Abstract
The aim of the current work was the design and evaluation of etodolac controlled porosity osmotic pump (CPOP) tablets exhibiting zero-order release kinetics. Variables influencing the design of (1) core tablets viz., (a) osmogent type (sodium chloride, potassium chloride, mannitol, and fructose) and (b) drug/osmogent ratio (1:0.25, 1:0.50, and 1:0.75), and (2) CPOP tablets viz., (a) coating solution composition, (b) weight gain percentage (1–5%, w/w), and (c) pore former concentration (5%, 10%, and 20%, v/v), were investigated. Statistical analysis and kinetic modeling of drug release data were estimated. Fructose-containing core tablets showed significantly (P < 0.05) more retarded drug release rates. An inverse correlation was observed between drug/fructose ratio and drug release rate. Coating of the optimum core tablets (F4) with a mixture of cellulose acetate solution (3%, w/v), diethyl phthalate, and polyethylene glycol 400 (85:10:5, v/v, respectively) till a 4% w/w weight gain enabled zero-order sustained drug delivery over 24 h. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of coating membrane confirmed pore formation upon contact with dissolution medium. When compared to the commercial immediate-release Napilac® capsules, the optimum CPOP tablets (F4–34) provided enhanced bioavailability and extended duration of effective etodolac plasma concentration with minimum expected potential for side effects in healthy volunteers.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Sweetman SC. Martindale: the complete drug reference, 34th ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press; 2005. Electronic version.
Theeuwes F. Elementary osmotic pump. J Pharm Sci. 1975;64:1987–91.
Sinchaipanid N, Pongwai S, Limsuwan P, Mitrevej A. Design of salbutamol EOP tablets from pharmacokinetics parameters. Pharm Dev Technol. 2003;8(2):135–42.
Theeuwes F, Wong DP, Bonsen P, Place V, Heimlich K, Kwan KC. Elementary osmotic pump for indomethacin. J Pharm Sci. 1983;72(3):253–8.
Liu L, Xu X. Preparation of bilayer-core osmotic pump tablet by coating the indented core tablet. Int J Pharm. 2008;352:225–30.
Wakode R, Bhanushali R, Bajaj A. Development and evaluation of push–pull based osmotic delivery system for pramipexole. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2008;62(1):22–31.
Kanagale P, Lohray BB, Misra A, Davadra D, Kini R. Formulation and optimization of porous osmotic pump-based controlled release system of oxybutynin. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007;8(3):53.
Okimoto K, Tokunaga Y, Ibuki R, Irie T, Uekama K, Rajewski RA, et al. Applicability of (SBE)7m-ß-CD in controlled-porosity osmotic pump tablets (OPTs). Int J Pharm. 2004;286:81–8.
Makhija SN, Vavia PR. Controlled porosity osmotic pump-based controlled release systems of pseudoephedrine. I. Cellulose acetate as a semipermeable membrane. J Control Release. 2003;89:5–18.
Zentner GM, Rork GS, Himmelstein KJ. The controlled porosity osmotic pump. Ibid. 1985;1(4):269–82.
British Pharmacopoeia. British Pharmacopoeia Commission, HMSO, London. 2007. Electronic version.
Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained action medication. J Pharm Sci. 1963;52:1145–9.
United States Pharmacopeia 32 & National Formulary 27. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., Rockville. 2009.
Shoukri RA, Ahmed IS, Shamma RN. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of nimesulide lyophilized orally disintegrating tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;73:162–71.
Nafee NA, Ismail FA, Boraie NA, Mortada LM. Mucoadhesive delivery systems. II. Formulation and in-vitro/in-vivo evaluation of buccal mucoadhesive tablets containing water-soluble drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30(9):995–1004.
Liu L, Ku J, Khang G, Lee B, Rhee JM, Lee HB. Nifedipine controlled delivery by sandwiched osmotic tablet system. J Control Release. 2000;68:145–56.
Shokri J, Ahmadi P, Rashidi P, Shahsavari M, Siahboomi AR, Nokhodchi A. Swellable elementary osmotic pump (SEOP): an effective device for delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;68:289–97.
Verma RK, Krishna DM, Garg S. Formulation aspects in the development of osmotically controlled oral drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2002;79(1–3):7–27.
Kamba M, Seta Y, Kusai A, Ikeda M, Nishimura K. A unique dosage form to evaluate the mechanical destructive force in the gastrointestinal tract. Int J Pharm. 2000;208:61–70.
Bi Y, Mao S, Gan L, Li Y, Wang C, Xu N, et al. A controlled porosity osmotic pump system with biphasic release of theophylline. Chem Pharm Bull. 2007;55(11):1574–80.
Jerzewski RL, Chien YW. Osmotic drug delivery. In: Kydonieus A, editor. Treatise on controlled drug delivery: Fundamentals, optimization, application. New York.: Marcel Dekker; 1992. p. 225–53.
Grundy JS, Anderson KE, Rogers JA, Foster RT. Studies on dissolution testing of the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system. I. Description of a two-phase in vitro dissolution test. J Control Release. 1997;48:1–8.
Liu LX, Che BJ. Preparation of monolithic osmotic pump system by coating the indented core tablet. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006;64:180–4.
Lu EX, Jiang ZQ, Zhang QZ, Jiang XG. A water-insoluble drug monolithic osmotic tablet system utilizing gum arabic as an osmotic, suspending and expanding agent. J Control Release. 2003;92:375–82.
Okimoto K, Ohike A, Ibuki R, Aoki O, Ohnishi N, Rajewski RA, et al. Factors affecting membrane-controlled drug release for an osmotic pump tablet (OPT) utilizing (SBE)7m-ß-CD as both a solubilizer and osmotic agent. J Control Release. 1999;60:311–9.
Hu LD, Liu Y, Tang X, Zhang Q. Preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation of sustained-release metformin hydrochloride pellets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006;64:185–92.
Shiro K, Shigeru S, Hideaki O, Masayuki S, Koichi N, Kenichiro T, et al. Oral etodolac, a COX-2 inhibitor, reduces postoperative pain immediately after fast-track cardiac surgery. J Anesth. 2004;18:9–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abd-Elbary, A., Tadros, M.I. & Alaa-Eldin, A.A. Development and In Vitro/In Vivo Evaluation of Etodolac Controlled Porosity Osmotic Pump Tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech 12, 485–495 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-011-9608-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-011-9608-z