Skip to main content

Development of Theranostic Perfluorocarbon Nanoemulsions as a Model Non-Opioid Pain Nanomedicine Using a Quality by Design (QbD) Approach

Abstract

Pain nanomedicine is an emerging field in response to current needs of addressing the opioid crisis in the USA and around the world. Our group has focused on the development of macrophage-targeted perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions as inflammatory pain nanomedicines over the past several years. We present here, for the first time, a quality by design approach used to design pain nanomedicine. Specifically, we used failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) which identified the process and composition parameters that were most likely to impact nanoemulsion critical quality attributes (CQAs). From here, we applied a unique combination approach that compared multiple linear regression, boosted decision tree regression, and partial least squares regression methods in combination with correlation plots. The presented combination approach allowed for in-depth analyses of which formulation steps in the nanoemulsification processes control nanoemulsion droplet diameter, stability, and drug loading. We identified that increase in solubilizer (transcutol) content increased drug loading and decreased nanoemulsion stability. This was mitigated by inclusion of perfluorocarbon oil in the internal phase. We observed negative correlation (R2 = 0.4357, p value 0.0054) between the amount of PCE and the percent diameter increase (destabilization), and no correlation between processing parameters and percent diameter increase over time. Further, we identified that increased sonication time decreases nanoemulsion drug loading but does not significantly impact droplet diameter or stability. We believe the methods presented here can be useful in the development of various nanomedicines to produce higher-quality products with enhanced manufacturing and design control.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Ventola CL. Progress in nanomedicine: approved and investigational Nanodrugs. P T. 2017;42(12):742–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fact Sheet - Pain Management. National Institutes of Health; 2010.

  3. 3.

    Yuangyai C, Nembhard HB. Design of experiments: a key to innovation in nanotechnology. In: Ahmed W, Jackson MJ, editors. Emerging nanotechnologies for manufacturing. 2nd ed. Waltham, MA: William Andrew; 2014. p. 230–54.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Li J, Qiao Y, Wu Z. Nanosystem trends in drug delivery using quality-by-design concept. J Control Release. 2017;256:9–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shah B, Khunt D, Bhatt H, Misra M, Padh H. Intranasal delivery of venlafaxine loaded nanostructured lipid carrier: risk assessment and QbD based optimization. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;33:37–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Srinivas NSK, Verma R, Kulyadi GP, Kumar L. A quality by design approach on polymeric nanocarrier delivery of gefitinib: formulation, in vitro, and in vivo characterization. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:15–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hormann K, Zimmer A. Drug delivery and drug targeting with parenteral lipid nanoemulsions - a review. J Control Release. 2016;223:85–98.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gupta A, Eral HB, Hatton TA, Doyle PS. Nanoemulsions: formation, properties and applications. Soft Matter. 2016;12(11):2826–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chavez-Zamudio R, Ochoa-Flores AA, Soto-Rodriguez I, Garcia-Varela R, Garcia HS. Preparation, characterization and bioavailability by oral administration of O/W curcumin nanoemulsions stabilized with lysophosphatidylcholine. Food Funct. 2017;8(9):3346–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Isailovic T, Ethordevic S, Markovic B, Randelovic D, Cekic N, Lukic M, et al. Biocompatible nanoemulsions for improved aceclofenac skin delivery: formulation approach using combined mixture-process experimental design. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(1):308–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kwasigroch B, Escribano E, Moran MDC, Queralt J, Busquets MA, Estelrich J. Oil-in-water nanoemulsions are suitable for carrying hydrophobic compounds: indomethacin as a model of anti-inflammatory drug. Int J Pharm. 2016;515(1–2):749–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pain relief: taking NSAIDs safely. Before you use these popular pain pills, weigh the heart risks and other side effects carefully. Harv Womens Health Watch. 2013;21(1):3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Filaretova LP, Bagaeva TR, Morozova OY, Zelena D. The healing of NSAID-induced gastric lesion may be followed by small intestinal and cardiovascular side effects. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011;62(6):619–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Maniar KH, Jones IA, Gopalakrishna R, Vangsness CT Jr. Lowering side effects of NSAID usage in osteoarthritis: recent attempts at minimizing dosage. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19(2):93–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mantry P, Shah A, Sundaram U. Celecoxib associated esophagitis: review of gastrointestinal side effects from cox-2 inhibitors. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;37(1):61–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Stollberger C, Finsterer J. Side effects of conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and celecoxib: more similarities than differences. South Med J. 2004;97(2):209.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gong L, Thorn CF, Bertagnolli MM, Grosser T, Altman RB, Klein TE. Celecoxib pathways: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22(4):310–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Payne R. Limitations of NSAIDs for pain management: toxicity or lack of efficacy? J Pain. 2000;1(3):14–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Baboota S, Shakeel F, Ahuja A, Ali J, Shafiq S. Design, development and evaluation of novel nanoemulsion formulations for transdermal potential of celecoxib. Acta Pharma. 2007;57(3):315–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shakeel F, Baboota S, Ahuja A, Ali J, Shafiq S. Enhanced anti-inflammatory effects of celecoxib from a transdermally applied nanoemulsion. Pharmazie. 2009;64(4):258–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Janjic JM, Vasudeva K, Saleem M, Stevens A, Liu L, Patel S, et al. Low-dose NSAIDs reduce pain via macrophage targeted nanoemulsion delivery to neuroinflammation of the sciatic nerve in rat. In: J Neuroimmunol, vol. 318; 2018. p. 72–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Patel SK, Beaino W, Anderson CJ, Janjic JM. Theranostic nanoemulsions for macrophage COX-2 inhibition in a murine inflammation model. Clin Immunol. 2015;160(1):59–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vasudeva K, Andersen K, Zeyzus-Johns B, Hitchens TK, Patel SK, Balducci A, et al. Imaging neuroinflammation in vivo in a neuropathic pain rat model with near-infrared fluorescence and (1)(9)F magnetic resonance. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e90589.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ganta S, Singh A, Kulkarni P, Keeler AW, Piroyan A, Sawant RR, et al. EGFR targeted theranostic nanoemulsion for image-guided ovarian cancer therapy. Pharm Res. 2015;32(8):2753–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gianella A, Jarzyna PA, Mani V, Ramachandran S, Calcagno C, Tang J, et al. Multifunctional nanoemulsion platform for imaging guided therapy evaluated in experimental cancer. ACS Nano. 2011;5(6):4422–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fernandez-Fernandez A, Manchanda R, McGoron AJ. Theranostic applications of nanomaterials in cancer: drug delivery, image-guided therapy, and multifunctional platforms. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;165(7–8):1628–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Liu L, Bagia C, Janjic JM. The first scale-up production of theranostic nanoemulsions. BioResearch Open Access. 2015;4:218–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Janjic JM, Berlec A, Bagia C, Liu L, Jeric I, Gach M, et al. NIR and MRI imaging supported hydrogel based delivery system for anti TNF alpha probiotic therapy of IBD. SPIE proceeding. 2016;8:10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Michele Herneisey JW, Mirtic J, Liu L, Potdar S, Bagia C, Cavanaugh J, et al. Development and characterization of resveratrol nanoemulsions carrying dual- imaging agents. Ther Deliv. 2016.

  30. 30.

    Patel SK, Janjic JM. Macrophage targeted theranostics as personalized nanomedicine strategies for inflammatory diseases. Theranostics. 2015;5(2):150–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Patel SK, Zhang Y, Pollock JA, Janjic JM. Cyclooxgenase-2 inhibiting perfluoropoly (ethylene glycol) ether theranostic nanoemulsions-in vitro study. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55802.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Seok SH, Lee S-A, Park E-S. Formulation of a microemulsion-based hydrogel containing celecoxib. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2018;43:409–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Shah SM, Jain AS, Kaushik R, Nagarsenker MS, Nerurkar MJ. Preclinical formulations: insight, strategies, and practical considerations. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15(5):1307–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    U.S. Pharmacopoeia [USP 34 Microgiological Tests / <71> Sterility Tests]. Rockville, MD2011. p. 65–70.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official view or policy of the Department of Defense, Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force or its Components.

Funding

The presented work was supported by the following awards: AFMSA Department of Defense Award FA8650-17-2-6836, National Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Award R21EB023104-02 and National Institute on Drug Abuse Award R21 DA039621-02.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jelena M. Janjic.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 26936 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herneisey, M., Liu, L., Lambert, E. et al. Development of Theranostic Perfluorocarbon Nanoemulsions as a Model Non-Opioid Pain Nanomedicine Using a Quality by Design (QbD) Approach. AAPS PharmSciTech 20, 65 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-1287-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quality by design
  • risk assessment
  • multiple linear regression
  • theranostic perfluorocarbon nanoemulsion
  • pain nanomedicine