Urban/Rural Residence Moderates Effect of Race on Receipt of Surgery in Patients with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Report from the South Carolina Central Cancer Registry
- 108 Downloads
Surgical resection is the cornerstone of therapy in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Previous studies have reported underuse of adjuvant therapy among African Americans (AA). This study explores the independent effect of race on surgical resection in a recent, population-based sample of breast cancer patients.
All cases of nonmetastatic breast cancer reported to the our state Cancer Registry between 1996 and 2002 were identified and linked to the state Inpatient/Outpatient Surgery Files and the 2000 Census. Characteristics between Caucasian and AA patients were compared using Student’s t and chi-square tests. Odds ratios (OR) of resection and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using logistic regression.
We identified 12,404 Caucasian and 3,411 AA women. AA patients were more likely to be younger, non-married, have greater comorbidity, reside in rural communities, be less educated, live in poverty, and be uninsured or covered by Medicaid (all P < 0.0001). AA patients were slightly less likely to undergo resection compared to Caucasian patients (94.9% versus 96.4%, P < 0.0001). An interaction effect between race and urban/rural patient residence was observed (P = 0.003). After controlling for other factors, the adjusted OR for resection for urban AA patients was 0.58 (95% CI 0.41–0.82). In contrast, race had no effect on resection among rural patients (OR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.70–1.47).
AA race is an independent predictor of underuse of surgery among urban patients with breast cancer, while rural residence is associated with underuse of surgery, irrespective of race. Interventions designed to optimize surgical cancer care should target these vulnerable populations.
KeywordsBreast cancer Race Residence Socioeconomic status Resection
- 7.Roach M, 3rd, Cirrincione C, Budman D, et al. Race and survival from breast cancer: based on Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 8541. Cancer J Sci Am 1997; 3:107–12Google Scholar
- 8.Dignam JJ, Redmond CK, Fisher B, et al. Prognosis among African-American women and white women with lymph node negative breast carcinoma: findings from two randomized clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). Cancer 1997; 80:80–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dignam JJ. Efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in African-American and Caucasian women. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001:36–43Google Scholar
- 19.Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000Google Scholar
- 20.SEER Summary Staging Manual 2000. Available: http://www.seer.cancer.gov/tools/ssm/
- 21.Johnson C. Registry operations and data standards. Vol. 2. Chicago: American College of Surgeons, 1996Google Scholar
- 22.Johnson C. (1998) Registry operations and data standards, Revised (Appendix D, Surgery Codes). Vol. 2. Chicago: American College of SurgeonsGoogle Scholar
- 24.United States Department of Health and Human Services: Poverty Guidelines, Research, and Measurement. Available: http://www.aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/index.shtml (accessed 6/24/2006)
- 31.Rural Policy Research Institute. Welfare Reform in Rural America: A Review of Current Research, 2001Google Scholar
- 32.Fletcher C FJ, Gaddis B, Winter M, et al. Small towns and welfare reform: Iowa case studies of families and communities. Rural dimensions of welfare reform: A research conference on poverty, welfare, and food assistance. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, 2000Google Scholar
- 33.Schur C FS. Access to health care. Rural health in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar
- 34.National Advisory Committee on Rural Health. Medicare Reform: A Rural Perspective, 2001Google Scholar
- 35.HHS Rural Task Force Report to the Secretary. One Department Serving Rural America, 2002Google Scholar
- 37.Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, et al. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:471–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar