Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 14, Issue 10, pp 2861–2866 | Cite as

Isolated Tumor Cells in the Sentinel Node Affect Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Melanoma

  • Randall P. Scheri
  • Richard Essner
  • Roderick R. Turner
  • Xing Ye
  • Donald L. Morton



The clinical significance of isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in the melanoma-draining sentinel nodes (SNs) is unclear.


Records of patients who underwent SN biopsy (SNB) for stage I/II melanoma at our institute between 1991 and 2003 were reviewed to identify patients whose SNs were tumor-free or contained only ITC (≤0.2 mm). Tumor-positive SNs were reevaluated by the study pathologist to confirm the diagnosis and microstage the SN. Characteristics of the primary melanoma, tumor status of regional lymph nodes, and other prognostic variables were recorded. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) rates were compared by the log-rank test.


Of 1382 patients who underwent SNB, 1168 (85%) had tumor-free SNs; among the 214 remaining patients with tumor-positive SNs, 57 had metastases limited to ITC. Completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) was performed in 52 of 57 patients: six (12%) had metastases in nonsentinel nodes (NSNs). At a median follow-up of 57 months, 5-year and 10-year MSS was significantly higher (P = .02) for the 1168 patients with tumor-negative SNs (94 ± 1% and 87 ± 2%, respectively) than the 57 patients with ITC-positive SNs (89 ± 4% and 80 ± 7%, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified ITC (P = .002), Breslow’s thickness (P < .0001), ulceration (P < .0001), and primary site (P = .04) as significant for MSS.


Patients with ITC in SNs have a significantly higher risk of melanoma-specific death than those with tumor-negative SNs. The 12% incidence of nonsentinel node metastasis is similar to rates reported for patients with more extensive SN involvement. Patients with ITC should be considered for CLND.


Melanoma Sentinel lymph node Metastasis Isolated tumor cells 


  1. 1.
    Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992; 127(4):392–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220(3):391–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen SL, Iddings DM, Scheri RP, Bilchik AJ. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node analysis: current concepts and applications. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56(5):292–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2005; 242(3):302–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(13):1307–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McMasters KM, Reintgen DS, Ross MI, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: controversy despite widespread agreement. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(11):2851–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elias N, Tanabe KK, Sober AJ, et al. Is completion lymphadenectomy after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma always necessary? Arch Surg 2004; 139(4):400–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Starz H, Balda BR, Kramer KU, et al. A micromorphometry-based concept for routine classification of sentinel lymph node metastases and its clinical relevance for patients with melanoma. Cancer 2001; 91(11):2110–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scolyer RA, Li LX, McCarthy SW, et al. Micromorphometric features of positive sentinel lymph nodes predict involvement of nonsentinel nodes in patients with melanoma. Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 122(4):532–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dewar DJ, Newell B, Green MA, et al. The microanatomic location of metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph nodes predicts nonsentinel lymph node involvement. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(16):3345–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee JH, Essner R, Torisu-Itakura H, et al. Factors predictive of tumor-positive nonsentinel lymph nodes after tumor-positive sentinel lymph node dissection for melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(18):3677–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sabel MS, Griffith K, Sondak VK, et al. Predictors of nonsentinel lymph node positivity in patients with a positive sentinel node for melanoma. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201(1):37–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Czerniecki BJ, Scheff AM, Callans LS, et al. Immunohistochemistry with pancytokeratins improves the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 85(5):1098–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Akkooi AC, de Wilt JH, Verhoef C, et al. Clinical relevance of melanoma micrometastases (<0.1 mm) in sentinel nodes: are these nodes to be considered negative? Ann Oncol 2006; 17(10):1578–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Govindarajan A, Ghazarian DM, McCready DR, Leong WL. Histological features of melanoma sentinel lymph node metastases associated with status of the completion lymphadenectomy and rate of subsequent relapse. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14(2):906–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morton DL, Thompson JF, Essner R, et al. Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group. Ann Surg 1999; 230(4):453–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cochran AJ, Wen DR, Morton DL. Occult tumor cells in the lymph nodes of patients with pathological stage I malignant melanoma. An immunohistological study. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12(8):612–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gershenwald JE, Thompson W, Mansfield PF, et al. Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(3):976–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takeuchi H, Morton DL, Kuo C, et al. Prognostic significance of molecular upstaging of paraffin-embedded sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(13):2671–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kammula US, Ghossein R, Bhattacharya S, Coit DG. Serial follow-up and the prognostic significance of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction—staged sentinel lymph nodes from melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(19):3989–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scoggins CR, Ross MI, Reintgen DS, et al. Prospective multi-institutional study of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for molecular staging of melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(18):2849–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wong SL, Morton DL, Thompson JF, et al. Melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes who did not undergo completion lymphadenectomy: a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13(6):809–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randall P. Scheri
    • 1
  • Richard Essner
    • 1
  • Roderick R. Turner
    • 2
  • Xing Ye
    • 3
  • Donald L. Morton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical OncologyJohn Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John’s Health CenterSanta MonicaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PathologySaint John’s Health CenterSanta MonicaUSA
  3. 3.Biostatistical UnitJohn Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John’s Health CenterSanta MonicaUSA

Personalised recommendations