Development of a Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) Particle Vaccine to Protect Against House Dust Mite Induced Allergy
- 579 Downloads
Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) particles carrying antigen and adjuvant is a promising vaccine system which has been shown to stimulate systemic antigen-specific immune responses. In this study, we investigated the relationship of (i) the sizes of PLGA particle and (ii) the presence of cytosine-phosphate-guanine motifs (CpG), with the extent and type of immune response stimulated against Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-2 (Der p2) antigen. Different sizes of PLGA particles encapsulating CpG were prepared using a double emulsion solvent evaporation method. Mice were vaccinated with Der p2 and different sizes of empty or CpG-loaded PLGA particles. Vaccinated mice were exposed to daily intranasal instillation of Der p2 for 10 days followed by euthanization to estimate leukocyte accumulation in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids, antibody profiles, and airway hyperresponsiveness. PLGA particles showed a size-dependent decrease in the proportion of eosinophils found in BAL fluids. Mice vaccinated with the Der p2 coated on 9-μm-sized empty PLGA particles showed increased levels of IgE and IgG1 antibodies as well as increased airway hyperresponsiveness. All sizes of PLGA particles encapsulating CpG prevented airway hyperresponsiveness after Der p2 exposures. Inflammatory responses to Der p2 exposure were significantly reduced when smaller PLGA particles were used for vaccination. In addition, encapsulating CpG in PLGA particles increased IgG2a secretion. This study shows that the size of PLGA particles used for vaccination plays a major role in the prevention of house dust mite-induced allergy and that incorporation of CpG into the PLGA particles preferentially develops a Th1-type immune response.
Keywordsallergy CpG Der p2 house dust mite PLGA vaccine
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences-funded Environmental Health Sciences Research Center (NIH P30 ES005605). Other sources of support include the American Cancer Society (RSG-09-015-01-CDD), the National Cancer Institute (NIH 1R21CA13345-01/1R21CA128414-01A2/UI Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE), and the Lyle and Sharon Bighley Professorship. We thank Sean Geary for expert reading of the manuscript.
- 8.Eifan AO, Akkoc T, Yildiz A, Keles S, Ozdemir C, Bahceciler NN, et al. Clinical efficacy and immunological mechanisms of sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy in asthmatic/rhinitis children sensitized to house dust mite: an open randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40(6):922–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Burks AW, Calderon MA, Casale T, Cox L, Demoly P, Jutel M, et al. Update on allergy immunotherapy: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology/PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(5):1288–96 e3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Trombone APF, Tobias KRC, Ferriani VPL, Schuurman J, Aalberse RC, Smith AM, et al. Use of a chimeric ELISA to investigate immunoglobulin E antibody responses to Der p 1 and Der p 2 in mite-allergic patients with asthma, wheezing and/or rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32(9):1323–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kaburaki Y, Fujimura T, Kurata K, Masuda K, Toda M, Yasueda H, et al. Induction of Th1 immune responses to Japanese cedar pollen allergen (Cry j 1) in mice immunized with Cry j 1 conjugated with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;34(2):157–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Suzuki K, Kaminuma O, Yang L, Takai T, Mori A, Umezu-Goto M, et al. Prevention of allergic asthma by vaccination with transgenic rice seed expressing mite allergen: induction of allergen-specific oral tolerance without bystander suppression. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9(9):982–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Shen J, Burgess DJ. Drugs for long acting injections and implants. In: Wright JC, Burgess DJ, editors. Long acting injections and implants. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 73–92.Google Scholar