Advertisement

AAPS PharmSciTech

, 10:1406 | Cite as

Reduced Pressure Ice Fog Technique for Controlled Ice Nucleation during Freeze-Drying

  • Sajal M. Patel
  • Chandan Bhugra
  • Michael J. Pikal
Research Article

Abstract

A method to achieve controlled ice nucleation during the freeze-drying process using an ice fog technique was demonstrated in an earlier report. However, the time required for nucleation was about 5 min, even though only one shelf was used, which resulted in Ostwald ripening (annealing) in some of the vials that nucleated earlier than the others. As a result, the ice structure was not optimally uniform in all the vials. The objective of the present study is to introduce a simple variation of the ice fog method whereby a reduced pressure in the chamber is utilized to allow more rapid and uniform freezing which is also potentially easier to scale up. Experiments were conducted on a lab scale freeze dryer with sucrose as model compound at different concentration, product load, and fill volume. Product resistance during primary drying was measured using manometric temperature measurement. Specific surface area of the freeze-dried cake was also determined. No difference was observed either in average product resistance or specific surface area for the different experimental conditions studied, indicating that with use of the reduced pressure ice fog technique, the solutions nucleated at very nearly the same temperature (−10°C). The striking feature of the “Reduced Pressure Ice Fog Technique” is the rapid ice nucleation (less than a minute) under conditions where the earlier procedure required about 5 min; hence, effects of variable Ostwald ripening were not an issue.

Key words

controlled ice nucleation freeze-drying ice fog reduced pressure scale-up 

References

  1. 1.
    Kochs M, Koerber C, Heschel I, Nunner B. The influence of the freezing process on vapor transport during sublimation in vacuum-freeze-drying of macroscopic samples. Int J of Heat and Mass Transfer. 1993;36(7):1727–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roy ML, Pikal MJ. Process control in freeze drying: determination of the end point of sublimation drying by an electronic moisture sensor. J Parenter Sci Technol. 1989;43(2):60–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Searles JA, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW. The ice nucleation temperature determines the primary drying rate of lyophilization for samples frozen on a temperature-controlled shelf. J Pharm Sci. 2001;90(7):860–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowe TW. A technique for the nucleation of ice. International Symposium on Biological Product Freeze-Drying and Formulation. Switzerland: Geneva; 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rambhatla S, Ramot R, Bhugra C, Pikal MJ. Heat and mass transfer scale-up issues during freeze drying: II. Control and characterization of the degree of super-cooling. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004;5(4):e58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nail SL, Johnson W. Methodology for in-process determination of residual water in freeze-dreid products. Dev biol Stand. 1991;74:137–51.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Milton N, Pikal MJ, Roy ML, Nail SL. Evaluation of manometric temperature measurement as a method of monitoring product temperature during lyophilization. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 1997;51(1):7–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tang X, Nail SL, Pikal MJ. Evaluation of manometric temperature measurement, a process analytical technology tool for freeze-drying: part II measurement of dry-layer resistance. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(4):93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pikal MJ, Shah S, Senior D, Lang JE. Physical chemistry of freeze-drying: measurement of sublimation rates for frozen aqueous solutions by a microbalance technique. J Pharm Sci. 1983;72(6):635–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel SM, Thummala A, Jameel F, Pikal MJ. The effect of dryer load on freeze-drying process design: comparison of load condition on laboratory and pilot scale freeze-dryer. AAPS National Biotech Conference; 2008; Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sajal M. Patel
    • 1
  • Chandan Bhugra
    • 2
  • Michael J. Pikal
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PharmacyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Pharmaceutical R&DBoehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.RidgefieldUSA

Personalised recommendations