A Meta-analysis of Preoperative Localization Techniques for Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism
- 1.1k Downloads
Reported accuracy of preoperative localization imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) varies. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of ultrasound, sestamibi-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) as preoperative localization strategies.
A meta-analysis was performed of studies investigating the accuracy of ultrasound, sestamibi-SPECT, and 4D-CT for preoperative localization in pHPT. Electronic databases were systematically searched, and two independent reviewers reviewed results using specific criteria. Study quality was assessed using a validated measure for diagnostic imaging studies. Study heterogeneity and pooled results were calculated.
43 studies met criteria for inclusion, and data were available for extraction in 19 ultrasound, 9 sestamibi-SPECT, and 4 4D-CT studies. Ultrasound had pooled sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of 76.1% (95% CI 70.4–81.4%) and 93.2% (90.7–95.3%), respectively. Sestamibi-SPECT had pooled sensitivity and PPV of 78.9% (64–90.6%) and 90.7% (83.5–96.0%), respectively. Only two 4D-CT studies investigated patients undergoing initial parathyroidectomy. Results suggested sensitivity and PPV of 89.4% and 93.5%, respectively.
Ultrasound and sestamibi-SPECT are similar in ability to preoperatively localize abnormal parathyroid glands in pHPT. Accuracy may be improved with 4D-CT; however, further investigation is required. Choice of preoperative imaging strategy depends on numerous patient, institutional, and economic factors of which the surgeon must be aware.
- 3.Udelsman R, Lin Z, Donovan P. The superiority of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy based on 1,650 consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg. 2010 (in press).Google Scholar
- 5.Bergenfelz AOJ, Jansson SKG, Wallin GK, Mårtensson HG, Rasmussen L, Eriksson HLO, et al. Impact of modern techniques on short-term outcome after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: a multicenter study comprising 2,708 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394(5):851–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Starker LF, Mahajan A, Björklund P, Sze G, Udelsman R, Carling T. 4D Parathyroid CT as the initial localization study for patients with De Novo primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg. Oncol 2010;1–6.Google Scholar
- 10.Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3(25).Google Scholar
- 11.Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PNM, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(9).Google Scholar
- 12.Reitsma J, Rutjes A, Whiting P, Vlassov V, Leeflang M, Deeks J. Assessing methodological quality. Cochrane Syst Rev Diagnostic Test Accuracy. 2009;1–28.Google Scholar
- 22.Erbil Y, x015F, im, et al. Impact of gland morphology and concomitant thyroid nodules on preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(4):580–5.Google Scholar
- 23.Lumachi F, Zucchetta P, Marzola MC, et al. Advantages of combined technetium-99m-sestamibi scintigraphy and high-resolution ultrasonography in parathyroid localization: comparative study in 91 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;143(6):755–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar