Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 17, Supplement 3, pp 211–218 | Cite as

Impact of Breast Density on the Presenting Features of Malignancy

  • Nimmi Arora
  • Tari A. King
  • Lindsay M. Jacks
  • Michelle M. Stempel
  • Sujata Patil
  • Elizabeth Morris
  • Monica Morrow
American Society of Breast Surgeons

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the relationship between breast density, presenting features and molecular subtype of cancer, and surgical treatment received.

Methods

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Eligible patients had stage 1–3 cancer, were treated between 1/2005 and 6/2007, and had estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) measurements and films available for review. Density was classified at presentation as 1–4 using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification.

Results

1,323 patients were included. Significant differences across the four density groups were present in age, race, multicentricity/focality, and presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC). When density was combined into two groups, after adjustment for age, only an EIC and mammographically occult cancer were significantly more common in the dense groups. Extremely dense breasts (BI-RADS density 4) more commonly had luminal A tumors (p = 0.05), lobular cancers (p = 0.03), multicentricity (p = 0.02), and occult tumors (p < 0.0001). Greater density was associated with increased mastectomy use, with 61% of the extremely dense group having mastectomy versus 43% of those of lesser density (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Cancers in extremely dense breasts occur in younger women, are more often mammographically occult, and appear to be phenotypically different from those arising in other density groups. The more common use of mastectomy may be related to these features, although density itself is not a selection criterion for mastectomy.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(9):670–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1159–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vacek PM, Geller BM. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(5):715–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, et al. Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84(10):781–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, et al. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme. J Med Screen. 1998;5(4):207–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(12):886–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelemen LE, Sellers TA, Vachon CM. Can genes for mammographic density inform cancer aetiology? Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(10):812–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Odefrey F, Stone J, Gurrin LC, et al. Common genetic variants associated with breast cancer and mammographic density measures that predict disease. Cancer Res. 2010;70(4):1449–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yong M, Schwartz SM, Atkinson C, et al. Associations between polymorphisms in glucuronidation and sulfation enzymes and mammographic breast density in premenopausal women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(2):537–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aiello EJ, Buist DS, White E, Porter PL. Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(3):662–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray LA, Helvie MA. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Radiology. 2004;230(1):42–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406(6797):747–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-mammography. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology (ACR); 2003.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palomares MR, Machia JR, Lehman CD, et al. Mammographic density correlation with Gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(7):1324–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feig SA, Shaber GS, Patchefsky A, et al. Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977;128(3):403–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(13):1081–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, et al. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(3):676–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCormack VA, Perry N, Vinnicombe SJ, Silva Idos S. Ethnic variations in mammographic density: a British multiethnic longitudinal study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(4):412–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morrow M, Chatterton RT Jr, Rademaker AW, et al. A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;121(3):565–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pankow JS, Vachon CM, Kuni CC, et al. Genetic analysis of mammographic breast density in adult women: evidence of a gene effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(8):549–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Carlson EE, et al. Strong evidence of a genetic determinant for mammographic density, a major risk factor for breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67(17):8412–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wiechmann L, Sampson M, Stempel M, et al. Presenting features of breast cancer differ by molecular subtype. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2705–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weigelt B, Horlings HM, Kreike B, et al. Refinement of breast cancer classification by molecular characterization of histological special types. J Pathol. 2008;216(2):141–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, et al. Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60(3):398–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ma H, Luo J, Press MF, et al. Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? Luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(2):479–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seo BK, Pisano ED, Kuzimak CM, et al. Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol. 2006;13(10):1211–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Becker S, Kaaks R. Exogenous and endogenous hormones, mammographic density and breast cancer risk: can mammographic density be considered an intermediate marker of risk? Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009;181:135–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morishita M, Ohtsuru A, Hayashi T, et al. Clinical significance of categorisation of mammographic density for breast cancer prognosis. Int J Oncol. 2005;26(5):1307–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Sellers TA, et al. Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(4):872–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Practice guideline for the breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(2):362–376.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morrow M, Schmidt RA, Bucci C. Breast conservation for mammographically occult carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1998;227(4):502–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sabel MS, Rogers K, Griffith K, et al. Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(2):99–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moore MM, Borossa G, Imbrie JZ, et al. Association of infiltrating lobular carcinoma with positive surgical margins after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg. 2000;231(6):877–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Silberfein EJ, Hunt KK, Broglio K, et al. Clinicopathologic factors associated with involved margins after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma. Clin Breast Cancer. 2010;10(1):52–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Park CC, Rembert J, Chew K, et al. High mammographic breast density is independent predictor of local but not distant recurrence after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(1):75–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cil T, Fishell E, Hanna W, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 2009;115(24):5780–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Millar EK, Graham PH, O’Toole SA, et al. Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4701–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nguyen PL, Taghian AG, Katz MS, et al. Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(14):2373–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006;295(21):2492–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nimmi Arora
    • 1
  • Tari A. King
    • 1
  • Lindsay M. Jacks
    • 2
  • Michelle M. Stempel
    • 1
  • Sujata Patil
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Morris
    • 3
  • Monica Morrow
    • 1
  1. 1.Breast Service, Department of SurgeryMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Evelyn H. Lauder Breast CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations