Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 2016–2022 | Cite as

A Prospective Validation Study to Diagnose Serosal Invasion and Nodal Metastases of Gastric Cancer by Multidetector-row CT

  • Shinichi Hasegawa
  • Takaki Yoshikawa
  • Junya Shirai
  • Hirohito Fujikawa
  • Haruhiko Cho
  • Tsunehiro Doiuchi
  • Tetsuo Yoshida
  • Tsutomu Sato
  • Takashi Oshima
  • Norio Yukawa
  • Yasushi Rino
  • Munetaka Masuda
  • Akira Tsuburaya
Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Background

Multidetector-row CT (MDCT) may provide accurate preoperative staging of resectable gastric cancer. However, the standard methods and criteria to diagnose the T and N stages to select the patients who are good candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy have not been established yet.

Methods

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of MDCT to diagnose the serosal invasion and nodal metastases of gastric cancer. Patients who had gastric adenocarcinoma underwent MDCT scanning using a standardized method. The T and N stage were diagnosed by prespecified criteria. The analyses were performed in the patients who had cN0–2 and M0 tumors and underwent curative gastrectomy as a primary treatment. The accuracy was calculated by comparing the results of MDCT with the histopathological findings.

Results

A total of 315 patients were analyzed. The overall diagnostic accuracy (95 % confidence interval) of T staging was 71.4 % (225 of 315, 66.2–76.1). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for serosal invasion were 85.7 % (81.4–89.1), 54.5 % (42.6–66.0), and 94.0 % (90.3–96.3), respectively. The false-positive rate for serosal invasion was 6.0 % (2.9–7.7). The overall diagnostic accuracy of N staging was 75.9 % (239 of 315, 70.9–80.3). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for nodal metastases were 81.3 % (76.6–85.2), 46.4 % (36.8–56.3), and 96.8 % (93.5–98.4), respectively. The false-positive rate for nodal metastases was 3.2 % (1.6–6.5 %).

Conclusions

These results suggest that MDCT provides an accurate diagnosis with high specificity and a low false-positive rate and can be used to select the patients who are candidates for preoperative chemotherapy.

Keywords

Gastric Cancer Nodal Metastasis Early Gastric Cancer Preoperative Chemotherapy Serosal Invasion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Parkin DM. International variation. Oncogene. 2004;23:6329–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nomura K. Cancer statistics in Japan, 2005. Tokyo: Foundation for Promotion Cancer Research; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2107–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:6–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nashimoto A, Nakajima T, Furukawa H, et al. Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin, fluorouracil, and cytosine arabinoside followed by oral fluorouracil in serosa-negative gastric cancer. Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206-1. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2282–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology. 2004;230:465–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, et al. Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology. 2005;236:879–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hur J, Park MS, Lee JH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography in T- and N staging of gastric cancer with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:372–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC, et al. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT—correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology. 2007;242:472–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shinichi Hasegawa
    • 1
    • 3
  • Takaki Yoshikawa
    • 1
    • 3
  • Junya Shirai
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hirohito Fujikawa
    • 1
    • 3
  • Haruhiko Cho
    • 1
  • Tsunehiro Doiuchi
    • 2
  • Tetsuo Yoshida
    • 2
  • Tsutomu Sato
    • 3
  • Takashi Oshima
    • 3
  • Norio Yukawa
    • 3
  • Yasushi Rino
    • 3
  • Munetaka Masuda
    • 3
  • Akira Tsuburaya
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryYokohama City UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations