Abstract
These days an alternative to soft capsules is liquid-filled hard capsules. Their filling technology was investigated earlier with highly viscous formulations, while hardly any academic research focused on low-viscosity systems. Accordingly, this work addressed the filling of such oils that are splashing during the dosing process. It was aimed to first study capsule filling, using middle-chain triglycerides as reference oil, in order to then evaluate the concept of a new theoretical splashing degree for different oils. A laboratory-scale filling machine was used that included capsule sealing. Thus, the liquid encapsulation by microspray technology was employed to seal the dosage form. As a result of the study with reference oil, the filling volume and the temperature were found to be significant for the rate of leaking capsules. The filling volume was also important for weight variability of the capsules. However, most critical for this variability was the diameter of the filling nozzle. We proposed a power law for the coefficient of weight variability as a function of the nozzle diameter and the obtained exponent agreed with the proposed theory. Subsequently, a comparison of different oils revealed that the relative splashing degree shared a correlation with the coefficient of the capsule weight variability (Pearson product moment correlation of r = 0.990). The novel theoretical concept was therefore found to be predictive for weight variability of the filled capsules. Finally, guidance was provided for the process development of liquid-filled capsules using low-viscosity oils.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Porter CJ, Trevaskis NL, Charman WN. Lipids and lipid-based formulations: optimizing the oral delivery of lipophilic drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:231–48.
O’Driscoll CM. Biopharmaceutical challenges associated with drugs with low aqueous solubility—the impact of lipid-based formulations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:617–24.
Kuentz M. Oral self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: from biopharmaceutical to technical formulation aspects. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2011 (in press).
Cole ET, Cade D, Benameur H. Challenges and opportunities in the encapsulation of liquid and semi-solid formulations into capsules for oral administration. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2008;60(6):747–56.
Jannin V, Musakhanian J, Marchaud D. Approaches for the development of solid and semi-solid lipid-based formulations. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2008;60:734–46.
Lahr W. Liquid filled hard gelatine capsules. Pharm Ztg. 1986;131(15):871–4.
Bowtle WJ. Materials, process, and manufacturing considerations for lipid-based hard-capsule formats. In: Hauss, editor. Oral Lipid-Based Formulations, 2007. pp. 79–106.
Cole ET. Liquid-filled and sealed hard gelatin capsule technologies. In: Rathbone MJ, Hadgraft J, Roberts MS, editors. Modified-release drug delivery technology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 177–88.
Hawley AR, Rowley G, Lough WJ, Chatham S. Physical and chemical characterization of thermosoftened bases for molten filled hard gelatin capsule formulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1992;18(16):1719–39.
Shah N, Phuapradit W, Ahmed H. Liquid/semi-solid filling in hard gelatin capsules: formulation and processing considerations. Bull Tech Gattefossé. 1996;89:27–37.
Walters PA, Rowley G, Pearson JT, Taylor CJ. Formulation and physical properties of thixotropic gels for hard gelatin capsules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1992;18(15):1613–31.
Rowley G, Hawley AR, Dobson CL, Chatham S. Rheology and filling characteristics of particulate dispersions in polymer melt formulations for liquid fill hard gelatin capsules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1998;24(7):605–11.
Kattige A, Rowley G. Influence of rheological behaviour of particulate/polymer dispersions on liquid-filling characteristics for hard gelatin capsules. Int J Pharm. 2006;316:74–85.
Cole ET. Liquid filled and sealed hard gelatin capsules. Bull Tech Gattefossé. 1999;92:67–76.
Patil P, Joshi P, Paradkar A. Effect of Formulation Variables on Preparation and Evaluation of Gelled Self-emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (SEDDS) of Ketoprofen. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2004;5(3):1–8.
Rein M. Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces. Fluid Dyn Res. 1993;12(2):61–93.
Mundo CHR, Sommerfeld M, Tropea C. Droplet–wall collisions: experimental studies of the deformation and breakup process. Int J Multiph Flow. 1995;21(2):151–73.
Manzello SL, Yang JC. An experimental study of a water droplet imprinting on a liquid surface. Exp Fluids. 2002;32:580–9.
Yarin AL. Droplet impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receeding, bouncing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2006;38:159–92.
Rodrigues F, Mesler RJ. Some drops don’t splash. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1985;106:347–52.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the University of Applied Sciences, Northwestern Switzerland for funding the research project. The authors would also like to thank Capsugel for providing the CFS1200™.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niederquell, A., Kuentz, M. Introduction of a Theoretical Splashing Degree to Assess the Performance of Low-Viscosity Oils in Filling of Capsules. AAPS PharmSciTech 12, 323–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-011-9589-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-011-9589-y