Skip to main content

Effect of Formulation and Process Parameters on Chitosan Microparticles Prepared by an Emulsion Crosslinking Technique

AAPS PharmSciTech volume 18, pages 1084–1094 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

There are many studies about the synthesis of chitosan microparticles; however, most of them have very low production rate, have wide size distribution, are difficult to reproduce, and use harsh crosslinking agents. Uniform microparticles are necessary to obtain repeatable drug release behavior. The main focus of this investigation was to study the effect of the process and formulation parameters during the preparation of chitosan microparticles in order to produce particles with narrow size distribution. The technique evaluated during this study was emulsion crosslinking technique. Chitosan is a biocompatible and biodegradable material but lacks good mechanical properties; for that reason, chitosan was ionically crosslinked with sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) at three different ratios (32, 64, and 100%). The model drug used was acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). During the preparation of the microparticles, chitosan was first mixed with ASA and then dispersed in oil containing an emulsifier. The evaporation of the solvents hardened the hydrophilic droplets forming microparticles with spherical shape. The process and formulation parameters were varied, and the microparticles were characterized by their morphology, particle size, drug loading efficiency, and drug release behavior. The higher drug loading efficiency was achieved by using 32% mass ratio of TPP to chitosan. The average microparticle size was 18.7 μm. The optimum formulation conditions to prepare uniform spherical microparticles were determined and represented by a region in a triangular phase diagram. The drug release analyses were evaluated in phosphate buffer solution at pH 7.4 and were mainly completed at 24 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Hoffman AS. The origins and evolution of “controlled” drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2008;132(3):153–63.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park K. Controlled drug delivery systems: past forward and future back. J Control Release. 2014;190:3–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Crommen JHL, Schacht EH, Mense EHG. Biodegradable polymers. Biomaterials. 1992;13(9):601–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Agnihotri SA, Mallikarjuna NN, Aminabhavi TM. Recent advances on chitosan-based micro- and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2004;100(1):5–28.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhumkar D, Pokharkar V. Studies on effect of pH on cross-linking of chitosan with sodium tripolyphosphate: a technical note. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(2):E138–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhise KS, Dhumal RS, Chauhan B, Paradkar A, Kadam SS. Effect of oppositely charged polymer and dissolution medium on swelling, erosion, and drug release from chitosan matrices. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007;8(2):E110–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Marie E, Landfester K, Antonietti M. Synthesis of chitosan-stabilized polymer dispersions, capsules, and chitosan grafting products via miniemulsion. Biomacromolecules. 2002;3(3):475–81.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mi F-L, Shyu S-S, Lee S-T, Wong T-B. Kinetic study of chitosan-tripolyphosphate complex reaction and acid-resistive properties of the chitosan-tripolyphosphate gel beads prepared by in-liquid curing method. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 1999;37(14):1551–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitra A, Dey B. Chitosan microspheres in novel drug delivery systems. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011;73(4):355–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Thanoo BC, Sunny MC, Jayakrishnan A. Cross-linked chitosan microspheres: preparation and evaluation as a matrix for the controlled release of pharmaceuticals. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1992;44(4):283–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinha VR, Singla AK, Wadhawan S, Kaushik R, Kumria R, Bansal K, et al. Chitosan microspheres as a potential carrier for drugs. Int J Pharm. 2004;274(1–2):1–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ko JA, Park HJ, Hwang SJ, Park JB, Lee JS. Preparation and characterization of chitosan microparticles intended for controlled drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2002;249(1–2):165–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. He P, Davis SS, Illum L. Chitosan microspheres prepared by spray drying. Int J Pharm. 1999;187(1):53–65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Agnihotri SA, Aminabhavi TM. Controlled release of clozapine through chitosan microparticles prepared by a novel method. J Control Release. 2004;96(2):245–59.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Phromsopha T, Baimark Y. Chitosan microparticles prepared by the water-in-oil emulsion solvent diffusion method for drug delivery. Biotechnology. 2010;9:61–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kofuji K, Qian C-J, Murata Y, Kawashima S. Preparation of chitosan microparticles by water-in-vegetable oil emulsion coalescence technique. React Funct Polym. 2005;62(1):77–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anal AK, Stevens WF, Remuñán-López C. Ionotropic cross-linked chitosan microspheres for controlled release of ampicillin. Int J Pharm. 2006;312(1–2):166–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Desai KGH, Park HJ. Preparation and characterization of drug-loaded chitosan–tripolyphosphate microspheres by spray drying. Drug Dev Res. 2005;64(2):114–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jayasuriya AC, Bhat A. Optimization of scaled-up chitosan microparticles for bone regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2009;4(5):055006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shiraishi S, Imai T, Otagiri M. Controlled release of indomethacin by chitosan-polyelectrolyte complex: optimization and in vivo/in vitro evaluation. J Control Release. 1993;25(3):217–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor M. Handbook of natural antimicrobials for food safety and quality. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014 2014/11/04/. 443 p.

  22. Riva R, Ragelle H, des Rieux A, Duhem N, Jérôme C, Préat V. Chitosan and chitosan derivatives in drug delivery and tissue engineering. In: Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Muzzarelli RAA, editors. Chitosan for biomaterials II. Berlin: Springer; 2011. p. 19–44.

  23. Gupta KC, Jabrail FH. Glutaraldehyde and glyoxal cross-linked chitosan microspheres for controlled delivery of centchroman. Carbohydr Res. 2006;341(6):744–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li B, Shan C-L, Zhou Q, Fang Y, Wang Y-L, Xu F, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity of cross-linked chitosan-glutaraldehyde. Mar Drugs. 2013;11(5):1534–52.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bodnar M, Hartmann JF, Borbely J. Preparation and characterization of chitosan-based nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(5):2521–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Denkbas EB, Seyyal M, Piskin E. 5-Fluorouracil loaded chitosan microspheres for chemoembolization. J Microencapsul. 1999;16(6):741–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Szymańska E, Winnicka K. Stability of chitosan—a challenge for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(4):1819–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Oliveira BF, Santana MHA, Ré MI. Spray-dried chitosan microspheres cross-linked with d, l-glyceraldehyde as a potential drug delivery system: preparation and characterization. Braz J Chem Eng. 2005;22:353–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Beauchamp RO, St Clair MBG, Fennell TR, Clarke DO, Morgan KT, Karl FW. A critical review of the toxicology of glutaraldehyde. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1992;22(3–4):143–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McConnell EL, Murdan S, Basit AW. An investigation into the digestion of chitosan (noncrosslinked and crosslinked) by human colonic bacteria. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97(9):3820–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. López-León T, Carvalho ELS, Seijo B, Ortega-Vinuesa JL, Bastos-González D. Physicochemical characterization of chitosan nanoparticles: electrokinetic and stability behavior. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;283(2):344–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guliyeva Ü, Öner F, Özsoy Ş, Haziroğlu R. Chitosan microparticles containing plasmid DNA as potential oral gene delivery system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006;62(1):17–25.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li X, Kong X, Shi S, Zheng X, Guo G, Wei Y, et al. Preparation of alginate coated chitosan microparticles for vaccine delivery. BMC Biotechnol. 2008;8(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lubben MVD, Kersten G, Fretz MM, Beuvery C, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE. Chitosan microparticles for mucosal vaccination against diphtheria: oral and nasal efficacy studies in mice. Vaccine. 2003;21:1400–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Honarmand D, Ghoreishi SM, Habibi N, Nicknejad ET. Controlled release of protein from magnetite–chitosan nanoparticles exposed to an alternating magnetic field. J Appl Polym Sci. 2016;133(17):n/a–n/a.

  36. Yang Z, Song B, Li Q, Fan H, Ouyang F. Effects of surfactant and acid type on preparation of chitosan microcapsules. China Particuology. 2004;2(2):70–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stulzer HK, Tagliari MP, Parize AL, Silva MAS, Laranjeira MCM. Evaluation of cross-linked chitosan microparticles containing acyclovir obtained by spray-drying. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29(2):387–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dubey R, Parikh R. Two-stage optimization process for formulation of chitosan microspheres. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004;5(1):20–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Basu SK, Kavitha K, Rupeshkumar M. Evaluation of ketorolac tromethamine microspheres by chitosan/gelatin B complex coacervation. Sci Pharm. 2010;78(1):79–92.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gonjari ID, Hosmani AH, Karmarkar AB, Godage AS, Kadam SB, Dhabale PN. Formulation and evaluation of in situ gelling thermoreversible mucoadhesive gel of fluconazole. Drug Discov Ther. 2009;3(1):6–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shantha KL, Harding DRK. Synthesis and characterisation of chemically modified chitosan microspheres. Carbohydr Polym. 2002;48(3):247–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang L-Y, Gu Y-H, Su Z-G, Ma G-H. Preparation and improvement of release behavior of chitosan microspheres containing insulin. Int J Pharm. 2006;311(1–2):187–95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mi F-L, Shyu S-S, Wong T-B, Jang S-F, Lee S-T, Lu K-T. Chitosan-polyelectrolyte complexation for the preparation of gel beads and controlled release of anticancer drug. II. Effect of pH-dependent ionic crosslinking or interpolymer complex using tripolyphosphate or polyphosphate as reagent. J Appl Polym Sci. 1999;74(5):1093–107.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ajun W, Yan S, Li G, Huili L. Preparation of aspirin and probucol in combination loaded chitosan nanoparticles and in vitro release study. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;75(4):566–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang T, Turhan M, Gunasekaran S. Selected properties of pH-sensitive, biodegradable chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel. Polym Int. 2004;53:911–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Knaul JZ, Hudson SM, Creber KAM. Improved mechanical properties of chitosan fibers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1999;72(13):1721–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shah S, Pal A, Kaushik VK, Devi S. Preparation and characterization of venlafaxine hydrochloride-loaded chitosan nanoparticles and in vitro release of drug. J Appl Polym Sci. 2009;112(5):2876–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Barkai A, Pathak YV, Benita S. Polyacrylate (Eudragit retard) microspheres for oral controlled release of nifedipine. I. Formulation design and process optimization. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1990;16(13):2057–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kawashima Y, Cui F, Takeuchi H, Niwa T, Hino T, Kiuchi K. Parameters determining the agglomeration behaviour and the micromeritic properties of spherically agglomerated crystals prepared by the spherical crystallization technique with miscible solvent systems. Int J Pharm. 1995;119(2):139–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nasti A, Zaki N, de Leonardis P, Ungphaiboon S, Sansongsak P, Rimoli M, et al. Chitosan/TPP and chitosan/TPP-hyaluronic acid nanoparticles: systematic optimisation of the preparative process and preliminary biological evaluation. Pharm Res. 2009;26(8):1918–30.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jonassen H, Kjøniksen A-L, Hiorth M. Effects of ionic strength on the size and compactness of chitosan nanoparticles. Colloid Polym Sci. 2012;290(10):919–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Inactive ingredient search for approved drug products [updated August 3, 2016]. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/iig/index.cfm.

  53. Popa-Nita S, Montembault A, Alcouffe P, Rochas C, David L, Domard A, editors. Control of the hydrophilic/hydrophobic interaction balance in the processing of chitosan physical hydrogels for tissue engineering. Conference on Biomaterials; 2008 2008-05-08; Basel, Switzerland.

  54. Appel EA, Tibbitt MW, Webber MJ, Mattix BA, Veiseh O, Langer R. Self-assembled hydrogels utilising polymer-nanoparticle interactions. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6295.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Rossi B, Venuti V, D’Amico F, Gessini A, Castiglione F, Mele A, et al. Water and polymer dynamics in a model polysaccharide hydrogel: the role of hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17(2):963–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Philippova OE, Volkov EV, Sitnikova NL, Khokhlov AR, Desbrieres J, Rinaudo M. Two types of hydrophobic aggregates in aqueous solutions of chitosan and its hydrophobic derivative. Biomacromolecules. 2001;2(2):483–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yoksan R, Akashi M, Hiwatari K-I, Chirachanchai S. Controlled hydrophobic/hydrophilicity of chitosan for spheres without specific processing technique. Biopolymers. 2003;69(3):386–90.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chuen-Chang L, Chun-Hsien F. Controlled release study of 5-fluorouracil-loaded chitosan/polyethylene glycol microparticles. Drug Deliv. 2009;16(5):274–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gu Y-H, Wang L-Y, Tan T-W, Ma G-H. Preparation of uniform-sized chitosan microspheres and application as carriers for protein drugs. Chin J Biotechnol. 2006;22(1):150–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Barakat NS, Almurshedi AS. Preparation and characterization of chitosan microparticles for oral sustained delivery of gliclazide: in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Drug Dev Res. 2011;72(3):235–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Berthold A, Cremer K, Kreuter J. Preparation and characterization of chitosan microspheres as drug carrier for prednisolone sodium phosphate as model for anti-inflammatory drugs. J Control Release. 1996;39(1):17–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gan Q, Wang T. Chitosan nanoparticle as protein delivery carrier—systematic examination of fabrication conditions for efficient loading and release. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2007;59(1):24–34.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hou Y, Hu J, Park H, Lee M. Chitosan-based nanoparticles as a sustained protein release carrier for tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100A(4):939–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. James-Smith MA, Alford K, Shah DO. A novel method to quantify the amount of surfactant at the oil/water interface and to determine total interfacial area of emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;310(2):590–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tadros T, Izquierdo P, Esquena J, Solans C. Formation and stability of nano-emulsions. Adv Colloid Interf Sci. 2004;108–109:303–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Basu S, Adhiyaman R. Preparation and characterization of nitrendipine-loaded Eudragit RL 100 microspheres prepared by an emulsion-solvent evaporation method. Trop J Pharm Res. 2008;7(3):1033–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang L-Y, Ma G-H, Su Z-G. Preparation of uniform sized chitosan microspheres by membrane emulsification technique and application as a carrier of protein drug. J Control Release. 2005;106(1–2):62–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Takka S, Gürel A. Evaluation of chitosan/alginate beads using experimental design: formulation and in vitro characterization. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11(1):460–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Liu W, Wu WD, Selomulya C, Chen XD. Uniform chitosan microparticles prepared by a novel spray-drying technique. Int J Chem Eng. 2011;2011:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Boonsongrit Y, Mitrevej A, Mueller BW. Chitosan drug binding by ionic interaction. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006;62(3):267–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioengineering, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, 43606, USA

    Lidia B. Rodriguez, Abraham Avalos & Arunan Nadarajah

  2. Department of Neurosciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, 43614, USA

    Nicholas Chiaia

Authors
  1. Lidia B. Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abraham Avalos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicholas Chiaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arunan Nadarajah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lidia B. Rodriguez.

Additional information

Guest Editors: Claudio Salomon, Francisco Goycoolea, and Bruno Moerschbacher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodriguez, L.B., Avalos, A., Chiaia, N. et al. Effect of Formulation and Process Parameters on Chitosan Microparticles Prepared by an Emulsion Crosslinking Technique. AAPS PharmSciTech 18, 1084–1094 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-016-0677-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-016-0677-x

KEY WORDS

  • chitosan
  • drug delivery
  • emulsion
  • microparticles