Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization and Application of an Efficient and Stable Inhalation Exposure System for Rodents

  • Research Article
  • Theme: Inhaled Drug Delivery of Biologics for Therapeutic and Vaccination
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Inhalation is a promising and challenging method in pharmaceutical and biological science research. A stable environment is critical in dynamic inhalation administration. However, the establishment of a stable inhalation system is very challenging. Indacaterol glycopyrronium bromide inhalation powder (IM/GP mixed powder) is composed of indacaterol maleate and glycopyrronium bromide powder to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study is to build suitable inhalation conditions and then to evaluate the pulmonary safety of this drug in Sprague-Dawley(SD) rats. In the research, through the coordination of the atomization flow, air pump flow, and scraper speed, aerosols were stabilized at 200 ± 20% mg/m3, and then rats were nose-only administered with the IM/GP mixed powder, Ultibro, and lactose-magnesium stearate mixed powder at 2.6 mg/kg/day for 14 days and 14 days of recovery period, respectively. After exposure, hematology, inflammatory cytokines in rats bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and serum, histopathological examination were performed. Results showed that the stability of powder aerosols can be realized under the atomization generation flow: 10 L/min, sampling flow: 2 L/min, system pumping capacity: 10 L/min and powder scraper speed: 8–10 L/min, and there were no significant adverse effects on body weight, clinic signs, hematology, and pathology in rats. Overall, the results suggested that the IM/GP mixed powder inhalation at the dose of 2.6 mg/kg/d can be reached when the aerosol concentration is within the range of 200 ± 20% mg/m3, and there were no pulmonary toxicity effects in rats.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available upon request.

REFERENCES

  1. Depreter F, Pilcer G, Amighi K. Inhaled proteins: Challenges and perspectives. Int J Pharm. 2013;447(1-2):251–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanchis J, Corrigan C, Levy ML, Viejo JL. Inhaler devices—from theory to practice. Respir Med. 2013;107(4):495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang MY, Chan JG, Chan HK. Pulmonary drug delivery by powder aerosols. J Control Release. 2014;193:228–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ibrahim M, Verma R, Garcia-Contreras L. Inhalation drug delivery devices: Technology update. Med Devices. 2015;8:131–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pirozynski M, Sosnowski TR. Inhalation devices: From basic science to practical use, innovative vs generic products. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13(11):1559–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moon C, Smyth HDC, Watts AB, Williams RO 3rd. Delivery technologies for orally inhaled products: An update. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019;20(3):019–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiu Y, Liao Q, Chow MYT, Lam JKW. Intratracheal administration of dry powder formulation in mice. J Vis Exp. 2020;25(161):61469.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morimoto Y, Izumi H, Yoshiura Y, Fujishima K, Yatera K, Yamamoto K. Usefulness of intratracheal instillation studies for estimating nanoparticle-induced pulmonary toxicity. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(2).

  9. Nielsen TB, Yan J, Luna B, Spellberg B. Murine oropharyngeal aspiration model of ventilator-associated and hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia. J Vis Exp. 2018;28(136):57672.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kao RL, Huang W, Martin CM, Rui T. The effect of aerosolized indomethacin on lung inflammation and injury in a rat model of blunt chest trauma. Can J Surg. 2018;61(6):S208–S18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pauluhn J. Overview of inhalation exposure techniques: Strengths and weaknesses. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2005;1:111–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Phalen RF, Mannix RC, Drew RT. Inhalation exposure methodology. Environ Health Perspect. 1984;56:23–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Świercz R, Wąsowicz W. The distribution and excretion of 1-Methylnaphthalene in rats exposed to 1-Methylnaphthalene by inhalation. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018;31(6):763–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong BA. Inhalation exposure systems: design, methods and operation. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(1):3–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pauluhn J, Mohr U. Inhalation studies in laboratory animals—current concepts and alternatives. Toxicol Pathol. 2000;28(5):734–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng YS. Mechanisms of pharmaceutical aerosol deposition in the respiratory tract. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15(3):630–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolli AR, Kuczaj AK, Martin F, Hayes AW, Peitsch MC, Hoeng J. Bridging inhaled aerosol dosimetry to physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for toxicological assessment: nicotine delivery systems and beyond. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2019;49(9):725–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patil TS, Deshpande A, Shende PK, Deshpande S, Gaud R. Evaluation of nanocarrier-based dry powder formulations for inhalation with special reference to anti-tuberculosis drugs. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2019;36(3):239–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Viniol C, Vogelmeier CF. Exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27(147):0103–2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, Celli BR, Chen R, Decramer M, Fabbri LM, Frith P, Halpin DMG, López Varela MV, Nishimura M, Roche N, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Sin DD, Singh D, Stockley R, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report. GOLD Executive Summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(5):557–82.

  21. GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(9):691–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30293-X.

  22. Mirza S, Clay RD, Koslow MA, Scanlon PD. COPD guidelines: a review of the 2018 GOLD report. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(10):1488–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(5):1256–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodriquez-Roisin R. Twenty years of GOLD (1997–2017). The origins. 2020. https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/GOLD-Origins-Final-Version-mar19.pdf.

  25. Horita N, Nagashima A, Kaneko T. Long-acting β-agonists (LABA) combined with long-acting muscarinic antagonists or LABA combined with inhaled corticosteroids for patients with stable COPD. Jama. 2017;318(13):1274–5.

  26. Terry PD, Dhand R. Inhalation therapy for stable COPD: 20 years of GOLD reports. Adv Ther. 2020;37(5):1812–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bolon B, Baze W, Shilling CJ, Keatley KL, Patrick DJ, Schafer KA. Good laboratory practice in the academic setting: fundamental principles for nonclinical safety assessment and GLP-compliant pathology support when developing innovative biomedical products. ILAR J. 2018;59(1):18–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nussberger J, Aubert JF, Bouzourene K, Pellegrin M, Hayoz D, Mazzolai L. Renin inhibition by aliskiren prevents atherosclerosis progression: Comparison with irbesartan, atenolol, and amlodipine. Hypertension. 2008;51(5):1306–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Alexander DJ, Collins CJ, Coombs DW, Gilkison IS, Hardy CJ, Healey G, Karantabias G, Johnson N, Karlsson A, Kilgour JD, McDonald P. Association of Inhalation Toxicologists (AIT) working party recommendation for standard delivered dose calculation and expression in non-clinical aerosol inhalation toxicology studies with pharmaceuticals. Inhal Toxicol. 2008;20(13):1179–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. OECD. Test No. 412: subacute inhalation toxicity: 28-day study, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070783-en.

  31. Riva DR, Magalhães CB, Lopes AA, Lanças T, Mauad T, Malm O, Valença SS, Saldiva PH, Faffe DS, Zin WA. Low dose of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) can induce acute oxidative stress, inflammation and pulmonary impairment in healthy mice. Inhal Toxicol. 2011;23(5):257–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. DiPietro LA, Burdick M, Low QE, Kunkel SL, Strieter RM. MIP-1alpha as a critical macrophage chemoattractant in murine wound repair. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(8):1693–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Wang H, Zhang C, Zhang C, Yang H, Gao R, Tong Z. Lung fluid biomarkers for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):019–2336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Barnes PJ, Burney PG, Silverman EK, Celli BR, Vestbo J, Wedzicha JA, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1(15076):76.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yoon HK, Park YB, Rhee CK, Lee JH, Oh YM. Summary of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease clinical practice guideline revised in 2014 by the korean academy of tuberculosis and respiratory disease. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2017;80(3):230–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 2008;22(3):659–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Choi HY, Lee YH, Lim CH, Kim YS, Lee IS, Jo JM, Lee HY, Cha HG, Woo HJ, Seo DS. Assessment of respiratory and systemic toxicity of Benzalkonium chloride following a 14-day inhalation study in rats. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2020;17(1):020–0339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lim D, Jeong J, Song KS, Sung JH, Oh SM, Choi J. Inhalation toxicity of polystyrene micro(nano)plastics using modified OECD TG 412. Chemosphere. 2021;262(128330):13.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Labiris NR, Dolovich MB. Pulmonary drug delivery. Part I: Physiological factors affecting therapeutic effectiveness of aerosolized medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(6):588–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Martin AR, Moore CP, Finlay WH. Models of deposition, pharmacokinetics, and intersubject variability in respiratory drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2018;15(12):1175–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zanen P, Go LT, Lammers JW. The efficacy of a low-dose, monodisperse parasympathicolytic aerosol compared with a standard aerosol from a metered-dose inhaler. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Yangteng Ou (University of Cambridge, UK) for some proofreading work.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (81773479), the National Major Science and Technology Projects of China under Grant (2017ZX09201002-004), and the research project of Jiangsu Commission of Health (H201634).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZF: methodology, investigation, validation, data curation, writing—original draft. BZ: methodology, validation, investigation, writing—review and editing. YL: methodology, investigation, validation, writing—review and editing. WS: methodology, investigation, formal analysis. YF: validation, resources, data curation. HL: formal analysis, writing—review and editing. DC: validation, writing—review and editing. KL: validation, writing—review and editing. XW: writing—review and editing. TX: writing—review and editing. WX: resources, writing—review and editing. QB: conceptualization, resources, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Bian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, Z., Zhou, B., Liu, Y. et al. Optimization and Application of an Efficient and Stable Inhalation Exposure System for Rodents. AAPS PharmSciTech 23, 50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-021-02191-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-021-02191-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation