Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 15, Issue 12, pp 3335–3341 | Cite as

Predicting Life Expectancy and Symptom Relief Following Surgery for Advanced Malignancy

  • David D. SmithEmail author
  • Laurence E. McCahill
Healthcare Policy and Outcomes



We prospectively evaluated surgeons’ ability to predict outcomes of life expectancy and symptom relief following major surgery for patients with advanced malignancies.


Fifty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were evaluated regarding major symptoms requiring a surgical intervention and followed until death or last contact. The patients’ surgeons answered questions preoperatively and postoperatively, relating to issues such as estimated survival time and likelihood of symptom relief following surgery. We compared these estimates with patients’ clinical outcomes and responses to a symptom questionnaire completed just prior to surgery, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months following surgery.


Surgeons’ preoperative estimates of patient survival agreed with survival outcomes. Preoperatively, surgeons accurately identified cases where a patient was expected to live less than 1 year without surgery (P < 0.0001) and with surgery (P = 0.0342). Surgeons’ preoperative estimates of the success of symptom improvement following surgery did not correlate in general with patients’ self-assessments (P = 0.6454). Specifically, surgeons underestimated their success in symptom resolution. However, there were statistically significant differences between patients who were judged by surgeons postoperatively to have mild or no palliation compared with those with excellent (P = 0.0372) and good (P = 0.0203) palliation.


Preoperatively, surgeons accurately estimated patients’ survival time with surgery. Surgeons’ postoperative estimates of success of symptom relief agreed with patients’ self-assessments. Preoperatively, surgeons tended to underestimate their patients’ symptom relief. Surgeons may wish to consider other criteria than their predictions for symptom relief in deciding whether a patient is a candidate for palliative surgery.


Symptom Relief Advanced Malignancy Symptom Palliation Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Patient Survival Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors are grateful to the American Cancer Society for supporting this study through a research grant.


  1. 1.
    Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I et al. Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 2005;92:101–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hartley MN, Sagar PM. The surgeon’s ‘gut feeling’ as a predictor of post-operative outcome. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994;76:277–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCahill LE, Smith DD, Borneman T et al. A prospective evaluation of palliative outcomes for surgery of advanced malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:654–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB et al. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:1326–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krouse RS, Nelson RA, Farrell BR et al. Surgical palliation at a cancer center: incidence and outcomes. Arch Surg 2001;136:773–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCahill LE, Krouse R, Chu D et al. Indications and use of palliative surgery-results of Society of Surgical Oncology survey. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:104–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCahill LE, Krouse RS, Chu DZ et al. Decision making in palliative surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:411–22; discussion 422–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miner TJ, Jaques DP, Shriver CD. A prospective evaluation of patients undergoing surgery for the palliation of an advanced malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:696–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosen SA, Buell JF, Yoshida A, et al. Initial presentation with stage IV colorectal cancer: how aggressive should we be? Arch Surg 2000;135:530–4; discussion 534–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joffe J, Gordon PH. Palliative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:355–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Makela J, Haukipuro K, Laitinen S et al. Palliative operations for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:846–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Popiela T, Kedra B, Sierzega M et al. [Surgical palliation for pancreatic cancer. The 25-year experience of a single reference centre]. Zentralbl Chir 2002;127:965–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bonenkamp JJ, Sasako M, Hermans J et al. Tumor load and surgical palliation in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48:1219–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miner TJ. Palliative surgery for advanced cancer: lessons learned in patient selection and outcome assessment. Am J Clin Oncol 2005;28:411–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Podnos YD, Juarez G, Pameijer C et al. Impact of surgical palliation on quality of life in patients with advanced malignancy: results of the decisions and outcomes in palliative surgery (DOPS) trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:922–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagman LD. Palliative surgical oncology. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2004;13:XIII-XIVGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wagman LD. Progress in palliative surgery—is it a subspecialty? J Surg Oncol 2007;96:449–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiostatisticsCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical OncologyUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations