Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of Microcrystalline Cellulose for Improving Drug Content Uniformity in Tablet Manufacturing Using Direct Powder Compression

  • Brief/Technical Note
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct powder compression is the simplest tablet manufacturing method. However, segregation occurs when the drug content is low. It is difficult to assure drug content uniformity in these cases. In this study, we evaluated microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a segregation inhibitor in pharmaceutical powders. We assessed the influence of MCC concentration and mixing time on the physical properties of tablets. The tablet formulation comprised acetaminophen, lactose hydrate, cornstarch, MCC (0%, 10%, or 20%), croscarmellose sodium, and magnesium stearate (Mg-St). All powders except Mg-St were premixed for 5, 15, or 25 min. Mg-St was then added and mixed for 5 min to prepare nine pharmaceutical powders. Flowability index and practical angle of internal friction were measured. Tablets were also prepared, and their weight variation, hardness, friability, disintegration time, and drug content variation were evaluated. MCC slightly decreased pharmaceutical powder flowability. Tablet hardness increased and disintegration time decreased with increasing MCC concentration. MCC mixed for ≥ 15 min also significantly lowered drug content variation. A contour plot was prepared to assess the effect of MCC concentration and mixing time on the physical properties of tablets. It was determined that tablets with 50–80 N hardness, ≤ 3.5 min disintegration time, and ≤ 3% drug content variation can be prepared when MCC concentration is 6.5–8.5% and the mixing time is 19–24 min. Therefore, MCC is effective as a segregation inhibitor, and the addition of MCC to tablet formulation improves drug content uniformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Kawashima Y. Introduction. In: The Society of Powder Technology, Japan: Division of Particulate Preparation and Design, editor. Compression molding technology of powder. Tokyo: Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Ltd.; 1998. p. 3–11.

  2. Blanco M, Alcalá M. Content uniformity and tablet hardness testing of intact pharmaceutical tablets by near infrared spectroscopy A contribution to process analytical technologies. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;557:353–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moes JJ, Ruijken MM, Gout E, Frijlink HW, Ugwoke MI. Application of process analytical technology in tablet process development using NIR spectroscopy: blend uniformity, content uniformity and coating thickness measurements. Int J Pharm. 2008;357:108–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodwin DJ, Ban S, Denham M, Barylski I. Real time release testing of tablet content and content uniformity. Int J Pharm. 2018;537:183–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Uniformity of dosage units. In: the Japanese pharmacopoeia, 17th ed. 2016. p. 133–5.

  6. Wang X, Cui F, Yonezawa Y, Sunada H. Preparation and evaluation of combination tablet containing incompatible active ingredients. Chem Pharm Bull. 2003;51:772–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takeuchi Y, Yoshida M, Ito A, Sunada H. Uniformity of drug content during pharmaceutical dry granulating by roller compaction and tableting processes. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2009;19:119–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahrous GM, Shaaban DEZ, Shazly GA, Auda SH. The effect of binder concentration and dry mixing time on granules, tablet characteristics and content uniformity of low dose drug in high shear wet granulation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2017;39:192–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun WJ, Aburub A, Sun CC. Particle engineering for enabling a formulation platform suitable for manufacturing low-dose tablets by direct compression. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:1772–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Furukawa K. Development of excipients for direct compression by fluidized bed granulation. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2018;34:93–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshida I, Sakai Y. The applications of the content uniformity test and the weight variation test on process validation tests of multiple ingredient preparations. Chem Pharm Bull. 1999;47:678–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Katori N, Aoyagi N, Kojima S. The study of the applicability of content uniformity and weight variation test–the state of commercial tablets and capsules in Japan. Chem Pharm Bull. 2001;49:1412–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lukášová I, Muselík J, Franc A, Goněc R, Mika F, Vetchý D. Factor analysis in optimization of formulation of high content uniformity tablets containing low dose active substance. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;109:541–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Makino T. The first of direct compression to accelerate pharmaceutical development and reduce cost of dosage form. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2017;33:2309–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hara Y. Development of direct tableting technology for Pletaal OD tablet. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2017;33:2313–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Katayama T, Terasawa K, Takeuchi T, Okuda Y. Formulation design of olanzapine orally disintegration tablet “TOWA” –direct compression–the first choice in the manufacture of tablets. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2017;33:2317–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Makino T, Hoshino T, Tsuchiya A, Oneda Y. Analysis and evaluation the super-high speed compression – securing of content uniformity. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2018;34:283–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura S, Yamaguchi S, Hiraide R, Iga K, Sakamoto T, Yuasa H. Setting ideal lubricant mixing time for manufacturing tablets by evaluating powder flowability. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017;18:2832–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Flow of powders. In: the Japanese pharmacopoeia, 17th ed. 2016. p. 2349–51.

  20. Carr RL. Evaluating flowability properties of solids. Chem Eng. 1965;18:163–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Standards Association: Direct shear testing method for critical state line (CSL) and wall yield locus (WYL) of powder bed. In: Japanese Industrial Standard. 2016. JIS Z 8835.

  22. Jenike AW, Elsey PJ, Woolley RH. Flow properties of bulk solids. Proc Am Soc Test Mat. 1960;60:1168–90.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murata H, Wakabayashi M, Egusa T. Flowability of coals by Jenike’s cell. J Soc Powder Technol Jpn. 1983;20:558–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hatano S, Wang L, Shimada Y. Evaluation of fine powder properties for pharmaceutical formulation by the powder bed shear stress analyzer NS-S series. J Pharmaceut Mach Eng. 2010;19:62–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shimada Y, Hatano S, Matsusaka S. A new method for evaluating powder flowability using constant volume shear tester. J Soc Powder Technol Jpn. 2017;54:90–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanino T. Theoretical analysis of the particle behavior in formulating unit processes and its application. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2009;25:773–88.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Imai K, Norioka T, Ibuki R. Pharmaceutical development applying to ICH Q8, Q9: case study of oral formulation. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2009;25:1747–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Norioka T, Hayashi Y, Onuki Y, Andou H. A novel approach to establishing the design space for the oral formulation manufacturing process. Chem Pharm Bull. 2013;61:39–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanino T. Overview of the standard formulation study focused on the granulation or lubrication degree as critical quality attributes in ICH Q8. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2012;28:2399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Takeda Y, Kurashima H, Yamada M. Process parameter analysis by dataNESIA. Pharm Tech Jpn. 2012;28:2403–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Obae K. Chapter 3: Properties of high-performance microcrystalline cellulose and its application as a pharmaceutical additive. In: Terada K, editor. Formulation design and physicochemical characterization for pharmaceutical excipients. Tokyo: CMC Publishing Co., Ltd; 2016. p. 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guilford JP. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw Hill; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guideline, ICH Harmonised Tripartite. Pharmaceutical development Q8(R2). Current step 4. 2009.

  34. Yu LX, Amidon G, Khan MA, Hoag SW, Polli J, Raju GK, et al. Understanding pharmaceutical quality by design. AAPS J. 2014;16:771–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Asahi Kasei Corp. for providing microcrystalline cellulose and croscarmellose sodium, and Freund Corp. for providing lactose hydrate.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shohei Nakamura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakamura, S., Tanaka, C., Yuasa, H. et al. Utility of Microcrystalline Cellulose for Improving Drug Content Uniformity in Tablet Manufacturing Using Direct Powder Compression. AAPS PharmSciTech 20, 151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-019-1365-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-019-1365-4

KEY WORDS

Navigation