Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spreadability Measurements to Assess Structural Equivalence (Q3) of Topical Formulations—A Technical Note

  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. V. P. Shah, G. L. Flynn, and A. Yacobi, et al. Bioequivalence of topical dermatological dosage forms-methods of evaluation of bioequivalence. Pharm. Res. 15:167–171 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. V. P. Shah. Progress in methodologies for evaluating bioequivalence of topical formulations. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 5:275–280 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. X. Yu. Office of Generic Drugs: Science Update. GPhA/OGD Joint Meeting, June 26, 2003. US Food and Drug Administration Website. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/. Accessed October 18, 2006.

  4. C. R. Daubert, J. R. Tkachuk, and V. D. Truong. Quantitative measurement of food spreadability using the vane method. J. Texture Stud. 29:427–435 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. L. Kokini and A. Dickie. A model food spreadability from fluid mechanics. J. Texture Stud. 13:211–227 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Juszczak, M. Witczak, T. Fortuna, and A. Banys. Rheological properties of commercial mustards. J. Food Eng. 63:209–217 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Q. Dzuy and D. V. Boger. Yield stress measurement for concentrated suspensions. J. Rheol. 4:321–349 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Q. Dzuy and D. V. Boger. Direct yield stress measurement with the vane method. J. Rheol. 3:335–347 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. C. Chow and J. P. Liu. Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Science Foundation/Research Experience for Undergraduates (Grant DMR-0097692) and the University of Kentucky, College of Pharmacy Summer Undergraduate Research Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, 177 F. Paul Anderson Tower, Lexington, Kentucky, 40506, USA

    David R. Kryscio & J. Zach Hilt

  2. Center for Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

    Michael A. Bell & Michael Jay

  3. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Generic Drugs, 7519 Standish Place, Rockville, Maryland, 20855, USA

    Pradeep M. Sathe, Robert Lionberger & Lawrence Yu

Authors
  1. David R. Kryscio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pradeep M. Sathe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Lionberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lawrence Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael A. Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael Jay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Zach Hilt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Zach Hilt.

Additional information

Opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the FDA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kryscio, D.R., Sathe, P.M., Lionberger, R. et al. Spreadability Measurements to Assess Structural Equivalence (Q3) of Topical Formulations—A Technical Note. AAPS PharmSciTech 9, 84–86 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-007-9009-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-007-9009-5

Key words

Search

Navigation