Current Issues in Adjuvant Treatment of Stage II Colon Cancer
- 312 Downloads
Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil modulated by folinic acid, combined with oxaliplatin, has now become an accepted standard of care for patients with stage III colon cancer. In contrast, the use of adjuvant therapy for stage II patients remains controversial, and the identification of reliable prognostic factors to aid therapeutic decision making is crucial.
The authors critically review the results of clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating the value of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II patients, emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of this population and the difficulty of performing clinical trials with sufficient power to reliably assess treatment efficacy. They also discuss the evidence concerning potential prognostic factors, particularly molecular markers.
Available clinical trial data do not support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for all stage II patients but suggest that it should be considered, particularly for certain high-risk patients. Recent guidelines advocate considering factors such as tumor differentiation, tumor perforation, number of lymph nodes examined, and T stage when assessing the likely benefit:risk ratio. Microsatellite instability and allelic imbalance seem to be strong predictors of good and poor prognosis, respectively, and in the near future, therapeutic decision-making models are likely to be further refined by the inclusion of such molecular markers.
There is growing evidence that the prognosis of certain stage II patients with unfavorable prognostic factors can be improved by adjuvant chemotherapy, and increasingly refined tools are now available to define those most likely to benefit. Referral of stage II patients for individual assessment is strongly recommended.
KeywordsColon cancer, stage II Adjuvant chemotherapy 5-Fluorouracil Leucovorin Oxaliplatin
This article was derived from discussions at a meeting on adjuvant therapy of colon cancer organized by Aimery de Gramont, with financial support from Sanofi-Synthelabo, in September 2003. The authors thank Paula Harry (MediBridge, France) for medical writing support.
- 1.Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-analysis Project. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rate. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10:896–903Google Scholar
- 6.Grothey A, Deschler B, Kroening H, et al. Phase III study of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) (Mayo) vs. weekly high-dose 24h 5-FU infusion/FA + oxaliplatin (OXA) (FUFOX) in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) (abstract 512). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21:129aGoogle Scholar
- 10.Datamonitor. Treatment Algorithms: Colorectal Cancer 5th Edition—New Gold Standards Emerge but Unmet Need Remains. 2003. Available at: http://www.datamonitor.com/∼5316ab639141457fb1e7238dae8507c9∼/industries/research/?pid=DMHC1816&type=Report. Accessed: June 21, 2005
- 17.Haller DG, Catalano PJ, MacDonald JS, Mayer RJ. Fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin (LV) and levamisole (LEV) adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: five-year report of INT-0089 (abstract 982). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17:256aGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wolmark N, Rockette H, Mamounas E, et al. Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes’ B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:3553–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wolmark N, Wieand HS, Kuebler JP, Colangelo L, Smith RE. A phase III trial comparing FULV to FULV + oxaliplatin in stage II or III carcinoma of the colon: results of NSABP protocol C07 (abstract 3500). J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(16 Suppl; Pt 2 of 2):1092sGoogle Scholar
- 21.Mamounas E, Wieand S, Wolmark N, et al. Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes’ B vs. Dukes’ C colon cancer: results from four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04). J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1349–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.International Multicentre Pooled Analysis of B2 Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT B2) Investigators. Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid in B2 colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1356–63Google Scholar
- 25.Adjuvant systemic therapy tools. Available at: http://www.mayoclinic.com/calcs. Accessed: June 21, 2005
- 28.Meta-Analysis Group of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and the Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Efficacy of oral adjuvant therapy after resection of colorectal cancer: 5-year results from three randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:484–92Google Scholar
- 30.Gray RG, Barnwell J, Hills R, et al. QUASAR: a randomized study of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) vs. observation including 3238 colorectal cancer patients (abstract 3501). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2004; 23:246Google Scholar
- 32.Cassidy J, Scheithauer W, McKendrick J, et al. Capecitabine (X) vs. bolus 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer (the X-ACT study): efficacy results of a phase III trial (abstract 3509). J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(14 Suppl):315sGoogle Scholar
- 33.Wolmark N, Wieand S, Lembersky B, Colangelo L, Smith R, Pazdur R. A phase III trial comparing oral UFT to FULV in stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: results of NSABP Protocol C-06 (abstract 3508). J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(14 Suppl):315sGoogle Scholar
- 34.Hickish T, Boni C, Navarro M, et al. Stage II patients in the “MOSAIC” trial evaluating oxaliplatin/5FU/LV as adjuvant treatment of colon cancer: a subpopulation analysis (abstract 284P). Ann Oncol 2004; 15(Suppl 3):iii76Google Scholar
- 38.AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002Google Scholar
- 61.Garrity MM, Burgart LJ, Mahoney MR, et al. Prognostic value of proliferation, apoptosis, defective DNA mismatch repair, and p53 overexpression in patients with resected Dukes’ B2 or C colon cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:1572–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar