Skip to main content
Log in

A Colourful Way to Unravel the Important Fluidization-Related Granule Size Effect on Semi-Continuous Drying

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuous twin screw wet granulation (TSWG) systems are possible pathways for oral solid dosage manufacturing in the pharmaceutical industry. TSWG requires a drying step after granulation before the tableting process. Typically, semi-continuous fluidized bed dryers (FBDs) are used for this purpose. At the same time, the pharmaceutical sector is interested in mathematical prediction models to save resources during the early drug product development (DPD) stage or to control manufacturing. Several authors have already developed prediction models for semi-continuous drying processes. However, these model structures reported systematic prediction offsets, which could be related to the incomplete implementation of fluidization and granule segregation phenomena. This study evaluates the complex fluidization behavior of wet granules in industrially relevant semi-continuous FBDs. A transparent perspex version of the dryer was used for the analysis of bed height, pressure drop, porosity, segregation, and spatial heating patterns at varying process settings. The investigated behaviors of the fluidizing bed will be helpful to derive phenomenological (sub)models for the detailed description of segregation in the semi-continuous fluidized bed system. In this study, it was found that semi-continuous FBDs are characterized by a change in fluidization regime from plug flow to a bubbling bed at the moment that the granule bed slumps. Secondly, the presence of size-based vertical segregation phenomena as well as spatial temperature differences were proven. The experimental results suggest that larger granules are dried under more intense drying conditions than smaller granules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Abbr.:

Description

API :

active pharmaceutical ingredient

C1 :

ConsiGma™-1

C25 :

ConsiGma™-25

CQA :

critical quality attribute

DPD :

drug product development

FBD :

fluidized bed dryer

GSD :

granule size distribution

LS :

liquid-to-solid

MFR :

mass flow rate

QbD :

quality by design

TSWG :

twin-screw wet granulation

References

  1. Stauffer F, Boulanger E, Pilcer G. Sampling and diversion strategy for twin-screw granulation lines using batch statistical process monitoring. European J Pharma Sci. 2022;171:106126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aaltonen J, Kogermann K, Strachan CJ, Rantanen J. In-line monitoring of solid-state transitions during fluidisation. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62(1):408–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee SL, O’Connor TF, Yang X, Cruz CN, Chatterjee S, Madurawe RD, et al. Modernizing pharmaceutical manufacturing: from batch to continuous production. J Pharma Innov. 2015;10(3):191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vandeputte T, Ghijs M, Van Hauwermeiren D, Dos Santos Schultz E, Schäfer E, Fanny S, et al. Mechanistic modeling of semicontinuous fluidized bed drying of pharmaceutical granules by incorporating single particle and bulk drying kinetics. In J Pharma 2023;:123447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123447.

  5. Wormsbecker M, Adams A, Pugsley T, Winters C. Segregation by size difference in a conical fluidized bed of pharmaceutical granulate. Powder Technol. 2005;153(1):72–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khanna P, Pugsley T, Tanfara H, Dumont H. Radioactive particle tracking in a lab-scale conical fluidized bed dryer containing pharmaceutical granule. Canadian J Chem Eng. 2008;86(3):563–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahl S, Hrenya C. Size segregation in gas–solid fluidized beds with continuous size distributions. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60(23):6658–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luthra K, Sadaka S. Investigation of rough rice drying in fixed and fluidized bed dryers utilizing dehumidified air as a drying agent. Drying Technol. 2021;39(8):1059–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Anantharaman A, Cocco RA, Chew JW. Evaluation of correlations for minimum fluidization velocity in gas-solid fluidization. Powder Technol. 2018;323:454–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson JF, Harrison D. Fluidised particles. Cambridge University Press; 1963.

  11. Kunii D, Levenspiel O. Fluidization engineering. Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991.

  12. Gunn D. Transfer of heat or mass to particles in fixed and fluidised beds. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 1978;21(4):467–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(78)90080-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganzha V, Upadhyay S, Saxena S. A mechanistic theory for heat transfer between fluidized beds of large particles and immersed surfaces. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 1982;25(10):1531–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(82)90032-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou ZY, Yu AB, Zulli P. Particle scale study of heat transfer in packed and bubbling fluidized beds. AIChE Journal. 2009;55(4):868–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11823.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou Z, Yu A, Zulli P. A new computational method for studying heat transfer in fluid bed reactors. Powder Technol. 2010;197(1):102–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.09.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Basu P, Nag P. An investigation into heat transfer in circulating fluidized beds. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 1987;30(11):2399–409.

  17. Van Heerden C, Nobel A, Van Krevelen D. Mechanism of heat transfer in fluidized beds. Ind Eng Chem. 1953;45(6):1237–42.

  18. Borodulya V, Epanov YG, Ganzha V, Tephtskii YS. Heat transfer in fluidized beds. J Eng Phys Thermophysics. 1986;49(4):621–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Valenzuela J, Glicksman L. An experimental study of solids mixing in a freely bubbling two-dimensional fluidized bed. Powder Technol. 1984;38(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(84)80034-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsuji T, Miyauchi T, Oh S, Tanaka T. Simultaneous measurement of particle motion and temperature in two-dimensional fluidized bed with heat transfer. KONA Powder Particle J. 2010;28:167–79. https://doi.org/10.14356/kona.2010015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Patil AV, Peters E, Sutkar VS, Deen N, Kuipers J. A study of heat transfer in fluidized beds using an integrated dia/piv/ir technique. Chem Eng J. 2015;259:90–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lakio S, Heinämäki J, Yliruusi J. Colorful drying. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-009-9351-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chiba S, Chiba T, Nienow A, Kobayashi H. The minimum fluidisation velocity, bed expansion and pressure-drop profile of binary particle mixtures. Powder Technol. 1979;22(2):255–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(79)80031-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hui Wang Z, Chen G. Heat and mass transfer in batch fluidized-bed drying of porous particles. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55(10):1857–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00446-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gauthier D, Zerguerras S, Flamant G. Influence of the particle size distribution of powders on the velocities of minimum and complete fluidization. Chem Eng J. 1999;74(3):181–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Cheng Y, Jin Y, Bi HT. On impacts of solid properties and operating conditions on the performance of gas-solid fluidization systems. Powder Technol. 2006;172(3):167–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mortier S, De Beer T, Gernaey K, Vercruysse J, Fonteyne M, Remon JP, et al. Mechanistic modelling of the drying behaviour of single pharmaceutical granules. European J Pharma Biopharmaceutics. 2012;80(3):682–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghijs M, Schäfer E, Kumar A, Cappuyns P, Van Assche I, De Leersnyder F, et al. Modeling of semicontinuous fluid bed drying of pharmaceutical granules with respect to granule size. J Pharma Sci. 2019;108(6):2094–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Ghent University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T. Vandeputte: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft M. Ghijs: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Validation, Writing - review & editing I. Nopens: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing - review & editing, Project administration T. De Beer: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Validation,Writing - review & editing, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuur Vandeputte.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vandeputte, T., Ghijs, M., Nopens, I. et al. A Colourful Way to Unravel the Important Fluidization-Related Granule Size Effect on Semi-Continuous Drying. AAPS PharmSciTech 25, 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-023-02711-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-023-02711-8

Keywords

Navigation