Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 413–424 | Cite as

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

  • Omer Aziz
  • Vasilis Constantinides
  • Paris P. Tekkis
  • Thanos Athanasiou
  • Sanjay Purkayastha
  • Paraskevas Paraskeva
  • Ara W. Darzi
  • Alexander G. Heriot
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery aims to provide patients with curative resection while minimizing postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study used meta-analytical techniques to compare laparoscopic and open surgery as the primary treatment for patients with rectal cancer with regard to short-term and long-term outcomes.

Methods

A literature search was performed on all studies between 1993 and 2004 comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. The following end points were evaluated: operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and early and late adverse events.

Results

Twenty studies matched the selection criteria and reported on 2071 subjects, of whom 909 (44%) underwent laparoscopic and 1162 (56%) underwent open surgery for rectal cancer. Time to stomal function (weighted mean difference [WMD], −1.52; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], −2.20, −1.01), first bowel movement (WMD, −.72; 95% CI, −1.21, −.22), feeding solids (WMD, −.92; 95% CI, −1.35, −.50), and length of hospital stay (WMD, −2.67; 95% CI, −3.81, −1.54) were all significantly reduced after laparoscopic surgery. In patients who underwent abdominoperineal excision of the rectum, wound infection (odds ratio, .15; 95% CI, .03, .73) and requirement for postoperative parenteral analgesia (WMD, −.63; 95% CI, −1.22, −.04) were also significantly reduced. There was no difference between groups in the extent of oncological clearance.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery results in an earlier postoperative recovery and a resected specimen that is oncologically comparable to open surgery. Results from randomized trials reporting long-term outcomes such as cancer recurrence (local and metastatic) and 5-year survival are eagerly awaited.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Rectal cancer Curative resection Comparative. 

References

  1. 1.
    Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 1995;82:1297–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:638–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Havenga K, Enker WE, McDermott K, et al. Male and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 1996;182:495–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Masui H, Ike H, Yamaguchi S, et al. Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1140–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kinn AC, Ohman U. Bladder and sexual function after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:43–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–9Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:1111–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Araujo SE, da Silva eSousa AH Jr, de Campos FG, et al. Conventional approach × laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2003;58:133–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89:1551–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Skapinakis P, et al. Leg wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:2141–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Mangoush O, et al. Do off-pump techniques reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1567–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clarke M. Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.1.3. Oxford: The Cochrane Library, Update Software, 2001Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Onkologie 2000;23:597–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, et al. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985;27:335–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taggart DP, D’Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 2001;358:870–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:745–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Egger M, Smith GD. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 1995;311:753–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Darzi A, Lewis C, Menzies-Gow N, et al. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Surg Endosc 1995;9:414–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goh YC, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Early postoperative results of a prospective series of laparoscopic vs. open anterior resections for rectosigmoid cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:776–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lau WY, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. Immediate and medium-term results. Arch Surg 1997;132:761–4; discussion 765PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seow-Choen F, Eu KW, Ho YH, Leong AF. A preliminary comparison of a consecutive series of open versus laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997;12:88–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ramos JR, Petrosemolo RH, Valory EA, et al. Abdominoperineal resection: laparoscopic versus conventional. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997;7:148–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iroatulam AJ, Agachan F, Alabaz O, et al. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for anorectal cancer. Am Surg 1998;64:12–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fleshman JW, Wexner SD, Anvari M, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:930–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Killaitis C, Bruch HP. A case-control-study comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1999;14:158–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lau WY, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2000;14:67–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE, et al. Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:315–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Baker RP, White EE, Titu L, et al. Does laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of the rectum compromise long-term survival? Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1481–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anthuber M, Fuerst A, Elser F, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1047–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1530–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hu JK, Zhou ZG, Chen ZX, et al. Comparative evaluation of immune response after laparoscopical and open total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:2690–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vorob’ev GI, Shelygin Iu A, Frolov SA, et al. Laparoscopic surgery of rectal cancer (comparative results of laparoscopic and open abdominal resection) (in Russian). Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2003;3:36–42Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wu WX, Sun YM, Hua YB, Shen LZ. Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection of rectal carcinoma: a clinical comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:1167–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, et al. Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years. Hepatogastroenterology 2002;49:1185–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Di Matteo G, Peparini N. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery in rectal carcinoma (in Italian). G Chir 2002;23:117–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tate JJ, Kwok S, Dawson JW, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and conventional anterior resection. Br J Surg 1993;80:1396–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2002;287:321–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW. Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:177–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lumley J, Stitz R, Stevenson A, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:867–72; discussion 872–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, et al. Determinants of outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multiple regression analysis of 416 resections. Surg Endosc 2000;14:258–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 2005;242:83–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omer Aziz
    • 1
  • Vasilis Constantinides
    • 1
  • Paris P. Tekkis
    • 1
  • Thanos Athanasiou
    • 1
  • Sanjay Purkayastha
    • 1
  • Paraskevas Paraskeva
    • 1
  • Ara W. Darzi
    • 1
  • Alexander G. Heriot
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Oncology & TechnologyImperial College London, St. Mary’s HospitalLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations