Pharmacoimaging of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeable (FDG) and Impermeable (FLT) Substrates After Intranasal (IN) Administration
To illustrate the use of imaging to quantify the transfer of materials from the nasal cavity to other anatomical compartments, specifically, transfer to the brain using the thymidine analogue, [18F]fluorothymidine (FLT), and the glucose analogue, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Anesthetized rats were administered FLT or FDG by intranasal instillation (IN) or tail-vein injection (IV). PET/CT imaging was performed for up to 60 min. Volumes-of-interest (VOIs) for the olfactory bulb (OB) and the remaining brain were created on the CT and transferred to the co-registered dynamic PET. Time-activity curves (TACs) were generated and compared. The disposition patterns were successfully visualized and quantified and differences in brain distribution patterns were observed. For FDG, the concentration was substantially higher in the OB than the brain only after IN administration. For FLT, the concentration was higher in the OB than the brain after both IN and IV and higher after IN than after IV administration at all times, whereas the concentration in the brain was higher after IN than after IV administration at early times only. Approximately 50 and 9% of the IN FDG and FLT doses, respectively, remained in the nasal cavity at 20 min post-administration. The initial phase of clearance was similar for both agents (t1/2 = 2.53 and 3.36 min) but the slow clearance phase was more rapid for FLT than FDG (t1/2 = 32.1 and 85.2 min, respectively). Pharmacoimaging techniques employing PET/CT can be successfully implemented to quantitatively investigate and compare the disposition of radiolabeled agents administered by a variety of routes.
KEY WORDSNasal absorption Preclinical pharmacokinetics Site-specific absorption pharmacoimaging [18F]fluorothymidine (FLT) [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01DC008374-03S1. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
- 7.Menda Y, Boles Ponto LL, Dornfeld KJ, Tewson TJ, Watkins GL, Gupta AK, et al. Investigation of the pharmacokinetics of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine uptake in the bone marrow before and early after initiation of chemoradiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Nucl Med Biol. 2010;37(4):433–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.02.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.McGuire SM, Menda Y, Boles Ponto LL, Gross B, Buatti J, Bayouth JE. 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine PET quantification of bone marrow response to radiation dose. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2011;81(3):888–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.McGuire SM, Bhatia SK, Sun W, Jacobson GM, Menda Y, Ponto LL, et al. Using [18F]Fluorothymidine imaged with positron emission tomography to quantify and reduce hematologic toxicity due to chemoradiation therapy for pelvic cancer patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2016;96(1):228–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Saga TMD, Kawashima H, Araki N, Takahashi JA, Nakashima Y, Higashi T, et al. Evaluation of primary brain tumors with FLT-PET: usefulness and limitations. Clin Nucl Med. 2006;31(12):774–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rlu.0000246820.14892.d2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Shinomiya A, Kawai N, Okada M, Miyake K, Nakamura T, Kushida Y, et al. Evaluation of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) kinetics correlated with thymidine kinase-1 expression and cell proliferation in newly diagnosed gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(2):175–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2275-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Shingaki T, Katayama Y, Nakaoka T, Irie S, Onoe K, Okauchi T, et al. Visualization of drug translocation in the nasal cavity and pharmacokinetic analysis on nasal drug absorption using positron emission tomography in the rat. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;99:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.11.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Shiga H, Taki J, Okuda K, Watanabe N, Tonami H, Nakagawa H, et al. Prognostic value of olfactory nerve damage measured with thallium-based olfactory imaging in patients with idiopathic olfactory dysfunction. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3581. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03894-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Shiga H, Taki J, Washiyama K, Yamamoto J, Kinase S, Okuda K, et al. Assessment of olfactory nerve by SPECT-MRI image with nasal Thallium-201 administration in patients with olfactory impairments in comparison to healthy volunteers. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057671.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Plotnik DA, Asher C, Chu SK, Miyaoka RS, Garwin GG, Johnson BW, et al. Levels of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 are higher in proliferating regions of A549 tumor cells grown as tumor xenografts in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39(8):1161–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.07.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Plotnik DA, McLaughlin LJ, Chan J, Redmayne-Titley JN, Schwartz JL. The role of nucleoside/nucleotide transport and metabolism in the uptake and retention of 3′-fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine in human B-lymphoblast cells. Nucl Med Biol. 2011;38(7):979–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.03.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Ponto LLB, Huang J, Walsh SA, Acevedo MR, Mundt C, Sunderland J, et al. Demonstration of nucleoside transporter activity in the nose-to-brain distribution of [18F]Fluorothymidine using PET imaging. AAPS J. Google Scholar