaku FE. Prevalence of malignancy within cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Am J Surg. 2004;188:459–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendez W, Rodgers SE, Lew JI, Montano R, Solorzano CC. Role of surgeon-performed ultrasound in predicting malignancy in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2487–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY, Oh KK, Kim DI, Lee JT, Yoo HS. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:687–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jo VY, Stelow EB, Dustin SM, Hanley KZ. Malignancy risk for fine-needle aspiration of thyroid lesions according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:450–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Renshaw AA. Should “atypical follicular cells” in thyroid fine-needle aspirates be subclassified? Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:186–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nayar R, Ivanovic M. The indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration: experience from an academic center using terminology similar to that proposed in the 2007 National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Cancer. 2009;117:195–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Theoharis CG, Schofield KM, Hammers L, Udelsman R, Chhieng DC. The Bethesda thyroid fine-needle aspiration classification system: year 1 at an academic institution. Thyroid. 2009;19:1215–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu HH, Rose C, Elsheikh TM. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: an experience of 1,382 cases in a community practice setting with the implication for risk of neoplasm and risk of malignancy. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40:399–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim DW, Lee EJ, Jung SJ, Ryu JH, Kim YM. Role of sonographic diagnosis in managing Bethesda class III nodules. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:2136–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    VanderLaan PA, Marqusee E, Krane JF. Clinical outcome for atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: should repeated FNA be the preferred initial approach? Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:770–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hye Mi Gweon
    • 1
  • Eun Ju Son
    • 1
  • Ji Hyun Youk
    • 1
  • Jeong-Ah Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations