Risk Criteria and Prognostic Factors for Predicting Recurrences After Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
- 603 Downloads
The introduction of adjuvant imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) raised debate over the accuracy of National Institutes of Health risk criteria and the significance of other prognostic factors in GIST.
Tumor aggressiveness and other clinicopathological factors influencing disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed in 335 patients with primary resectable CD117-immunopositive GISTs (median follow-up, 31 months after primary tumor resection) from a prospectively collected tumor registry.
Overall median DFS was 37 months, and estimated 5-year DFS was 37.8 %. In univariate analysis, high or intermediate risk group (P < .000001), mitotic index >5/50 high-power field (P < .00001), primary tumor size >5 cm (P < .00001), nongastric primary location (P = .0001), male sex (P = .01), R1 resection/tumor rupture (P = .0003), and epithelioid cell or mixed cell pathological subtype (P = .05) negatively affected DFS. In multivariate analysis, statistically significant factors negatively influencing DFS for model 1 were mitotic index >5/50 high-power field (P = .004), primary tumor size >5 cm (P = .001), male sex (P = .003), R1 resection/tumor rupture (P = .04), and nongastric primary tumor location (P = .02), and for model 2 were high/intermediate risk primary tumor (P < .0001 and P = .008, respectively), male sex (P = .007), resection R1/tumor rupture (P = .01), and nongastric primary tumor location (P = .02). Five-year DFS for high, intermediate, and low/very low risk group was 20%, 54%, and 96%, respectively.
The risk criteria for assessing the natural course of primary GISTs were validated, but additional independent prognostic factors—primary tumor location and sex—were also identified.
KeywordsGastrointestinal stromal tumor Surgery Prognosis
Supported by the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research, grant 3P05C05925. We thank all doctors devoted to GIST treatment and diagnosis who collaborated in the Polish Clinical GIST Registry, M. Rosinska for statistical advice, and J. Lasota (Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC) for critical remarks and mutational analyses data.
- 9.Debiec-Rychter M, Dumez H, et al. EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Use of c-KIT/PDGFRA mutational analysis to predict the clinical response to imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours entered on phase I and II studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40:689–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. New York: J Wiley and Sons, 1999Google Scholar
- 21.Miettinen M, Furlong M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Burke A, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, intramural leiomyomas, and leiomyosarcomas in the rectum and anus. A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 144 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25:1121–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kindblom LG, Meis KindBlom J, Bumming P, et al. Incidence, prevalence, phenotype and biologic spectrum of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a population based study of 600 cases. Ann Oncol 2003; 13:157Google Scholar
- 28.Buemming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG, et al. Is there an indication for adjuvant treatment with imatinib mesylate in patients with aggressive gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)? (abstract 3289). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; 22:818Google Scholar
- 32.Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, Shimoda T. Clinicopathologic study of primary malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach, with special reference to prognostic factors: analysis of results in 140 surgically resected patients. Gastric Cancer 2003; 6:39–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar