Skip to main content

Characterising Drug Release from Immediate-Release Formulations of a Poorly Soluble Compound, Basmisanil, Through Absorption Modelling and Dissolution Testing

Abstract

The study aimed to characterise the mechanism of release and absorption of Basmisanil, a biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) class 2 compound, from immediate-release formulations via mechanistic absorption modelling, dissolution testing, and Raman imaging. An oral absorption model was developed in GastroPlus® and verified with single-dose pharmacokinetic data in humans. The properties and drug release behaviour of different oral Basmisanil formulations were characterised via biorelevant dissolution and Raman imaging studies. Finally, an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) model was developed using conventional and mechanistic deconvolution methods for comparison. The GastroPlus model accurately simulated oral Basmisanil exposure from tablets and granules formulations containing micronized drug. Absorption of oral doses below 200 mg was mostly dissolution rate-limited and thus particularly sensitive to formulation properties. Indeed, reduced exposure was observed for a 120-mg film-coated tablet and the slower dissolution rate measured in biorelevant media was attributed to differences in drug load. This hypothesis was confirmed when Raman imaging showed that the percolation threshold was exceeded in this formulation. This biorelevant dissolution method clearly differentiated between the formulations and was used to develop a robust IVIVC model. The study demonstrates the applicability and impact of mechanistic absorption modelling and biopharmaceutical in vitro tools for rational drug development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. FDA. Guidance for Industry Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development. FDA (CDER). 2009.

  2. Polli JE, Cook JA, Davit BM, Dickinson PA, Argenti D, Barbour N, et al. Summary workshop report: facilitating oral product development and reducing regulatory burden through novel approaches to assess bioavailability/bioequivalence. AAPS J. 2012;14(3):627–38. doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9376-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kesisoglou F, Rossenu S, Farrell C, Van Den Heuvel M, Prohn M, Fitzpatrick S, et al. Development of in vitro-in vivo correlation for extended-release niacin after administration of hypromellose-based matrix formulations to healthy volunteers. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103(11):3713–23. doi:10.1002/jps.24179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eaga C, Mantri S, Malayandi R, Kondamudi PK, Chakraborty S, Raju SVN, et al. Establishing postprandial bio-equivalency and IVIVC for generic metformin sustained release small sized tablets. J Pharm Investig. 2014;44(3):197–204. doi:10.1007/s40005-013-0115-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ilic M, Duris J, Kovacevic I, Ibric S, Parojcic J. In vitro-in silico-in vivo drug absorption model development based on mechanistic gastrointestinal simulation and artificial neural networks: nifedipine osmotic release tablets case study. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;62:212–8. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2014.05.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parejiya PB, Barot BS, Patel HK, Chorawala MR, Shelat PK, Shukla A. In vivo performance evaluation and establishment of IVIVC for osmotic pump based extended release formulation of milnacipran HCl. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2013;34(4):227–35. doi:10.1002/bdd.1840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Selen A, Cruañes M, Müllertz A, Dickinson P, Cook J, Polli J, et al. Meeting report: applied biopharmaceutics and quality by design for dissolution/release specification setting: product quality for patient benefit. AAPS J. 2010;12(3):465–72. doi:10.1208/s12248-010-9206-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang X, Lionberger RA, Davit BM, Yu LX. Utility of physiologically based absorption modeling in implementing Quality by Design in drug development. AAPS J. 2011;13(1):59–71. doi:10.1208/s12248-010-9250-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kesisoglou F, Mitra A. Application of absorption modeling in rational design of drug product under Quality-by-Design paradigm. AAPS J. 2015;17(5):1224–36. doi:10.1208/s12248-015-9781-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathias NR, Crison J. The use of modeling tools to drive efficient oral product design. AAPS J. 2012;14(3):591–600. doi:10.1208/s12248-012-9372-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Xia B, Sheng J, Heimbach T, Lin T-H, He H, et al. Application of physiologically based absorption modeling to formulation development of a low solubility, low permeability weak base: mechanistic investigation of food effect. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15(2):400–6. doi:10.1208/s12249-014-0075-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Flanagan T, Van Peer A, Lindahl A. Use of physiologically relevant biopharmaceutics tools within the pharmaceutical industry and in regulatory sciences: where are we now and what are the gaps? Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;91:84–90. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2016.06.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson KC, Swindell AC. Guidance in the setting of drug particle size specifications to minimize variability in absorption. Pharm Res. 1996;13(12):1795–8. doi:10.1023/a:1016068705255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Galia E, Nicolaides E, Hörter D, Löbenberg R, Reppas C, Dressman JB. Evaluation of various dissolution media for predicting in vivo performance of class I and II drugs. Pharm Res. 1998;15(5):698–705. doi:10.1023/a:1011910801212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parrott N, Lave T. Applications of physiologically based absorption models in drug discovery and development. Mol Pharm. 2008;5(5):760–75. doi:10.1021/mp8000155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner JG. Pharmacokinetic absorption plots from oral data alone or oral/intravenous data and an exact Loo–Riegelman equation. J Pharm Sci. 1983;72(7):838–42. doi:10.1002/jps.2600720738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langenbucher F. Handling of computational in vitro/in vivo correlation problems by Microsoft Excel: III. Convolution and deconvolution. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;56(3):429–37. doi:10.1016/S0939-6411(03)00140-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kostewicz ES, Aarons L, Bergstrand M, Bolger MB, Galetin A, Hatley O, et al. PBPK models for the prediction of in vivo performance of oral dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;57:300–21. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.09.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Potharaju S. Effect of compression force on agglomeration of micronized active pharmaceutical ingredients: techniques to prevent API agglomeration during compression. Tennessee: University of Tennessee Health Science Center; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leuenberger H. The application of percolation theory in powder technology. Adv Powder Technol. 1999;10(4):323–52. doi:10.1163/156855299X00190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohamed FA, Roberts M, Seton L, Ford JL, Levina M, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR. The effect of HPMC particle size on the drug release rate and the percolation threshold in extended-release mini-tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2015;41(1):70–8. doi:10.3109/03639045.2013.845843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miranda A, Millan M, Caraballo I. Investigation of the influence of particle size on the excipient percolation thresholds of HPMC hydrophilic matrix tablets. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96(10):2746–56. doi:10.1002/jps.20912.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boersen N, Carvajal MT, Morris KR, Peck GE, Pinal R. The influence of API concentration on the roller compaction process: modeling and prediction of the post compacted ribbon, granule and tablet properties using multivariate data analysis. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2015;41(9):1470–8. doi:10.3109/03639045.2014.958754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirschorn JO, Kornblum SS. Dissolution of poorly water-soluble drugs II: excipient dilution and force of compression effects on tablets of a quinazolinone compound. J Pharm Sci. 1971;60(3):445–8. doi:10.1002/jps.2600600321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Honório da Silva T, Pinto EC, Rocha HVA, Esteves VSAD, dos Santos TC, Castro HCR, et al. In vitro–in vivo correlation of Efavirenz tablets using GastroPlus®. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(3):1244–54. doi:10.1208/s12249-013-0016-4.

  26. Kesisoglou F, Xia B, Agrawal NGB. Comparison of deconvolution-based and absorption modeling IVIVC for extended release formulations of a BCS III drug development candidate. AAPS J. 2015;17(6):1492–500. doi:10.1208/s12248-015-9816-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Margolskee A, Darwich AS, Galetin A, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Aarons L. Deconvolution and IVIVC: exploring the role of rate-limiting conditions. AAPS J. 2016;18(2):321–32. doi:10.1208/s12248-015-9849-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Anni Pabst-Ravot (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) for analytical support. Dr. Carsten Brüsewitz (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) is gratefully acknowledged for providing the clinical study material for pharmacokinetic studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cordula Stillhart.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 115 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 718 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 239 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 43 kb)

ESM 5

(DOCX 43 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stillhart, C., Parrott, N.J., Lindenberg, M. et al. Characterising Drug Release from Immediate-Release Formulations of a Poorly Soluble Compound, Basmisanil, Through Absorption Modelling and Dissolution Testing. AAPS J 19, 827–836 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0060-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0060-1

KEY WORDS

  • absorption modelling
  • GastroPlus
  • immediate-release formulation
  • in vitro-in vivo correlation
  • poorly water-soluble compound