Skip to main content
Log in

Is “Slow Inhalation” Always Suitable for Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler?

  • Rapid Communication
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To achieve adequate inhalation therapy, a proper inhalation technique is needed in clinical practice. However, there is limited information on proper inhalation flow patterns of commercial inhalers. Here, we quantitatively estimated airway deposition of two commercial pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) to determine their optimal inhalation patterns. Sultanol® inhaler (drug particles suspended in a propellant, suspension-pMDI) and QVAR™ (drug dissolved in a propellant with ethanol, solution-pMDI) were used as model pMDIs. Aerodynamic properties of the two pMDIs were determined using an Andersen cascade impactor with human inhalation flow simulator developed by our laboratory. As indices of peripheral-airway drug deposition, fine particle fractions (FPFPA) at different inhalation flow rates were calculated. The time-dependent particle diameters of sprayed drug particles were determined by laser diffraction. On aerodynamic testing, FPFPA of suspension-pMDI significantly decreased depending on the increasing inhalation flow rate, while solution-pMDI achieved higher and constant FPFPA in the range of the tested inhalation flow rates. The particle diameter of solution-pMDI markedly decreased from 5 to 3 μm in a time-dependent manner. Conversely, that of suspension-pMDI remained at 4 μm during the spraying time. Although “slow inhalation” is recommended for pMDIs, airway drug deposition via solution-pMDI (extra-fine particles) is independent of patients’ inhalation flow pattern. Clinical studies should be performed to validate instruction for use of pMDIs for each inhaler for the optimization of inhalation therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Laube BL, Janssens HM, De Jongh FHC, Devadason SG, Dhand R, Diot P, et al. What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:1308–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hira D, Okuda T, Kito D, Ishizeki K, Okada T, Okamoto H. Inhalation performance of physically mixed dry powders evaluated with a simple simulator for human inspiratory flow patterns. Pharm Res. 2010;27:2131–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laube BL, Norman PS, Adams GK. The effect of aerosol distribution on airway responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in patients with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;89:510–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hira D, Okuda T, Mizutani A, Tomida N, Okamoto H. In vitro evaluation of optimal inhalation flow patterns for commercial dry powder inhalers and pressurized metered dose inhalers with human inhalation flow pattern simulator. J Pharm Sci. 2018.

  5. Hira D, Koide H, Nakamura S, Okada T, Ishizeki K, Yamaguchi M, et al. Assessment of inhalation flow patterns of soft mist inhaler co-prescribed with dry powder inhaler using inspiratory flow meter for multi inhalation devices. PLoS One. 2018;13.

  6. van Aalderen WMC, Grigg J, Guilbert TW, Roche N, Israel E, Martin RJ, et al. Small-particle Inhaled Corticosteroid as First-line or Step-up Controller Therapy in Childhood Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2015;3:721–731.e16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2015.04.012

  7. Colice G, Martin RJ, Israel E, Roche N, Barnes N, Burden A, et al. Asthma outcomes and costs of therapy with extrafine beclomethasone and fluticasone. J Allergy Clin Immunol [internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Sep 28]. 132:45–54.e10 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23591272.

  8. Watling CP, Elliott JA, Cameron RE. Entrainment of lactose inhalation powders: A study using laser diffraction. Eur J Pharm Sci [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2010;40:352–358. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2010.04.009

  9. Heyder J. Deposition of inhaled particles in the human respiratory tract and consequences for regional targeting in respiratory drug delivery. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2004;1:315–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (2019 update) [Internet]. Glob. Initiat. Asthma. 2019. Available from: http://www.ginasthma.org

  11. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (2019 Report) [Internet]. 2019. Available from: www.goldcopd.org

  12. Singh D, Papi A, Corradi M, Pavlišová I, Montagna I, Francisco C, et al. Single inhaler triple therapy versus inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β2-agonist therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRILOGY): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet [internet]. Elsevier Ltd. 2016;388:963–73. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31354-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to express thanks for the technical help given by Malvern Panalytical Ltd. for measurement of particle diameters.

Funding

This work was supported by Nakatomi Foundation and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K15504.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirokazu Okamoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hira, D., Okuda, T., Mizutani, A. et al. Is “Slow Inhalation” Always Suitable for Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler?. AAPS PharmSciTech 21, 53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-019-1610-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-019-1610-x

Keywords

Navigation