Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Prediction Model of Tumor Progression and Survival in HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of different patient factors and dose levels of chemotherapeutic agents on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric cancer are not as yet fully characterized. We aimed at developing an integrative model that incorporates dose and covariate information to predict tumor growth and patient survival in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab (T), 5-FU(F)/capecitabine (X) (F or X), and cisplatin (P). Sixty-nine patients (training dataset) were used for model building and a separate 86 patients (test dataset) for model validation. A fraction of tumor cells sensitive to each drug was incorporated as a model parameter, and T was assumed as cytostatic and X/F and P as cytotoxic. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed on model parameters and patient covariates. The model well described the time course of observed tumor size changes, and revealed that the pretreatment tumor growth rate constant kg, which was formulated as a function of pretreatment disease duration and baseline tumor size, was positively correlated with baseline tumor size (p = 0.0084) and histologic grade (p = 0.034), and the efficacy of 5-FU with body weight (p < 2e−16) and that of cisplatin with histologic grade (p = 0.00013). Prior gastrectomy and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores were significant prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS). For hazards analysis, a unit increase of kg was associated with a relative risk of 3.19 for PFS (p = 0.00055) and 4.45 for OS (p = 2e−04) in the test dataset, with a similar trend observed in the training dataset. Dose-response simulations showed that, for small baseline tumor size or low histologic grade, a maximum cytotoxic effect was attainable with a dose smaller than the current recommended dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):687–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosson VF, Ng VW, Lehle M, Lum BL. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses of trastuzumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(4):737–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chau I, Norman AR, Cunningham D, Waters JS, Oates J, Ross PJ. Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer—pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(12):2395–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chau I, Ashley S, Cunningham D. Validation of the Royal Marsden hospital prognostic index in advanced esophagogastric cancer using individual patient data from the REAL 2 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):e3–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pozzo C, Ohashi Y, project G. Meta-analyses of randomized trials assessing the influence of chemotherapy and prognostic factor in advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15_suppl):4550.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee H, Yuh Y, Kim S. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level as a prognostic factor for the patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15_suppl):e15621.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piessevaux H, Buyse M, Schlichting M, Van Cutsem E, Bokemeyer C, Heeger S, et al. Use of early tumor shrinkage to predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(30):3764–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, Lonardi S, Masi G, Salvatore L, et al. Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III TRIBE trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(6):1188–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsuji A, Sunakawa Y, Ichikawa W, Nakamura M, Kochi M, Denda T, et al. Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response as predictors of favorable treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFOX plus cetuximab (JACCRO CC-05). Target Oncol. 2016;11:799–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilkerson J, Abdallah K, Hugh-Jones C, Curt G, Rothenberg M, Simantov R, et al. Estimation of tumour regression and growth rates during treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):143–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jang GS, Kim MJ, Ha HI, Kim JH, Kim HS, Ju SB, et al. Comparison of RECIST version 1.0 and 1.1 in assessment of tumor response by computed tomography in advanced gastric cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 2013;25(6):689–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Simeoni M, Magni P, Cammia C, De Nicolao G, Croci V, Pesenti E, et al. Predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tumor growth kinetics in xenograft models after administration of anticancer agents. Cancer Res. 2004;64(3):1094–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim SY, Kim HP, Kim YJ, Oh DY, Im SA, Lee D, et al. Trastuzumab inhibits the growth of human gastric cancer cell lines with HER2 amplification synergistically with cisplatin. Int J Oncol. 2008;32(1):89–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yano Y, Beal SL, Sheiner LB. Evaluating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models using the posterior predictive check. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28(2):171–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang DD, Zhang S. Standardized visual predictive check versus visual predictive check for model evaluation. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52(1):39–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bastogne T, Samson A, Vallois P, Wantz-Mezieres S, Pinel S, Bechet D, et al. Phenomenological modeling of tumor diameter growth based on a mixed effects model. J Theor Biol. 2010;262(3):544–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsang RY, Al-Fayea T, Au HJ. Cisplatin overdose: toxicities and management. Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1109–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Santos C, Morgan BW, Geller RJ. The successful treatment of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) overdose in a patient with malignancy and HIV/AIDS with uridine triacetate. Am J Emerg Med. 2016.

  20. Hartung N, Mollard S, Barbolosi D, Benabdallah A, Chapuisat G, Henry G, et al. Mathematical modeling of tumor growth and metastatic spreading: validation in tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Res. 2014;74(22):6397–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Greaves M, Maley CC. Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature. 2012;481(7381):306–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jacqmin P, Snoeck E, van Schaick EA, Gieschke R, Pillai P, Steimer JL, et al. Modelling response time profiles in the absence of drug concentrations: definition and performance evaluation of the K-PD model. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2007;34(1):57–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sun Young Rha or Kyungsoo Park.

Ethics declarations

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital and was identical to that of the ToGA clinical trial, except that, for patients enrolled after year 2012, RECIST version 1.1 was used (12) instead of Version 1.0.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chae, D., Nam, C.M., Kim, J.H. et al. A Prediction Model of Tumor Progression and Survival in HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy. AAPS J 20, 72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-018-0223-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-018-0223-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation