Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 981–989 | Cite as

Presurgical Localization of Parathyroid Adenomas with Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 T: An Adjunct Method to Supplement Traditional Imaging

  • Allison M. Grayev
  • Lindell R. Gentry
  • Michael J. Hartman
  • Herbert Chen
  • Scott B. Perlman
  • Scott B. Reeder
Endocrine Tumors

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the use of a chemical shift-based water–fat separation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method, and time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRI at 3 T for improved presurgical localization of parathyroid adenomas.

Methods

Twenty-five patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent MRI, which was reviewed by two experienced neuroradiologists who were blinded to Tc-99m sestamibi imaging and operative results.

Results

Overall, MRI detected 16 adenomas in 25 patients (sensitivity 64%, positive predictive value 67%), while sestamibi detected 18 of 25 adenomas (sensitivity 72%, positive predictive value 90%). Importantly, MRI was able to detect adenomas in four (57%) of the seven patients whose disease was missed by sestamibi analysis. MRI demonstrated excellent image quality and fat suppression by using a chemical shift-based water–fat separation technique. The time-resolved MRI was considered to be less helpful, although in some cases it was indispensable.

Conclusions

MRI is an excellent adjunct for preoperative parathyroid localization. The advent of improved fat suppression techniques in the neck, including chemical shift–based water–fat separation, is critical to its utility. Although time-resolved MRI was not always helpful, it was crucial in certain cases. It may prove to be more useful with the development of faster scanning techniques.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen H, Mack E, Starling JR. Radioguided parathyroidectomy is equally effective for both adenomatous and hyperplastic glands. Ann Surg. 2003;238:332–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Judson BL, Shaha AR. Nuclear imaging and minimally invasive surgery in the management of hyperparathyroidism. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1813–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lal A, Bianco J, Chen H. Radioguided parathyroidectomy in patients with familial hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:739–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huppert BJ, Reading CC. Parathyroid sonography: imaging and intervention. J Clin Ultrasound. 2006;35:144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilmour JR. The gross anatomy of the parathyroid glands. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1938;46:133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen H, Mack E, Starling JR. A comprehensive evaluation of peri-operative adjuncts during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: which is most reliable? Ann Surg. 2005;242:375–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen H, Sokoll L, Udelsman R. Outpatient minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: a combination of sestamibi-SPECT localization, cervical block anesthesia, and intraoperative PTH assay. Surgery. 1999;126:14–8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howe JR. Minimally invasive parathyroid surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:1399–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nichols KJ, Tomas MB, Tronco GG, et al. Preoperative parathyroid scintigraphic lesion localization: accuracy of various types of readings. Radiology. 2008;248:221–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sofferman RA, Nathan MH, Fairbank JT, Foster RS Jr, Krag DN. Preoperative technetium Tc 99m sestamibi imaging: paving the way to minimal-access parathyroid surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:369–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abboud B, Sleliaty G, Rabaa L, et al. Ultrasonography: highly accuracy technique for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenoma. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:1574–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adler JT, Chen H, Schaefer S, Sippel RS. Does routine use of ultrasound result in additional thyroid procedures in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism? J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:536–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meilstrup JW. Ultrasound examination of the parathyroid glands. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004;37:763–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis ML, Quayle FJ, Middleton WD, et al. Ultrasound facilitates minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in patients lacking definitive localization from preoperative sestamibi scan. Am J Surg. 2007;194:785–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rickes S, Sitzy J, Neye H, et al. High-resolution ultrasound in combination with colour-Doppler sonography for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Ultraschall Med. 2003;24:85–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reeder SB, Desser TS, Weigel RJ, et al. Sonography in hyperparathyroidism: review with emphasis on scanning technique. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:539–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grosso I, Sargiotto A, D’Amelio P, et al. Preoperative localization of parathyroid adenoma with sonography and 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy in primary hyperthyroidism. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35:186–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Dalen A, Smit CP, van Vroonhoven TJMV, Burger H, de Lange EE. Minimally invasive surgery for solitary parathyroid adenomas in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: role of US with supplemental CT. Radiology. 2001;220:631–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gritzmann N, Koischwitz D, Rettenbacher T. Sonography of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:1131–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zald PB, Hamilton BE, Larsen ML, Cohen JI. The role of computed tomography for localization of parathyroid adenomas. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:1405–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shah S, Win Z, Al-Nahhas A. Multimodality imaging of the parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism. Minerva Endocrinol. 2008;33:193–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mortenson MM, Evans DB, Lee JE, et al. Parathyroid exploration in the reoperative neck: improved preoperative localization with 4D-computed tomography. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:888–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gotway MB, Reddy GP, Webb WR, Morita ET, Clark OH, Higgins CB. Comparison between MR imaging and 99mTc MIBI scintigraphy in the evaluation of recurrent or persistent hyperparathyroidism. Radiology. 2001;218:783–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee VS, Spritzer CE, Coleman RE, Wilkinson RH, Coogan AC, Leight GS. The complementary roles of fast spin-echo MR imaging and double phase 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy for localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1555–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fayet P, Hoeffel C, Fulla Y, et al. Technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging and venous blood sampling in persistent and recurrent hyperparathyroidism. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:459–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Numerow LW, Morita ET, Clark OH, Higgins CB. Hyperparathyroidism: a comparison of sestamibi scintigraphy, MRI, and ultrasonography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995;5:702–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reeder SB, Pineda AR, Wen Z, et al. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:636–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reeder S, McKenzie CA, Pineda AR, et al. Water–fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:644–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barger AV, DeLone DR, Bernstein MA, Welker KM. Fat signal suppression in head and neck imaging using fast spin-echo IDEAL technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1292–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:345–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Turski PA, Korosec FR, Carroll TJ, Willig DS, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid bifurcation using time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) technique. Top Magn Res Imaging. 2001;12:175–81.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lim RP, Shapiro M, Wang EY, et al. 3D Time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced bolus-chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1847–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ferre JC, Brunet JF, Carsin-Nicol B, Larralde A, Godey B, Gauvrit JY. Optimized time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T: appreciating the feasibility of assessing cervical paragangliomas. J Neuroradiol. 2009;37:104–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Department of Health and Human Services; Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology report to the office of the National Coordinator For Health Information Technology: defining key health information terms. 2008. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_10741_848133_0_0_18/10_2_hit_terms.pdf.
  35. 35.
    Beatty PJ, Brau ACS, Chang S, et al. A method for autocalibrating 2D-accelerated volumetric parallel imaging with clinically practical reconstruction times (abstract 1749). In: Proceedings of the 15th annual meeting of ISMRM, Berlin, Germany, 2007.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brau AC, Beatty PJ, Skare S, Bammer R. Comparison of reconstruction accuracy and efficiency among autocalibrating datadriven parallel imaging methods. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:382–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lum DP, Busse RD, Francois CJ, et al. Increased volume of coverage for abdominal contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two-dimensional autocalibrating parallel imaging: initial experience at 3.0 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1093–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pineda AR, Reeder SB, Wen Z, Pelc NJ. Cramer-Rao bounds for three-point decomposition of water and fat. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:625–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bergenfelz AOJ, Jansson SKG, Wallin GK, et al. Impact of modern techniques on short-term outcome after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: a multicenter study comprising 2,708 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:851–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mistretta CA, Wieben O, Velikina J, et al. Highly constrained backprojection for time-resolved MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:30–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Johnson, KM, Velikina J, Wu Y, Kecskemeti S, Wieben O, Mistretta CA. Improved waveform fidelity using local HYPR reconstruction (HYPR LR). Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:456–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wu Y, Wu Y, Korosec FR, Wieben O, Du J, Mistretta CA. HYPR PR-TRICKS: highly undersampled hybrid radial/Cartesian acquisition with HighlY constrained back Projection reconstruction for time resolved MRI. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med. 2006;14:335.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Haider CR, Hu HH, Campeau NG, Huston J III, Riederer SJ. 3D high temporal and spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the whole brain. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:749–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allison M. Grayev
    • 1
  • Lindell R. Gentry
    • 1
  • Michael J. Hartman
    • 1
  • Herbert Chen
    • 2
  • Scott B. Perlman
    • 1
  • Scott B. Reeder
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Medical PhysicsUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  5. 5.Department of MedicineUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations